Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

as some of you may know, about 3 weeks ago i road off my r33gtst on the gor cruise. :) the time has come and so has the insurance money, to buy another car and am now in a position to buy an r34. Write off was a good excuse to upgrade. :(

Car 2: 99 R34GTT. grey, nismo kit (factory kit) other than that standard.

thanks in advance for some help with my decision.

MY BEAST IS BELOW

post-31466-1197282796_thumb.jpg

post-31466-1197282901_thumb.jpg

Edited by cheez
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/197077-stuck-on-colour-choice/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ive test drove both, exactly the same. the have the same handling setup and sae diff and gear ratios. neither have been molested before by the looks of the interiors and engine bays.

+1 for yellow

every second car on the road is silver and you can always get a kit for it later on

there are a couple yellow 34s in my area and both look pron! eventhough both have chromies...

silver's just too boring.

kthx

EDIT: thats the japcar in fawkner yea? wats the cheapest GTT they got? :(

Edited by R-SPEC

yeh its jap car in fawkner. i bought my first car off him so went back and hes doing me a good deal. price wise the grey and the yellow are the same, 22k approx wit on roads. so for me its just a colour choice.

yeh its jap car in fawkner. i bought my first car off him so went back and hes doing me a good deal. price wise the grey and the yellow are the same, 22k approx wit on roads. so for me its just a colour choice.

My cousins good friend owns Jap car, are you dealing with Dennis?

Some very good cars have come out of that yard, inclduing a GTR that was posted up in the VIC section not to long ago that made close to 300rwkw.

Owner didn't know it had high flow turbos and a chipped ECU, thought it was stock with an exhaust. :(

Edited by abu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...