Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I use Maca with the green Natures own powder stuff.

I like to think its a healthy mid morning drink.

Its easy to use as the dry powders fit in a small Tupperware container so I can just throw it in my work or gym bag and make it up when I want.

The taste is one that you get use to, the green stuff is nice but the maca's nutty flavour is fairly strong and almost overpowers the flavour.

All up it works out to be about $1 per serve.

Do I get results, not sure but I'm feeling healthy, don't need to strangle to many people and take a dump like clock work.

Mix the maca with ovaltine or milo with a bit of skim milk and it tastes awesome

As I'm on leave and its time to mix it up a bit, I've again gone with a Jim Wendler style of program, I've also had a deload on all of the big 4 exercises.

I've gone with the 8 6 3 range with a few accessories and some high rep fluff.

I'm currently almost finished week 2 (6 reps) and it is going well, squats tomorrow may be a issue as I pulled a groin muscle being a idiot with the kids (trying to be the karate kid on the bag after a few Xmas beers).

Multivitamin

Krill oil with glucosamine

ZMA

Pre-workout: Coffee with creatine

During: BCAA with some Blue PowerAde powder stuff

Post: Protein and oats

49 Years

165 cm

85 kg (fat boy atm)

Critique at will.

Had a dexa scan today for fun, currently at 15.1% body fat. Doctor was saying something about old scale and new scale. something about different standards in readings today, but said i was 10-11% on the old scale.

Plans for the next month or so is to do a reverse diet to build up my metabolic rate. Lean gains through the year.

Hopefully put on some more muscle mass and a lower body fat percentage next year

  • Like 1

I want to try one of those scans.

In the meantime I'll just be here having my third week off.

I had one light session attempt last week but pulled up sore so have just been enjoying the break.

Itching to get back.

Had a dexa scan today for fun, currently at 15.1% body fat. Doctor was saying something about old scale and new scale. something about different standards in readings today, but said i was 10-11% on the old scale.

Plans for the next month or so is to do a reverse diet to build up my metabolic rate. Lean gains through the year.

Hopefully put on some more muscle mass and a lower body fat percentage next year

I got a mate to do calipers on me yesterday and said 8% bodyfat but i hate them they are never right i thought i looked about 10-12% but im always my hardest critic.

Blah_Blah if you got a dexa they should give you your daily resting calorie intake. If you know and are good with macros you should be able to do a lean bulk with out putting on fat if your training and cardio and diet is on point. If not see a nutritionist and you will be able to reach your goals easy.

I want to try one of those scans.

In the meantime I'll just be here having my third week off.

I had one light session attempt last week but pulled up sore so have just been enjoying the break.

Itching to get back.

Definitely, get one done, i find it quite interesting

I got a mate to do calipers on me yesterday and said 8% bodyfat but i hate them they are never right i thought i looked about 10-12% but im always my hardest critic.

Blah_Blah if you got a dexa they should give you your daily resting calorie intake. If you know and are good with macros you should be able to do a lean bulk with out putting on fat if your training and cardio and diet is on point. If not see a nutritionist and you will be able to reach your goals easy.

8% is pretty darn ripped.

He showed me a pic of someone on 10% on his machine, and that was INBA competition Mr Physique lean. Ill try find a picture of the exact person that used the machine but he was sorta like this:

alexcarneiro13olympia.jpg

Yeah I track my macro targets at the moment, so diet is pretty much on point :thumbsup:

he is probably a bit leaner than 8% mates that compete have to be 6% or less to be worthy stepping on stage. That lad looks about 6% if you ask me could be wrong. He has a bit of gyno to by the looks of those nipples lol

I have all visible abs and veins even legs calves and veins running up my lower stomach. But not going to get a dexa for a few weeks as i want to get a bit leaner.

he is probably a bit leaner than 8% mates that compete have to be 6% or less to be worthy stepping on stage. That lad looks about 6% if you ask me could be wrong. He has a bit of gyno to by the looks of those nipples lol

I have all visible abs and veins even legs calves and veins running up my lower stomach. But not going to get a dexa for a few weeks as i want to get a bit leaner.

Post up a pic

As a reference point this is me 15.1% bf on the dexa scan yesterday, after a week of festive eating.

69kg morning weight in. 170cms.

10897847_994317210582638_426208768725900

nohomos

I'd be 15% max right now. Got sloppeh hahaha

Holy shit 40% is filth. Doesn't even look like a human torso any more. Featureless blob.

What stats are you?

Maybe we should have an sau 2015 improvement competition :)

So we all know that being fat is bad for your health and you will end up dead sooner, when does being to skinny fall into this group?

My non educated Googling puts it at being under 8% as it starts to screw with your hormones and the ability to heal.

Male ideal healthy: 9-19%

Female ideal healthy: 21-33%

Me, I'm around 20% and happy with it, and I like all foods to much to care.

I am eating a chicken, egg and salad roll right now, washed down with a XXXX Summer, yum.

Being competition lean is definitely not good for you long term. I think being somewhere between 10-20% is not too bad year round, but it depends on what you are wanting. If your big you are still gonna look pretty jacked at 15% or so, just minimal abs

When I was down around 8% body fat, and I'm just guessing based on vascularity and definition according to the pictorial, I was seriously struggling for energy at the gym. I was getting through the sessions, but it was taxing as all shit and I had nowhere near the workout intensity that I had before I started eating "clean" (read: lean meats and vegetables, no to very little junk food).

Also caught a lot more colds - that could just be coincidence, but since I'm now around 11-12%, I feel a whole lot healthier in general. Would probably feel even better with more...humans are meant to have fat, just not too much or too little.

So I don't think it's sustainable in the long term. Pro bodybuilders are seriously fatigued come comp day - add dehydration to the lean body sapped of energy and it's a wonder more don't just faint under the spot lights. But then, don't some professional basketball players hover around 6-7% or something ridiculous for a year round season? Guessing it makes a difference how much muscle mass you have too, as I can only imagine lots of muscle would starve your body of energy?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...