Jump to content
SAU Community

V35 Air Intake


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I take delivery of my new baby next week (2003 manual coupe) + am of course looking at future mods :-)

I was thinking about the OEM air intake. With the current setup on the car, the airbox is already quite open (not fully enclosed like most airboxes) + cold air is being force fed directly into it.

So I was thinking that replacing the stock filter with something like a freer flowing K&N panel filter would be enough, instead of the need for a full cold-air-intake replacement. Obviously there's a greater induction surface area (+ better sound!) with a pod filter, but then there's heat soak to worry about as well. And with the need to enclose the pod so cops don't defect it, we're back to an airbox style setup.

So what are everyone's thoughts, + does anyone have any measured stats on the air intake setup?

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can get a Nismo panel filter as most JDM imports factory airbox is already a good CAI setup.

I had my old RB25DET on my R33 modded with Z32 AFM, FMIC, 16psi and HKS2535GT, and it made 230rwkw (310rwhp), or estimated 270kw/360HP @ engine without requiring any pod filter. That's how good the factory airbox is...

I know on N/A cars the gain may not be that drastic however with a good flow panel filter and a good tune it will be sufficient. There's not really need to switch to pod filter as no high suction power is required as compared to forced induction engines...

I read in an old HPI magazine article that on N/A cars you gotta becareful changing the intake length or size, as doing it wrongly may result in less power. They did some experiment playing with the size of the intake resonator after the airfilter, a very old article, I've thrown away all my HPI magazine when moved house, so can't find it for you anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet. That's what I was thinking :-)

Good to have the comparison you had as well.

I had a pod on my last ride ('95 FTO) + I believe it added response to that, but the stock airbox was fully enclosed + nothing like the V35.

I'll have a look at the Nismo panel you mentioned :-)

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

first, this is a NA car, so intake mods are not going to do anything for performance. you could route a pipe directly to the atmosphere outside the car with no air filter and you might only gain a maximum of 2 or 3 rwkw. its not like on a turbocharged car where massive gains can be seen.

now, the airbox is a great piece of device in general, and the V35 is a good example of these. as you mentioned, there is a good feed of cold air onto the panel from 2 sources, so there's not going to be much to improve on. your idea of a higher-flowing panel filter is a good one, if you feel the need to do something. you definately won't gain any performance from a pod, as heat soak becomes an issue when you remove the airbox.

i would suggest you wait and drive the car as it is first. i had planned on getting a panel filter when igot my V35 but after driving the car with one in (i put hte panel from my R32 into the V35) i notivced no difference in performance or sound compared to the stock paper one. so i just left the stock one in.

as far as sound goes, again, its a NA car and a free-flowing intake isn't going to make huge sucking sounds like it does on a turbocharged car

i would hate for you to have huge expectations of what a "good intake" is going to do and then put one on and notice that for the $200+ you've spent that there is no difference at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though it's not a turbo + massive gains aren't to be expected, I was remembering all that I've read about about a freer flowing engine (intake, extractors, exhaust) makes for a happy engine. Starting off with the filter, then working up to the other mods.

But with the comparisons that you + Rianto mentioned, + from the stock setup I saw on the V35, then it looks like I don't have too much of a decision to make :-)

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2003 silver coupe with the 18"s + brembos.

Double DIN surround done in Japan - I'm replacing the Jap spec head unit with one that works in Aus but.

Suede seats - didn't want the leather as I'm putting seat covers on

Obviously no in-dash TV as I 've got the double DIN - didn't want the in-dash after reading the forums here + seeing the changes required to make it work correctly (didn't want the extra weight of the additional GPS + DVD units ;-) )

Just hangin on delivery next week!!!!!!

Some pics :-)

post-46213-1199947576_thumb.jpg

post-46213-1199947587_thumb.jpg

post-46213-1199947599_thumb.jpg

post-46213-1199947622_thumb.jpg

post-46213-1199947671_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with what has been said about the intake,

however have you guys seen how restrictive the intake pipe on the V35 is (after the filter) compared to the Z?

I'm doing a bit of guessing but could this be one of the contributors to the power diff between the V and Z?

Here's a pic of a stillen copy of the Z tube compared to a stock V35 intake tube.

post-194-1199955940_thumb.jpg

On my auto V35 coupe I changed the intake to the full HKS system and the bum dyno reckons I gained a bit but more so it sounded awesome. On my manual I'm planning on changing the intake tube for the Z one (found one for $20) and just the filter.

Now, you also have guys who have recorded some big gains with a revised tuned intake. There's a member on 350z-tech.com in the Australian section who claims to have achieved (i think) 10-15kw gain with a tuned intake and revised airbox. There's a lot of skepticism but there are also a few who have signed up for one. If i see the same results duplicated on other cars, then i'll be buying one for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no effect on removing the resonator on the intake pipe?

that's a good looking silver one, mine's still in process of import approval, won't land till a while...

it's an auto though, but premium with bose, so can't really swap the head unit unless i find a double din dash trim and loose the bose sound...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warren: Not sure on the seat covers yet - have to look around + see what complements the car + my tastes the best :-)

Bobby: 10-15Kw...!? I can understand the skepticism. You'd definitely want proven dyno recs on that, + a dyno not in shoot-out mode either...

Rianto: I found a surround from Japan if you're interested. AU$122. Found floor mats at the same site ranging from AU$236 - AU$665!!

http://www.japanparts.com/db/partslist.php...=2&small=13

post-46213-1199959484_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got my intake changed, better pipe and pod, also got a Borla Exhaust put in and now awaiting headers to come in.

Definately a better and more powerful response (and sound) compared to previously, only thing I wish I did was dyno it before! and still need to dyno it now, will post up when I do :P

Was thinking of making or purchasing a CAI box for it though, due to the heat soak.

Edited by Pulp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warren: Not sure on the seat covers yet - have to look around + see what complements the car + my tastes the best :-)

Bobby: 10-15Kw...!? I can understand the skepticism. You'd definitely want proven dyno recs on that, + a dyno not in shoot-out mode either...

Rianto: I found a surround from Japan if you're interested. AU$122. Found floor mats at the same site ranging from AU$236 - AU$665!!

http://www.japanparts.com/db/partslist.php...=2&small=13

Well thats the thing, he has dyno graphs on the same day at the same temp apparently all on the same set up.

But still, until i see it on at least 1 other car if not more then I'm a non believer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got my intake changed, better pipe and pod, also got a Borla Exhaust put in and now awaiting headers to come in.

Definately a better and more powerful response (and sound) compared to previously, only thing I wish I did was dyno it before! and still need to dyno it now, will post up when I do :(

Was thinking of making or purchasing a CAI box for it though, due to the heat soak.

what intake do u have?

can u keep me an update on header? coz heard nothing gain on header and the labor time is a killer (at least 5 hours).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, you also have guys who have recorded some big gains with a revised tuned intake. There's a member on 350z-tech.com in the Australian section who claims to have achieved (i think) 10-15kw gain with a tuned intake and revised airbox. There's a lot of skepticism but there are also a few who have signed up for one. If i see the same results duplicated on other cars, then i'll be buying one for sure.

Yeah, I've tried to be really diplomatic about the whole thing but pulling over 10rwkW by changing the intake tube and moving the location of the AFM set off my bs meter.

Considering they said they "tuned the length", but they only had the car for 6 hours. How many different metal intake pipes can you fabricate, install, drive to the dyno shop down the road, strap down onto the dyno, and power run in 6 hours? Even if they did it all via CAD by flow-testing the intake of the VQ35DE just north of the throttle body so a computer could calculate the best tube length and diameter and only require the fabrication of one tube, it would still take a fair amount of time.

The guy also reckons he ran a 1:13 flat on his first time out at Wakefield Park in a dead stock car that he'd only owned for a week or two. Sure, Rick Bates managed a mid 1:12 in it during Motor Magazine's PCOTY....but Bates is a pretty damned good driver with plenty of track experience.

I'm not saying he's intentionally having people on, but its quite possible he's been given the bum steer by others and he's fallen for it. The claims don't resolve well with my experiences with the car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The extractors on our cars take ages to install. I've got a set of TopSpeed headers from UAS, and I think they're good.

I did the extractors and cats at the same time (as well as the Motordyne MREV2), so its impossible for me to say what the headers by themselves did....but I can tell you the engine is generating a lot more torque in the top end with its willingness to go to my new 7200RPM cutout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warren: Not sure on the seat covers yet - have to look around + see what complements the car + my tastes the best :-)

Bobby: 10-15Kw...!? I can understand the skepticism. You'd definitely want proven dyno recs on that, + a dyno not in shoot-out mode either...

Rianto: I found a surround from Japan if you're interested. AU$122. Found floor mats at the same site ranging from AU$236 - AU$665!!

http://www.japanparts.com/db/partslist.php...=2&small=13

Yes I've known the website for quite some time but swapping to that means i'm loosing the bose sound, I'll see how it goes after it landed and complied whether the bose sound is good enough, as I'm not really an audiophile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Butters I can't tell you why but the bigger HKS step 2 cams improved low and mid end immensely. Turbos started spooling about 1k RPM less than before and the idle/vacuum was rock solid, it was an absolute thrill to drive, 3rd gear pulls hit 180kmh where previously only managed 160. Conversely, the milder poncoms in there now have a funky idle making it harder to get off the line, drives poorly in lower revs, laggy and makes less power/torque throughout. Feels better after I swapped the EBC but unless I put it on the Dyno again, I can't say how much better.
    • Hi Sydney kid   do you still selling spring and blistein shocks for Nissan 260rs? Air any suspension upgrades? Please advice     yudy
    • Cams are not needed at this power level, they will create lag. The cam gears are a good idea though.
    • @Murray_Calavera yeah, I guessed as much, cooler temps, more boost, less knock, more timing, hello power. Unfortunately not quite within reach ATM, could upgrade my whole fuel system to support but still wouldn't have E85 to run it 😂  Anyway, I changed cams again, 260/260 poncam B and everything else the same except an EBC upgrade. Now I must say I was quite disappointed with the result as it was like running stock cams (didn't try to dial them in as they're supposed to be optimum already) but after awhile I suspected my new EBC was underperforming not to mention difficult to use. I recently swapped back my old EBC and it drives much better now, boost comes on sooner, more stable, no spikes etc, feels all quicker and faster than with stock cams. Planning to fiddle with the cam gears and see what happens but maybe skip the Dyno as I intend to revert to the HKS cams cos they really made the car come alive; low and mid end was unbelievable and it just wanted to rev to the moon, finally knew what people were raving about, RB26 really loves revs. Anyway, Dyno 03 is quite disappointing, in Dyno 02 although peak power was less and trailed off at the top, the low and mid end improvement more than made up for it.
    • @Darrel It's so tempting to say e85 is borderline magic. It cools the intake charge, so if you're flirting with the edge of the turbos compressor map it helps dramatically cool down the hot air the turbos are pumping. It is very resistant to detonation so you can crank the timing, I don't really want to say you won't be knock limited anymore.... but you probably wont be knock limited anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if you made 20% more power swapping to e85 (provided you have the fuel system to support them, bigger injectors maybe bigger pump etc). 
×
×
  • Create New...