Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi sau members :D

i just bout this car not long ago nd not sure wot these rims are

there 245 at the back so got sum rubber on them

1 of the guys from jaxs tires recon there 2000grand just rims

is that true? aprently there import trust rims but didnt no they mad rims :woot: .

bcause looking 2 sell nd get 18'' or 19''

please help thanks

post-46453-1205062020_thumb.jpg

post-46453-1205062108_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209649-help-with-these-rimss-s/
Share on other sites

they look like URAS NS-01 or Koya Driftek.

What is the offset + width of the rims?

The URAS had limited sizes available, whereas the koya's had more options of different width/offsets.

Koya have recently released a 18inch design

www.autoshop.com.au

they are a decent rim, at least they arn't 20"chromies or you'd have everyone telling you off around here...

I like em... they probably arn't the lightest you can find and they may not give all girls wet panties but they're cool by me....

How wide are they, 245 on the rear of skyline ain't that big... I have 235 on the front 255 on the rear others have up to 275 but tyre width aint everything and you can go too wide, there is also a slight cost factor in tyres as well...

reckon there ns01s.

the drift teks spokes dont "wrap" back inwards that much...

if you pulled one off, should (if there NS-01s) have a sticker on the back displaying widths, offsets etc...

i reckon it looks good with em on man, just needs to go an inch lower :D

BEE_R*, URAS NS-01's and Koya Drifteks all look similar.

If they's NS-01's or Drifteks - $$1200 a set new...

If they're BEE-R's, Which arent produced anymore, over $2200 a set.

The Verdict - URAS NS01's, in 8's and 9's, +30 offset.

Drifteks have a slightly different centre, and the BEE-R's have different spoke widths/angles.

thanks for the help boys..

ill get u back with the offset nd stuff like that..

lol i no 1 nch wud suit it but i scrape enough as it is lol

there still alright 4 17'' but i wud like 18'' version :thumbsup::)

yer im looking 4 rear pods:s havnt got them yet

yer i no fresh on my greens :thumbsup:

theres loop holes in the system u just gota find it;)

im aloud 2 drive it

with the help of my dad (skyline enthusiest)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...