Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The 3.4 should be very interesting, did you stick with 86.5mm bore and what style/shape of rod did you chose?

I presume you've made it so its a drop in kit for a stock block?

Rob

Edited by R.I.P.S NZ
The pistons are 20 thou over so ( 86.5 ), they will also be available in 40 ( at some point ).

The rods are a custom H Beam.

Drop in kit for stock block is the aim :-)

Cool, what is the actual cc rating with the 86.5mm bore?

Rob

pffft. whatervaa......... just anticipating someone thats prepared to spend 6k on a rotating assembly might want oil squirters. not me but im not everyone.

just have a japlish disclaimer, oil of the squirter instalation faliure...

I have never had a RB26 in the 240z, its always been a RB30, stock block, stock crank, RIPS wet sump etc and anyone who says a stock 30 crank won't rev hard or is limited to 7500 etc is talking rubbish

http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=nHLfRseF_F4

http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=G6qtA0_kQUc

9500-10,000 rpm during burnout

Rob

everytime i see this 'cocaine' car on the strip i get goose bumps - sounds better than a moaning hottie :blink:

to get a comp ratio here is 1 formula i work with

bore x stroke (bore =86.5mm stroke =95mm)

86.5 x 85.5 / 4 =1870.5625

1870.5625 x 3.142 x 95 = 558344.2006

558344.2006 / 1000 = 558.3442

litres

558.3442 x 6 =3350.0652 (the cubic centremetres of the block)

3350.0652 / 1000 = 3.3500

Deck height

i wont be running one but the formular is the same as the bore x stroke formular just replace the stroke with the deck height measurement

Head Gasket

I HAVE NOT REMEMBERED A MEASURED HEAD GASKET THIS IS A ROUGH GUESS

similar 2 the bore x stroke just replace the stroke with the squashed thickness of head gasket and measure the bore of the gasket, or could always CC it with a burette

i.e

87 x 87 / 4 =1892.25

1892.25 x 3.142 x 0.9=5350.9045

5350.9045 / 1000 =5.3509

Head CC

mines 62cc's atm

Piston dish/dome

if i get the kit id run a 12cc dome

add deck height, head gasket, head cc's, piston dish cc's (minues if dome)

0 + 5.3509 + 62 - 12= 55.3509

add the bore x stroke with the above

55.3509 + 558.3442 = 613.6951

devide answer with the above

613.6951 / 55.3509 = 11.08

11.08:1 is the compression ratio id be running

congratulations rob!

and u have this car for sale!? why sell such a beast

I want to get into something lighter, its about 200kg over weight for the Pro Import class I run in but I don't want to strip it out to be a full race car, as it is, it still has glass windows (except doors), steel hatch etc, just needs headlights and wipers back in and its road legal again for someone else.

Rob

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with no BOV you will have issues unless the MAF is a hot film type like the R35 which has some design features to deal with reversion. Hot wire MAFs are very sensitive.
    • So i just change the (whatever is inside ma original MAF and slide the R34 MAF (it is gonna fit right in? ) and somewhere on the hot side a BoV...i presume that would be vented to the atmo? I just "trying" to understand...maybe my mechanic would know this   I would not mind(even prefer) to run stock BoV cuz it is way more than fine but i do not have that and only pipeing what is left is oem J pipe ... I will be running Blitz fmic(to fit oem one side style) and i gonna need custom pipes cuz i do not have rest of those pipes and hoses... But i am want standalone ECU. Only choice i have atm is Nistune...but that is not gonna cut it right?I dont know what Nistune can and cant do... I know you guys know Link and Haltech...but whatabout ECUmaster? I know guys in here run those but i literally do not know about that and do not know differences... Just know to take whatever "my" tuner can work on.  
    • Is that the blue one rpm?  
    • Update 2: Today I'm f**king pissed. Some of you probably saw my thread that I opened shortly after joining this forum, "urgently need expert/experienced opinion", in which I discussed the possibility of a porous RB26 engine block which I also found hard to believe. Currently both turbos are out since the shitty braided line that was installed by whoever fitted the GT28 turbos leaked oil onto the exhaust. Today while working on the cam covers to put new gaskets and half moons in, I cleaned the side of the engine block with brake cleaner. Some time later I saw that it was still glistening with oil or coolant so I dried that off. But it was wet again shortly after. Verdict: I'm royally screwed. What you can see here (hopefully, despite shit resolution), circled in red, is a crack above the turbo oil feed. Extent is a few cm long and basically goes from #3 cylinder wall to #4 cylinder wall. It slowly lets coolant through, even without any pressure behind it. I am absolutely dumbfounded as to how this crack even formed, especially since it isn't along the cylinder as it usually is but rather a horizontal crack. Probably a few cm in length. Not sure on how to deal with this issue right now. Most likely, the only true fix is a new engine block, and even a relatively well done temporary fix requires at least a full engine teardown. Neither of those really fit my timetable right now, the car has been in my buddy's garage long enough as it is. I'm open to suggestions, but I'll be looking into ordering a new 05U block soon so I have one ready for the coming year, or whenever the current block inevitably fails fully. (Most likely once the crack reaches one of the frost plugs) I think it'd be a waste of money and time to rebuild the engine with this block. Oh and I found a rust hole on the side pocket of the trunk, which someone covered up with sealant goop, a piece of number plate and bodywork filler. Fun times. So far for every issue we fix we just find a new one that is arguably worse.
    • I have not found this no. I put one back on a couple days ago with no drama. I agree they are tight, but no need to remove anything. 
×
×
  • Create New...