Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You folks are too bias. The Z06 was faster.

The Z06 did 0-100 in 8.5 seconds and the GTR did it in 8.9.

The GTR did better 0-100-0, but they had a better reaction time in the GTR (time between WOT and hitting brake pedal).

GT-R: 0-100 = 8.9, 100-0 = 4.3, accel to brake reaction time = 0.6

Z06: 0-100 = 8.5, 100-0 = 4.5, accel to brake reaction time = 1.0

Thus, if you subtract the difference in reaction times, the Z06 was not only faster 0-100, but it's faster 0-100-0 also!

The Z06's lead would've been even larger had they kept going (the article mentioned that the Z06 was accelerating harder past 100mph....this also hurt its braking time).

The Z06 is even more impressive because it has inferior tires and hit the market a full THREE years before the GTR.

0-100-0 implies that you'll start timing from the moment the car accelerates up to 100mph and finish timing once it reaches a complete stop. Thats not very complicated, is it? Last time I checked 13.9 < 14.0 :thumbsup:

Seriously though, can't you just appreciate that they are both great cars and are fast enough?

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

0-100-0 implies that you'll start timing from the moment the car accelerates up to 100mph and finish timing once it reaches a complete stop.
Comments like these usually mean the GTR accelerated faster:
yep gtr outsprints the Z06!
Did I hear him say that it outran the Z06 ??

I didn't know a sprint and "outrunning" included stopping....

Regardless, their reaction time in the Z06 explains why the GTR was a tenth quicker 0-100-0. The reaction time was 0.4 slower in the Z06, thus given an equal reaction time the Z06's time would've been 0.3 better. Getting the same same reaction time is unlikely - kinda like getting the same reaction time in the 1/4-mile on back-to-back runs. The human factor just happened to favor the GTR. You can claim that as a victory, but it is definitely a hollow one.

Additionally, they said the Z06 was accelerating past 100mph faster (more momentum). Also, the driver had just had to change to 3rd to get to 100 which meant it was more difficult to judge when to brake.

Edited by edwardhaskell
Comments like these usually mean the GTR accelerated faster:

I didn't know a sprint and "outrunning" included stopping....

Regardless, their reaction time in the Z06 explains why the GTR was a tenth quicker 0-100-0. The reaction time was 0.4 slower in the Z06, thus given an equal reaction time the Z06's time would've been 0.3 better. Getting the same same reaction time is unlikely - kinda like getting the same reaction time in the 1/4-mile on back-to-back runs. The human factor just happened to favor the GTR. You can claim that as a victory, but it is definitely a hollow one.

Additionally, they said the Z06 was accelerating past 100mph faster (more momentum). Also, the driver had just had to change to 3rd to get to 100 which meant it was more difficult to judge when to brake.

You know what, they're just cars. If you can't figure out that many people on this forum are CAR enthusiasts and can appreciate many types of performance cars (including the Z06) then you need to read threads other than this one.

yes it annihilated the opposition, it took them 3 cars and still couldn't touch the GTR.

drag race was a little dodgy though, I think I'd like to see an acutal 1/4 mile with the computer shot in the head.

You folks are too bias. The Z06 was faster.

The Z06 did 0-100 in 8.5 seconds and the GTR did it in 8.9.

The GTR did better 0-100-0, but they had a better reaction time in the GTR (time between WOT and hitting brake pedal).

GT-R: 0-100 = 8.9, 100-0 = 4.3, accel to brake reaction time = 0.6

Z06: 0-100 = 8.5, 100-0 = 4.5, accel to brake reaction time = 1.0

Thus, if you subtract the difference in reaction times, the Z06 was not only faster 0-100, but it's faster 0-100-0 also!

The Z06's lead would've been even larger had they kept going (the article mentioned that the Z06 was accelerating harder past 100mph....this also hurt its braking time).

The Z06 is even more impressive because it has inferior tires and hit the market a full THREE years before the GTR.

You guys know good old Ed here is from the corvette forum, just coming over here to justify why they lost with some lame number crunching BS. Hey Ed, go back to your pushrod V8 farm plow loving. Yeeehaw

The ZR1 corvette will probably top the R35

Agreed. The V spec will be more of a competition for the ZR-1.

The Z06 is an aweosme piece of machinery which did hit the mark a few years before the R35 did. In saying that the GTR is slightly slower at the high end of the scale but at those speeds who really cares :D

Edited by Zoggy
You guys know good old Ed here is from the corvette forum, just coming over here to justify why they lost with some lame number crunching BS. Hey Ed, go back to your pushrod V8 farm plow loving. Yeeehaw

hahhahahaaha

i lol'd :)

last time i checked, the Z06 and the GTR both had steering wheels....

i'm pretty sure cars are meant to turn aren't they? although judging from some of these linked threads and comments in here, i'm not sure everyone understands that.. i must admit, it's hard to get your head around...

>_<

You folks are too bias. The Z06 was faster.

The Z06 did 0-100 in 8.5 seconds and the GTR did it in 8.9.

The GTR did better 0-100-0, but they had a better reaction time in the GTR (time between WOT and hitting brake pedal).

GT-R: 0-100 = 8.9, 100-0 = 4.3, accel to brake reaction time = 0.6

Z06: 0-100 = 8.5, 100-0 = 4.5, accel to brake reaction time = 1.0

Thus, if you subtract the difference in reaction times, the Z06 was not only faster 0-100, but it's faster 0-100-0 also!

The Z06's lead would've been even larger had they kept going (the article mentioned that the Z06 was accelerating harder past 100mph....this also hurt its braking time).

The Z06 is even more impressive because it has inferior tires and hit the market a full THREE years before the GTR.

The Z06 is a faster top end car. Power to weight ...easy math. There are fair whack of other cars faster than the Z06 and GTR again in this area.

However getting the pig off the line or round a corner fast without really having to get it perfect makes the car nice too don't you think?

Nice to buy a car with good traction and handling out of the box, we all like that. The factory don't hand the Z06 to you like that at present (as good as it could be). They do give you the GTR that way. Always sucks when the factory skimp on tyres etc. but, then thats what stock means.

There have been plenty of reviews now on various great cars compared to the new R35 from all over the world. There is now a very basic agreement that it's the best bit of kit you can buy for the price replacing the very worthy Z06 for 'bang for buck'.

Z06 is a great performer but, it's out gunned by the GTR in all but, outright straight line speed. Even then the gap is still very narrow. But, straight line speed isn't worth much in the equation I've owned a few cars that make the GTR and Z06 look like nerd toys for straight line speed. The same cars however would be in the dust behind the Z06 trying to go around a corner or stop.

Admit the GTR is great and if your not going to buy a Z06 a pretty good second option or visa versa.

last time i checked, the Z06 and the GTR both had steering wheels....

i'm pretty sure cars are meant to turn aren't they? although judging from some of these linked threads and comments in here, i'm not sure everyone understands that.. i must admit, it's hard to get your head around...

:rofl:

The point of the evo article was to race the best accelerating car (Corvette) in a straight line, the best road car (the Audi R8) on the road and the most track based weapon (the GT3) on the track to see how the GTR stacks up against the best of everything. It did a damn good job.

When I say the "best" I mean Evo's version of the best when you exclude straight out super cars.

I was actually most surprised to hear that it was faster than the Audi on bumpy Welsh roads and that the driver of the GTR needed to feather the throttle on the straight to allow the Audi to keep up, so that he could see how hard the driver was pushing to keep up.

It will be interesting to see how fast the v-spec is. Just imagine if it lost even 200kg's and gained 50 horses.

Nissan have done an outstanding job, as the article says it is the new benchmark.

Cheers

Comments like these usually mean the GTR accelerated faster:

I didn't know a sprint and "outrunning" included stopping....

Regardless, their reaction time in the Z06 explains why the GTR was a tenth quicker 0-100-0. The reaction time was 0.4 slower in the Z06, thus given an equal reaction time the Z06's time would've been 0.3 better. Getting the same same reaction time is unlikely - kinda like getting the same reaction time in the 1/4-mile on back-to-back runs. The human factor just happened to favor the GTR. You can claim that as a victory, but it is definitely a hollow one.

Additionally, they said the Z06 was accelerating past 100mph faster (more momentum). Also, the driver had just had to change to 3rd to get to 100 which meant it was more difficult to judge when to brake.

This is the thing about yank cars, all you seem to care about is how fast you can make it go in a straight line....

Cars have steering for a reason. Its a wounder people dont just replace drag strips with rails and race trains?

This is the thing about yank cars, all you seem to care about is how fast you can make it go in a straight line....

Cars have steering for a reason. Its a wounder people dont just replace drag strips with rails and race trains?

I love how ppl write of the Corvette saying sit doesnt handle. Its Australian built brakes are about the best steel brakes you can get on a production car. They are brilliant and fade free. And the car handles very well. How else can a Z06 be only 4 seconds slower over a lap of a 20km track, all with no traction control or 4wd or other gayness?

The GTR is perhaps the best all round performance car getting around at the moment. Especially for the dollars. But why does that mean ppl cant give credit to cars that do similar things differently? Hell the Vette is as quick as a GT2 Porsche...so how can you be so stoooopid as to say they dont handle :rofl: But consider for a second the asking price of the Z06, cosnider its only rwd and doesnt have a gay automatic gearbox, instead 3 pedals and a real gearbox which i understand is a cavemans way of changing gears these days, and a slower way to hurl the car down the road....and tell me the Z06 isnt a blindingly fast car. Hell getting back to the 20km Ring example, how many gearchanges are there in that lap? There could be the 4 seconds there? So you cant say they dont handle!!!!

At the end of the day they are all quick enough for me...it comes down to styling and sound for me. So this

bluedevil.jpg

Versus this

20071024_gtrworld_051.jpg

And go watch the Top Gear adn 5th Gear vids of the Z06...the thing sounds great and is a hoot to drive.

I had a mate recently go to the US and rent out a z06... Just by going on what he said, it didnt handle to save itself. Prehaps he was wrong, I doubt it as he drove it around for a week, and when hes here he owns a 02ish commodore, but feh.

There yank tanks that will never be availible here. I dont really get why we dont import more, I mean we import enough grey imports from japan right? But you never really see much in the way of yankee cars. Not that I mind, I dont really like them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great work! Give it a clean up with some Emery paper, and I'd run a thread die over the threads too to clean them up. It will make reinstall much easier, and also life easier for the next time it needs to come out.
    • I'm not a fan of high humidity, it's one reason I don't mind being further inland out Ipswich, except the last 3 odd years, the drought broke, and it won't stop raining, which is making the humidity nearly unbearable when the rains are in during summer! For me, my body hates the cold, once the cold sets into my body, I'm totally screwed. I end up with severe muscle spasm in my back/shoulder muscles, and it feels like someone is trying to tear the muscles out. I have no issues with it getting stupid hot, so long as the humidity goes away. So the last 3 years as above, have been woeful! Ha ha. However, June 1st, and I'm only just converting from shorts and a tee, to long pants and a t shirt. And that's mainly as it's a bit wet and miserable and I wanted to work on a car.
    • I much prefer colder weather to hot weather, and especially prefer cold to hot and humid, Goulburn does gets pretty warm in the hotter months, but, I've found the humidity there is not as painful as even Sydney, the humidity up north is to oppressing for this old rooster  In saying this, it does get rather "nippy" in Goulburn for early morning, late in the evening walks, but nothing that a layer or two, some thermal gloves, and a beanie doesn't fix to make it an enjoyable experience, which is much more bearable to me than the oppression of heat and humidity,  especially at night when your trying to sleep If I recall correctly, a "wise man" once said that the "Southern Tablelands" was gods country, and I will not argue that point with him for the fear of a "permaban" LOL In car part related news: My intake is currently in Botany getting processed for the last leg of its shipping journey to my door   
    • Had a go at the stuck crush tube this afternoon. Tried things like grips and a chain wrench first but wouldn't just twist straight off. So got to work with a drill. Started small and kept a depth stop on to make sure I didn't drill into the bolt. Made a line of drill holes all the way up and enlarged them. Then a combination of chisel and Dremel to split it all the way up. Levered the split to get oil in there and eventually it gave a bit while levering. Worked it back and forth with loads more oil till it was spinning freely, then with grips I could work it downwards and off. And no significant damage to the bolt (not by me anyway - just the 27 years of rust)
    • Well, I'm tired. I'm tired because about 4PM yesterday, before today's appointment someone immediately bought my bumper. They couldn't get it any other day as they're on the way back to NSW. So I had to do that big GTR conversion I had been planning. Unfortunately, the information on SAU about what you need and how this is done is incomplete. So what should be a simple bolt on affair, yeah, it's not. Did you know if you use all GTR items the bonnet won't close? This little manuever sent me into about 1am the night before trying to dodge a way to get it closed. I will have to revisit this in the next few days  - or maybe not, I may let a body shop figure it out. It all needs to come up and my motivation to pull the bumper off is low. It also seems to hit things in the bay where the GTT bonnet didn't. Yes I used 100% new OEM GTR items. Today, I had the joy of driving to the dyno looking like this: Given I had roughed in the fuel and given sensible but pretty conservative timing, I didn't really bet on having the car drive out any real difference than when it drove in. Sadly due to a miscommunication and laptop fun and games (and almost bricking the dongle, prayers and firmware updates indeed), I ended up using HP Tuner credits to licence the car that was already licenced. So in the end my laptop was used. It turns out my butt dyno is still well calibrated after all this time. The 325kw was on 74% Ethanol, the 313kw line was on 98. The other line is the 'before' line which was 281kw. While the numbers are pretty low, they're pretty in line with what you'd expect. Even if US dynos bump the whole result up about 50KW, gaining 10-15% is similar gains.  The curve of the cam is pretty much spot on with what was discussed as well. All this said, it still feels bad to not see the number you secretly want to see. Even if the car drove great beforehand, and I knew pretty confidently the car would drive out much the same way it drove in due to the nature of a wellish dialled in LS1 not gaining much if anything at all from being tuned from where it was. As expected, the car isn't particularly sensitive to running it at anywhere between 12.0 and 13.0 - And the initial timing at 20deg and 12.0 made 308KW. So 3 degrees of timing, and leaning it out to 12.7 for 5kw, anything above stopped giving any benefit until E85 (which has an additional 2 deg as before). Car itself behaved entirely fine. I found out that 100C = 1.15V! IAT at about 7pm was 19C. I might mess with the bonnet mounting.. but given the REO NEEDS TO BE CHOPPED TO FIT A GTR BAR this is possibly something I may leave gathering (more) dust until it returns to paint jail.
×
×
  • Create New...