Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the quicker you can get it up on the transbrake the better just wire the gas to the transbrake button so you let go of them at the same time

not a bad idea

iv got some new pix on my camera to upload, my boot is finished, and im working on the engine bay a bit more. the harness is all hidden inside the drivers side guard, as are the relays from the std relay box in the engine bay. i wish i did that sooner, the ammount of room it opened up in there was amazing!

sweet build mate, yeh steve is awesome he helped me out a bit with my build ( although now im in qld) you'll be 9s for sure once everything is sorted and suspension set up is sweet.

ben...

sweet build mate, yeh steve is awesome he helped me out a bit with my build ( although now im in qld) you'll be 9s for sure once everything is sorted and suspension set up is sweet.

ben...

thnx man. yeh steves a good bloke, iv never had a problem he cant solve lol. why you in qld now? werent you a gong boy?

<br /><br /><br />

haha thanx bud. just wait til its finished and at powercruise this year!! ( hopefully)

You might like this.BUSTERS 26/30 with T51r.Love the spool of the T51 on the trans brake.Sounds like its about to take off.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmqKrUxOJ4U

You might like this.BUSTERS 26/30 with T51r.Love the spool of the T51 on the trans brake.Sounds like its about to take off.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmqKrUxOJ4U

aahhh the sweet sweet sound of a big snail. hopefully mine with the sidepipe and 2k higher revs will sound as orgasmic at that LOL

aahhh the sweet sweet sound of a big snail. hopefully mine with the sidepipe and 2k higher revs will sound as orgasmic at that LOL

Will you be revving it to 10600rpm?

Not a bad sound for a full exhaust and plumbed back screamer pipe :P

Nice set up 1TUF33 will be great to see her out racing

Will you be revving it to 10600rpm?

Not a bad sound for a full exhaust and plumbed back screamer pipe :P

Nice set up 1TUF33 will be great to see her out racing

Is yours reving to 10600rpm?

Sorry i am about to go slightly off topic :thumbsup:

If so: what prep work have you done to the bottom end? Not talking basics like forgies, balancing, etc. Things like titanium rods?; internally harmonically balanced? (ie: rebalance the crank,rods, piston, etc assembly while assembled in the block); anything else?

Reason i ask:

I am in the process of building a rb25/30: Cams, valve springs, extensive professional head porting, 3 angle grind on valves, greddy plenum, q45 tb, ETM high mount manifold, cp forged piston, REV rods, ATI harmonic balancer, N1 oil pump, H.E. competition race sump, GTR race bearings, etc, etc............... (you start to get a clear picture)

Now with all these components (and obviously all the prep work) i was hoping to have a rev limiter set to 8000rpm. Considering a std rb25 revs to 7400rpm factory, i thought a well built, strong rb25/30 would have no problem with 8000rpm. But my mechanic is hesitant to set the rpm limiter there, due to the longer stroke of the 3ltr and claims that the block would have to be rebalanced internally, once assembled, which costs a few thousand extra (something i am not willing to pay). He explained his concerns about harmonic distortion/frequencies at rpm's above 7000 on a rb30.

Just wanted you opinion on the matter and whether you think my mechanic is being too cautious?

Of course you have to assume that my mechanic knows what he is doing and that the work is of high quality; i for one am obviously certain it is :thumbsup:.

Sorry Al I was only revving to 8600, 1TUF33 said "2k higher revs will sound as orgasmic at that LOL" and I was wondering if he was planning on revving to 10600

Your rev limit of 8000 sounds spot on to me

Thanks BU5TER :P

It obviously depends alot on the power graph too, as it may be useless to rev to 8000rpm. :thumbsup:

I left out the turbo on purpose, as i am using a "baby" turbo for this setup: GT30R

I plan to do alot of motorkahnas/hill-climbs and a few track days, so response has always been my main goal. Hoping for 290-330rwkw with the response better than that of an rb25 hi-flow turbo on a std rb25.

Will you be revving it to 10600rpm?

Not a bad sound for a full exhaust and plumbed back screamer pipe :(

Nice set up 1TUF33 will be great to see her out racing

yours does sound sweet mate, but i didnt think it was revving so hard! i think i was at powercruise when you ripped those powerskids, nice show

Is yours reving to 10600rpm?

Sorry i am about to go slightly off topic :(

If so: what prep work have you done to the bottom end? Not talking basics like forgies, balancing, etc. Things like titanium rods?; internally harmonically balanced? (ie: rebalance the crank,rods, piston, etc assembly while assembled in the block); anything else?

Reason i ask:

I am in the process of building a rb25/30: Cams, valve springs, extensive professional head porting, 3 angle grind on valves, greddy plenum, q45 tb, ETM high mount manifold, cp forged piston, REV rods, ATI harmonic balancer, N1 oil pump, H.E. competition race sump, GTR race bearings, etc, etc............... (you start to get a clear picture)

Now with all these components (and obviously all the prep work) i was hoping to have a rev limiter set to 8000rpm. Considering a std rb25 revs to 7400rpm factory, i thought a well built, strong rb25/30 would have no problem with 8000rpm. But my mechanic is hesitant to set the rpm limiter there, due to the longer stroke of the 3ltr and claims that the block would have to be rebalanced internally, once assembled, which costs a few thousand extra (something i am not willing to pay). He explained his concerns about harmonic distortion/frequencies at rpm's above 7000 on a rb30.

Just wanted you opinion on the matter and whether you think my mechanic is being too cautious?

Of course you have to assume that my mechanic knows what he is doing and that the work is of high quality; i for one am obviously certain it is :/ .

as a matter of fact yes it is all internally balanced, from the stally to the balancer. i sent it all to a shop near me, and he returned the whole setup to me, labelled, in what order it has to be installed etc. im not exactly sure what was done, but i think he basically balanced it all together, not jusst the crank, so to get it all pretty close to spot on. the only thing stopping you from going past 8k i think would be the rb30 crank, from memory they are only semi counter?. my crank is a full counter job, so it may well be able to take the revs better. il ask my old man, maybe he could shed some light. hes a mechanical engineer, adn SHOULD have an idea on these things lol

are proper cages suposed to be press bent like those!?!?

its allowed to be press bent, as long as the distortion of the bend doesnt exceed a set limit over the radius of the bend. its all im the cams rulebook ( which is the same specs as andra use ive been told)

as a matter of fact yes it is all internally balanced, from the stally to the balancer. i sent it all to a shop near me, and he returned the whole setup to me, labelled, in what order it has to be installed etc. im not exactly sure what was done, but i think he basically balanced it all together, not jusst the crank, so to get it all pretty close to spot on. the only thing stopping you from going past 8k i think would be the rb30 crank, from memory they are only semi counter?. my crank is a full counter job, so it may well be able to take the revs better. il ask my old man, maybe he could shed some light. hes a mechanical engineer, adn SHOULD have an idea on these things lol

That sounds like what i have done and what any good engine builder will do. All components get sent to be balanced and matched to minimize harmonic vibrations, etc.

But there is another process that is very expensive and time consuming.

That sounds like what i have done and what any good engine builder will do. All components get sent to be balanced and matched to minimize harmonic vibrations, etc.

But there is another process that is very expensive and time consuming.

yeh it was really extra money i didnt have, but when spending that kind of $ on a motor you want to do it right

while i have this thread going, does anyone have one of those rubber grommets that sit in the injector seat on the inlet runner that seals the injector? i only need one, but if i have to get a set i dont mind!

Anyone????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...