Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I do shave it lol, that's just over a week of growth...such a pain in the ass to maintain :(

They look alright in the pic but I do have a slight zipper effect with the ab split...it's definitely not perfect but I'm not complaining (have seen some shocking splits in pics on the net). What causes it? Is it strictly genetics or does certain exercise play a part in the split too (always wondered what would happen if your situps had an offset to them lol)?

You're right about the standing pic for showing overall BF or lack of. I might take one, I just like this position because it was sitting like this that I could see (and pinch) what little fat I had left on my lower abdomen prior to cutting - it would disappear when I stood up.

Bit late on the whey discussion but I'm using this and always have since I started gyming.

Thoughts?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/5kg-Whey-Protein-WPI-WPC-Powder-CHOCOLATE-/390411818416?pt=AU_Exercise_Accessories&hash=item5ae65b95b0#ht_3320wt_1270

Vanilla tastes fairly average but choc is decent..

Sort of related: what is it called when you pick the barbell up off the ground and in one single motion sweep it up to above your head? This is the way I pick up a barbell when I am starting a military press set. I thought it was some variation of the clean/snatch, but on googling these, they all involve a squat movement at some point...I'm literally deadlifting it from the ground to above my head in one.

That's a power snatch.

You don't have to squat for a snatch and a clean. It's not part of the exercise.

The only reason a person would squat was that so they can get lower to get under the bar as they cannot lift the bar high enough, ie alot of weight.

If the olympic lifters could lift the weight to their chest for a clean on the second movement without having to squat, they wouldn't.

If you don't have to squat to catch a clean or a snatch, don't squat.

Cheers Husky...at least it has a name now.

how does everyone find the Bulk Nutrients products? Notice any actual difference when making the switch?

Recently switched, so will let you know. So far, loving the taste of chocolate and so easy to mix (shake for 10 seconds).

eBay whey looks like the same deal as the other pure wheys; guess its just whether you trust it or not. Prolly the same stuff as BN. I found it interesting that BN gets made in NZ, sent to USA and then sold here? If you follow the labels anyway...

Hey it's not all genetics! 280 situps a week and cutting back on the fast foods...

eBay whey looks like the same deal as the other pure wheys; guess its just whether you trust it or not. Prolly the same stuff as BN. I found it interesting that BN gets made in NZ, sent to USA and then sold here? If you follow the labels anyway...

Hey it's not all genetics! 280 situps a week and cutting back on the fast foods...

Give weighted leg raises a go (in that weird 'chair' kinda thing, can't recall its proper name). Sure it fatigues the quads and works the psoas a little more than abs, but when you've got an 8kg or more dumbbell hanging from your feet without bending the knees, it does a good job of everything :P my very basic ab circuit is these weighted leg raises, to that stupid ab crunch machine, to standing oblique crunches (20kg in ONE hand then swap), to 90 second plank. Repeat.

Also how you liking the wood chops Birds? I've been doing them with the cable up a bit higher, then crunching forward more. Takes the back out of the equation a bit and focusses more on obliques.

Still doing them. I change the angle of the cable and the motion half way through to work different parts (lower back, obliques, abs, abductors)...seems to work well. For me woodchops is a no rest exercise so it's a bit of cardio too. Do one side, do another, then step up the weight and start again with no rest! = dead.

well Uni got on top of me for quite a few months there - back to the beginning :(

starting again in the morning prior to start of new uni semester, havent been to the gym for 4 months now, not good

must try to find a good middle ground between study and 3 weight sessions a week

enjoyed far too much iced coffee of late

as for 'no rest' - thats how Ive always attacked the weight work, no rest as such (30secs between sets at most, and the walk to a new exercise area is rest enough) to keep the heart rate & sweat up, means you dont need to worry about cardio IMO

^Hey, I took 3 months off cause my wrist was farked (still sort of is..). Uni, football games + training and gym... Its hard... Also the reason why I now skip leg days else I just can't run.

Rest thing - I do rest a fair bit between sets.. Don't usually get sweaty after a weights session..

There is such a thing as too little rest. With buggerall rest between sets you can be achieving the same as doing one set until failure. Your muscles will fatigue and "pump" too much before getting properly worn down. Better off slowly breaking them down over time.

A good test of rest times is if you can push out the same number of reps on your max weight for two sets in a row...if the sets are vastly different then you may need to increase rest time. If they are the same you can decrease rest time until you start to see difference. Somewhere in between is the happy spot! As a general rule though, anywhere from 30-90 seconds depending on exercise is a good timeframe.

phew, this thread went a bit ghey there for a second... all this talk of chest shaving and abz brah... lol ;)

seriously though, medicine ball throws, kettlebell movements, are good for core strength and if done as a circuit burn fat as well... no need to do endless crunches, leg raises etc IMHO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...