Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Ive been scrolling the forums for infomation directly about Injectors but not much is about the differences with them.

Its pretty obvious the more CC, the more fuel they squirt and the higher you go, the more HP you will be aiming for.

Im looking for R34 Replacements for a GTT to power a highflow so I dont really need a massive injector, I wont be running crazy boost so really only want to run a 555 or 700ish set incase I want to eventually update the R34 turbo.

Ive seen HKS, Nismo, Sard, Blitz and so on, is there really a difference in quality with those jap brands? Why is Sard more expensive than Nismo?

Finally what should I get? most people go with nismo from what I find any reason for that?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205679-whats-the-go-with-injectors/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No r33 are side feed, R34 are top feed

You can not use gtr or s15 injectors as suggested.

I have just fitted some blitz 525cc in my neo stagea. Have had it tuned 2 weeks ago with a power FC. Works great

$699 set from slide. I got mine thru greenline cost me under $600 del.

They come with new plugs, but they are not needed. I had to get new o rings from a mobile injector guy ($20 on a sunday) to suit the fuel rail. Pretty sure the 350z uses the same type of injector, that's why the plugs and the wrong o rings supplied with them. The injectors are approx 8mm longer than the standard ones and need to get the 2 supplied spacers from blitz which lifts the fuel rail up.

The nismo might be a better fit but cost $200 more.

Attached is a photo from yahoo auctions, which shows the alloy spacers and new o rings needed

post-14923-1202814981_thumb.jpg

Well ive investigated a few options, Seems Nismo only make a 480CC compatable with the ER34.

For my application of highflow turbo, perhaps at most 240-250rwkw would this be enough flow? I would assume so but need confirmation.

Ive also decided to bring in a HKS fuel pump capable of 250L a hour ( i read the same pump for a 240sx was rated at 165psi??), I would assume it would not suffer leaning out from higher boost PSI as its HKS (it is also direct drop in like tomei) can anyone confirm as I cannot find statistics on its claims (I would assume its underclaimed because its HKS)

My friend runs it on a R33 with no issues, anyone else?

Edited by DECIM8

Alright then, Seems greenline are the cheapest option but dont sell nismo.

Again ill just ask will 480cc be enough for my application? if stocks are handling 200kw I dont see why 480 wouldnt handle 250rwkw

check out Deatschwerks in the states

they may do topfeed Rb25det injectors

forget the dodgy secondhandies... if you really want redrilled injectors get em done locally for ALOT LESS.

IN r34 BLITZ or NISMO are the go .

The Deatschwerks ones are great i have been using them for about 1 year now with no problem what so ever. if they are put in the right way you will not have a problem. Another good thing is that the std ecu can run them as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...