Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey i saw this driving through cannington yesterday afternoon i was on the train home after work and was half asleep looking out the window and spotted it it looks so mean wasnt asleep after seeing it though so i called all my mates to tell them i was that excited

;):banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:

  • 1 month later...

hey guys just letting you know that im im melbourne

and just happens to be for the motor show

yes the one where the 35 gtr will be

only a few hours till it begins

i will be making sweet sweet love to this car and i will put up some pics as soon as i get back

cos i forgot to take the usb cable

anyway cant wait

Hey hows it going everyone?

My name's Josh and i'm an automotive photographer. I mainly photograph exotics (Ferrari, Lamborghini etc) but i snap the occasional GTR from time to time with the R34 GTR my old favourite.

But today i saw my new favourite GTR, the R35... On the street!

This thing has so mush presence and looks ALOT better out of the Fabcar showroom.

Today in Freo i stumbled upon it parked on the side of the road along the cafe strip for a MOTOR Magazine article/photoshoot.

Sadly i was the only person in Freo who actually knew what this that sitting infront of me, was capable of. Everyone who was walking past did exactly that, walk past :D

Anyways, i took heaps of pics so i'll upload a few and if you like them, i'll upload some more.

Cheers, have a good one

Josh

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff9/coc...IMGP7053MY1.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff9/coc...IMGP7075MY1.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff9/coc...IMGP7019MY1.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff9/coc...IMGP7030MY1.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff9/coc...IMGP7107MY1.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff9/coc...IMGP7109MY1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...