Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys & gals - need some advice.

Just got my car back from Revzone today - the guys did a mad job in fitting the guages, and fixing most of the faults (has to go back for abs and aircon work though). However, the mechanic - justin - said that my tyres are not good enough for track work. There is plenty of tread, but on the fronts, the inside of the tyres are wearing out. How much of a problem will it cause (considering that the track day is part of the Driver Dynamics training)?

I heard that I cannot take it to the limit (which i wasnt planning on doing) and that if its raining it will probably be cause problems. The car is already moving towards the right side (very minimal though) when I tested it out at a car park earlier tonight.

The first time i cancelled a track day like this was because there was problems with the car, the second time i cancelled it was because the workshop i took it to didnt do any work on it - hence car was a disaster waiting to happen. And I dont want to cancel this one cos Im dying to go to the track day (mind you, I have already paid a deposit for the march one - but thats ages away :D )

Anyway, any advice would be greatly appreciated :)

cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204880-tyre-condition-for-track-work/
Share on other sites

worn street tires are better than new ones for track work... unless they are down to the canvas you should be fine

if its raining and they are pretty bald you will have problems, but I assume if there is standing water on the track and its your first time out you would just be tippy toeing around anyway

good luck and have fun!

worn street tires are better than new ones for track work... unless they are down to the canvas you should be fine

if its raining and they are pretty bald you will have problems, but I assume if there is standing water on the track and its your first time out you would just be tippy toeing around anyway

good luck and have fun!

Thanks for the reply man - yeah they are not bald, but there is more wear on the insides - got me worried when everyone is saying its best to get roadworthy tires.....

Im still awaiting reply from Kev though - dont want a repeat performance of last time where there is oil all over the track :)

Wear on the inside won't be a problem on the track cos if your cornering like you should be (quickly!) you will be using the outside of the tire anyway... even if your car is lowered there won't be sufficient negative camber (unless you have a/m camber adjustment) ... most street cars scrub the outside of their tires at the track

how many kays have these tires done? maybe post a pic of the tread or email it to Kev, he will be able to tell you

I know your pain, last time I was at one of Kev's Sandown days I got the death rattle and had to push the car outta the pits... there was just sooo much track and so little cars I got carried away, probably should have fit a cool down lap in there somewhere!... oops hehe... ah good times

Wear on the inside won't be a problem on the track cos if your cornering like you should be (quickly!) you will be using the outside of the tire anyway... even if your car is lowered there won't be sufficient negative camber (unless you have a/m camber adjustment) ... most street cars scrub the outside of their tires at the track

how many kays have these tires done? maybe post a pic of the tread or email it to Kev, he will be able to tell you

I know your pain, last time I was at one of Kev's Sandown days I got the death rattle and had to push the car outta the pits... there was just sooo much track and so little cars I got carried away, probably should have fit a cool down lap in there somewhere!... oops hehe... ah good times

yeah man, i just got pics of the tires - will be emailing htem to kev. The tires have been on since I purchased the car, which was in Feb13th 2006 - so they are probably due for change - but still have heaps of tread on them.

Its a crap feeling when you have to push the car out of the pits to the front of the gates.....but at the same time i was glad that the engine didnt need a full rebuild :O

However, I have been shit scared about taking the car to the track cos its been out of action for so long hehe

P1020604.jpg

P1020603.jpg

Are those RE01s? If so you'll be fine...

Are you the guy that had his sump plug come off at the track last year and left a trail of oil all over the track?

those are re01s.

yeah im the "sump plug" guy :D

Just heard that it will be raining tomorrow too ;)

dont take everything you hear as gospel. you know if your really going to be pushing the car to the edge. then i might say yeah go get some new or decent 2nd hand tyres that will provide grip. though if they are really old tyres they might feel ok in the dry but in the wet if u dont have tread to disperse the water they will feel worse than they should be.

the ones in the pic are fine. they are not at the limiter markers so drive on. or drift on them :thumbsup:

next time out get a new set and u will be set.

dont take everything you hear as gospel. you know if your really going to be pushing the car to the edge. then i might say yeah go get some new or decent 2nd hand tyres that will provide grip. though if they are really old tyres they might feel ok in the dry but in the wet if u dont have tread to disperse the water they will feel worse than they should be.

the ones in the pic are fine. they are not at the limiter markers so drive on. or drift on them :cheers:

next time out get a new set and u will be set.

actually yeah, the tires went good today - even in the wet, they performed well. I was very very happy with them - but they still need to be aligned and balanced.....

But the thing is i didnt push the limits - i think the dry track i was doing maybe 70%, the wet i was doing 50%?

either way, i was happy with them overall :ninja:

all good :)

did they have a little comp at the end of the day?

nah not a comp as such, but they put us learner babies with the track specialists - and that was an interesting experience. There was always someone fast behind me and that was daunting.

but atleast I can say that my car pulled away from a Porsche.................................... Boxster :D

I was speaking to this guy who did Drift courses and stuff in his 200sx - he said I should perhaps look at getting better performance tires next time. I think he mentioned S02's and RE01R or something......though he was running bridgestones at the front and falkens at the rear.....

The other thing that I need to look at is getting bigger brakes for the fronts and coilovers (i think my rhf suspension is wearing out)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...