Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey found a turbo kit pretty cheap, its basically monsta gear but the turbo is not, it still appears to be a cheap sh*t knock off.

anyway, i'm lead to believe that these cheap turbos have proven to be so unreliable through lack of balancing, but the one im looking at seems as though it has.

now, question is, are these cheap shit turbos not balanced at all, or do they still get balanced, just badly? if the crap ones dont get balanced, well then im faithful that this turbo might have some life in it

endlighten me!

cheers,

Ben

PS - first posted with 'dont bother, your wasting your time' and not backing it up with something, gets kicked in the face lol :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/
Share on other sites

They are all poorly balanced.

Poor materials to make the wheels, bearings.

And hence either shit a bearing and die, or a wheel hits something, or it breaks down under pressure

Use at your own risk - the poor man pays twice

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3704220
Share on other sites

i have heard many stories where these cheap ebay turbos go through peoples engines and then they are up for more than just a new turbo but a rebuild too. If you want a cheap turbo buy second hand from a trusted source. Or look into the KKR range.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3705837
Share on other sites

i have heard many stories where these cheap ebay turbos go through peoples engines and then they are up for more than just a new turbo but a rebuild too. If you want a cheap turbo buy second hand from a trusted source. Or look into the KKR range.

turbo + manifold + external gate + dump + speedflow oil feed and return line for $400.... not much else in that price range.

i do believe what everyone else way saying, i just thought they werent balanced, and this one was balanced, so thought it might be a goer, hence this thread. might give it a go anyway, then bolt on a decent turbo later when it lets go... its just so damn cheap lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3706186
Share on other sites

turbo + manifold + external gate + dump + speedflow oil feed and return line for $400.... not much else in that price range.

i do believe what everyone else way saying, i just thought they werent balanced, and this one was balanced, so thought it might be a goer, hence this thread. might give it a go anyway, then bolt on a decent turbo later when it lets go... its just so damn cheap lol

That price would cover the lines and (with some change) and nothing else!! You have 100% of people saying they are crap and will damage your car, and you have 0% saying they are a reliable way to make power.

How many cars in the various power up threads are using these ebay turbos?

How many dirt cheap car parts are proven to work well and last?

How often does the old addage "You get what you paid for" ring true?

Do you have the cash to pay for the (worst case) scenario engine rebuild?

Can you not find another $400 to get a KKR turbo?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3706221
Share on other sites

so you think i can get manifold, dump pipe, external gate, speedflow lines, and a KKR turbo for $800? ever heard that saying 'tell 'im hes dreamiinnn'

a few guys on the VL forums have used the cheap turbos to success, one guy built 6 different cars all with monsta gear and as far as i know they are all still running around, one was making ~260rwkw too. i asked him and he told me that monsta have turned to sh*t in more recent times.

im not trying to say they're great turbos, im asking why they arent, read my posts again.

and from all the threads i've read, across numerous forums, i have persoanlly found more people having success with them than those having failures. and by this i mean people who have actually used em, not 'my friends cousins dog knew a bloke that saw it on tv'

PS- can i afford a rebuild? no. can i afford a $100 motor to replace a f*cked one? yes

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3706528
Share on other sites

Stick with the big brands like Garrett/HKS/Trust etc...... they all use the latest technology and the finest materials available.

Monsta/KKR etc are all the same chinese turbos with high failure rates. But if you really want to get one then feel free too but dont post here when the shaft shatters/warps and compressor blades are thrown into your engine scratching bores bores beyond repair, damaging pistons, ruining valves. Some people may have been lucky enough to have had turbos that have survived so far but its not a risk i would ever take with my car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3706589
Share on other sites

you could buy the kit sell the turbo and get a kkr to throw on the mani.

i personally know of a daily driven/drift car , http://www.driftgarage.com.au/ ,the owners personal s13 is running a kkr 430 and the turbz is fine.

also they are a distributer of them.

tell luis, craig with the white R33 sent you. also mentiion skylines australia.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209453-ebay-turbos/#findComment-3706800
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...