Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 569
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

is there anything we need to look out for if we are going to get this logbooked in sports sedans?? anyone (dunc , i know your building one)

cheers russ

I think you'll be alright. 'floorpan vehicles' have to be based on the standard floorpan rather than a spaceframe chassis. tick. 4.2 says that in this case the floorpan is deemed to be the chassis. 4.2 (vii) says "the chassis, sub-frame and all body components other than the shape of the external coachwork are free."

unless there's a seperate section for awd vehicles that overrides this rule, but I don't see one.

log book it now in case the eligibility rules do change! Doesn't need to be finished or inspected to be log-booked.

cheers thanks for that Harry

BTW have i told you how much i love your car!! and i would buy it if my wife wouldnt leave me :D

thanks mate. I'm thinking of pulling the ads actually. got a better paying job starting next week and looks like there's a bit of overtime to be had as well, so I think I'll just tighten the belt for a few months and keep the 1200. Might not be able to play until later in the year though...

Ben, keeps fumes etc out of cabin just like the front one is spose to.

I;ts not just the fumes but should be water tight, in the case of a roll over or tail end hit to contain

fuel spillage, last year my race car failed scrutineering at qld raceway as i had gaps around the dry sump lines guess what lots of silastic fixed in 15 min.

Russ,

Thanks for the pics. I'll post some tomorrow.

They are remarkably similar, with just a few differences which don't amount to much. My only comment would be that you probably should have taken the doorway crosses up to the bends on the main hoop and on the a pillars, they are your weekest points. More a safety issue than a rigidity issue, and since this will likely not be in too many scenarios where other car collisions can occur, it's not much of a problem.

I am planning do to the rear cradle point just in front of the rear wheel arches, but I'm going to mount them differently to the cage. I'll show you tomorow.

Have you though of putting a second straigh bar under the dash below the steering arm. Only way I can see to get the box effect.

Mark

you don't need to seal the rear of the car, you just need to seal the fuel system off from the passenger compartment. Neil's car for instance had the fuel tank where the passenger would have been, and just had ally sheet blocking it off from the cabin

hey Mark

i think dave was thinking about putting a second bar under the dash but i think decided against it ( not sure why, though probably more to do with berry wants the bloody thing home to get stuck into building it:) )

it will be good to see your take on it.

and you are right, not sure whether the r34 will ever run as a sports sedan or just purely time attack ( which was original plan) , he has kept it low so we can get in and out a bit easier but i guess you never know when someone is going to try and come throught the drivers door, especially being carbon.

cheers russ

i think the cage should be pretty strong , i have seen his worked tested out many times before, as i used to mechanic for stewart reid a rally competitor & he tested out quite a few of dave's cages!! :D

including this one , second car in the vid (white evo 6) in tassie http://www.compfused.com/directlink/281/

Edited by giant

I have proof (unfortunately), sitting out in my front yard, that just about any cage with the basics will keep you safe as long as there's no direct impact. The cage in my now defunct combined touring car was fairly basic, but survived 2 good crashes without any damage at all.

The first had a lot of up and down impact as I hit a few hard ditches on the way down the hill with the car still upright and the parts that were damaged were the front and rear when the cage didn't go.

The second time it rolled 6 or 7 times and despite every panel being damaged, the cage is unmoved and unbent. The skin from the roof is actually molded around the cage so that you can clearly see the top and cross bar across the top.

I guess the moral of the story is once you've got your main hoop, a pillars and a few crosses in, the rest of the cage should be designed around rigidity of the chassis. The weakest point of the cage in terms of safety is always going to be a side impact on the doors, which you can't really do much about because the driver gets in the way of a bar across the middle!

Mark

I have proof (unfortunately), sitting out in my front yard, that just about any cage with the basics will keep you safe as long as there's no direct impact. The cage in my now defunct combined touring car was fairly basic, but survived 2 good crashes without any damage at all.

The first had a lot of up and down impact as I hit a few hard ditches on the way down the hill with the car still upright and the parts that were damaged were the front and rear when the cage didn't go.

The second time it rolled 6 or 7 times and despite every panel being damaged, the cage is unmoved and unbent. The skin from the roof is actually molded around the cage so that you can clearly see the top and cross bar across the top.

I guess the moral of the story is once you've got your main hoop, a pillars and a few crosses in, the rest of the cage should be designed around rigidity of the chassis. The weakest point of the cage in terms of safety is always going to be a side impact on the doors, which you can't really do much about because the driver gets in the way of a bar across the middle!

Mark

Im sorry to hear you had to suffer the misfortune of these types of things to be able to speak from experience on them.

Adam.

Both, but not enough of either in the last little while for my liking. I'm trying to put some effort into getting both cars up and running and getting back out there. I knot that when I start getting tempted to get my road car back on the track that withdrawls are starting to set in.

haha! bloody drivers put a bar there anyway! :)

shit mark! have you been rallying too? or circuit

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...