Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if it helps 33 master is different (longer) and not a great fit in a 32. But I guess you are wondering about diameter?

33 one looks like the photo below.

I am just trying to determine what the 32 version looks like so I can be sure I get suffient parts if/when I change it over.

Either that or I will have to get an AP unit or similar.

Diamter is sorted R32 = 25.4mm, 33 = 26.9mm

post-5134-1197586510_thumb.jpg

I though R32 V-Spec and R33 m/s were the same? I know the cusco m/s stopper don't fit a R32 V-Spec (according to the notes on sites that sell them)

From the little I can make out on shots of R32 V-Spec engine bays the master cylinder arrangement looks to be different to the 33's.

Surely someone out there must have a photo?

  • 8 months later...

I just put a R33 GT-R V-Spec (V-Spec shouldn't make a diff on R33) master cylinder on my car. The external dimensions are identical to the pov pack R32 GT-R, the only difference is that the warning plug is different.

I just put a R33 GT-R V-Spec (V-Spec shouldn't make a diff on R33) master cylinder on my car. The external dimensions are identical to the pov pack R32 GT-R, the only difference is that the warning plug is different.

That is usefull info. For some reason when you look at the brake stoppers as offered by Cusco etc they appear to differentiate between the Brembo & non Brembo Gt-R's. No idea why.

Anyway this is what little I have been able to find out.

Brake master cylinders for R32 Gt-R's.

Part numbers are stamped on the end of the master cylinder. There appears to have been two different part numbers available for most build dates. This may be as simple as Nissan sourcing master cylinders from two different manufacturers - Tokico & Nabco.

Stock model:

Build dates from 8908 to 8911

Part number 46010-05U20

Size 1"

Build dates from 8911 to 9108

Part number 46010-05U00

Size 1"

Build dates from 9108 on

Part number 46010-05U20

Part number 46010-05U00

Size 1"

V-Spec model, ie with Brembo brakes.

Build dates from 9302 on

Part number 46010-05U02

Size 17/16's.

N1 versions.

This gets confusing & may well be incomplete.

Early version appear to have 15/16" master cylinder sizes. I would guess (Note: NOT SURE) that they may well have three outlets rather than the normal two for stock GT-R's & have Sumitomo callipers. The number of ports relates to the presence of ABS. 2 ports for ABS, 3 for Non ABS. n Interestingly they appear to be smaller in size than their equivalent ABS equipped stock or V-spec GT-R's.

Any way:

Build dates 9002 to 9108

Part number 46010-02U00

Build date 9108 on

Part number 46010-02U00

The specification is listed differently for these units but is in Japanese on the spec sheet & I can't read it.

The alternate parts listed are here

Build dates 9002 to 9108

Part number 46010-02U20

Build date 9108 on

Part number 46010-02U20

Later versions had a 1" size.

Build date 9203 on

Part number 46010-05U01 for a Tokico unit.

Part number 46010-05U21 for a Nabco unit.

There may well be more options but that is the limit of my knowledge at present.

Edited by djr81

Sorry if this is a little off topic, but I have a leaky master on my povo pack R32 GTR. I'd like to get it reconditioned, but don't want to do so if it is too small for a 'big brake' upgrade. I'm being told that the R32 V spec / R33 1 1/16 would be better suited for larger piston areas. I'm also being told (on the other contradictory hand) don't bother, the std 1" master will be fine, just get it reco'ed and away you go, std brakes / big brakes doesn't matter.

Any thoughts?

Cheers.

You need to first sort out what callipers you want to run & whether you still want ABS before you select a brake master cylinder.

Keep in mind the Sumitomo calliper has (relative to most other brands other than Brembo) a large piston area.

You need to first sort out what callipers you want to run & whether you still want ABS before you select a brake master cylinder.

Keep in mind the Sumitomo calliper has (relative to most other brands other than Brembo) a large piston area.

Calipers are very likely to be Alcon 6 pots. I guess I should get the Alcon piston area stats and compare to the Sumitomos right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...