Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I was wondering for a stock R33 GTST what is the 'average' (if there is such a thing) rear wheel kilowatts.

From the flywheel it is around 185kW?

I read in a performance mag that rwkW is around 120-135. WTF? Is there that much kW lost? That would be pretty inefficient then.

Also, what effect would 3" dump back zorst do to that rwkW? How much on 'average' increase in kW would you expect?

Cheers

kW

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/
Share on other sites

For a start i dont know if u got it but i would get a filter ,either pod or in box k&n.A dyno will help your car run its optimum for the set up u have .Some dyno places recon they can get another 10=15psi just by dyno tune ..With the standard ecu there isnt tooo much to change.I would get it dyno to give u a starting figure before any mods.Also my r33 ran better at 10psi than it does on 12 psi,so things like this u can set up on a dyno.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-413818
Share on other sites

Hi guys, we have had over 20 standard R33 GTST's on the dyno, with kilometres from 10,000 top 130,000. The power output hardly varies in Shootout mode with temperature and humidity compensation loaded. The only time we see low numbers we find poor compression or other problems, fuel pumps, fuel regs, plugs etc. If it leaks down less than 25% and the support stuff is in good condition, they always make 120 to 130 rwkw.

We have found the same with RB20DET's, they are very consistent and always make 105 to 110 rwkw. We have had a couple with close to 200,000 kilometres on them and they test fine. Maintenance (regular oil and filter changes etc) seems to be far more important than age or kilometres travelled.

So to answer king_kw13 question, 50 to 60 kw losses through the drive train are very common.

As the REV said, they do vary, but we generally find that ones down on power have a support system problem or are badly tuned. The engine internals are generally pretty good and they come up well once we fix whatever the problem is.

We do find really bad ones, but they are rare. We had a 120,000k one in a couple of months ago that I removed the cam covers off and found great lumps of "vegemite" everywhere. Sent the gunk off to a chemist mate at Castrol and he reckons it had never had an oil change in its life, it was still the original running in oil.

Hope that adds to the discussion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-415952
Share on other sites

its all done on one dyno in one wharehouse and run by someone who sets it up every run for the correct variables to an ambient temp of 24degrees celcius... it makes for a good comparison at minimum and a good general idea, even for anyone who wants to question its morals

S of S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-416918
Share on other sites

when my car was dyno just after getting it off the ship it pulled 97kw@rear wheels, that was bog stock standard same way it left the dealership when brand new. After a good cat back exhaust and a small amount of timing it went to 115kw@rear wheels. I've used the same dyno pretty much each time since then. After fitting the front mount, boost controller and HKS pod it made 179kw@rear wheels (boost set to 12psi) and then 183kw@rear wheels after fitting the dump+front pipe. I would say if I fit an aftermarket ecu next I'd be able to just get over 200kw. But the odd thing is the dyno figure my car gave when it first got here, I'm not sure what boost it was running back then (no decent boost gauge and didnt ask the dyno guys if they measured it), anyway the power levels seem on parr with the other guys in WA with simular mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-417034
Share on other sites

a split dump turbo back exhaust, as opposed to a single turbo back exhaust, is good for almost as much power as what you gain from a cat back. But a tuboback and catback exhaust is only as good as the cat itself. A full split dump turbo back, hi-flow cat and cat-back should be worth about 25-30rwkw.

S of S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-417122
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Sydneykid

a split dump turbo back exhaust, as opposed to a single turbo back exhaust, is good for almost as much power as what you gain from a cat back. But a tuboback and catback exhaust is only as good as the cat itself. A full split dump turbo back, hi-flow cat and cat-back should be worth about 25-30rwkw.  

S of S

Split dump pipe is a superfluous modification, a well made one peice is just as good and often cheaper on the stock turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19683-stock-gtst-rwkw/#findComment-417423
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...