Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what is considered too high of a comp ratio in a turbo motor

Depends what fuel is being used.

For 98 pump fuel in Australian climate anything over 9.4 is getting a bit exxy with decent boost pressure.

I bought Arias 9.4 forgies before cc'ing the 25 head which was a mistake coz the volume of the bowls were smaller than std brining the comp up to 9.6 :P

I've had to stuff around trying to source a thicker head gasket to bring it down to 9.2.

Tip of the week, get ur bowls in the head checked before you buy pistons. :down:

  • 2 weeks later...
we just got a new set of mahle 40 thou oversize forged pistons from hi octane. They look very schmick!

Will be the first set of pistons used in one of the many rb30 builds weve done that hasnt come from CP.

Judging by the specs on the piston box i imagine it will net a comp ratio of about 8.2:1, same as the flat tops CP provide for the conversion.

Have you had any headway with the Mahle's?

Cheers

Very good idea to put this thread up...1 question is, which is the better shape piston to use...dish top, flat top or crowned top pistons?

When I was building Cooper S engines 20 plus years ago I was lead to believe that dished tops were better because they captured the explosive combustion better not allowing as much blow force to spill over the outside diameter of the piston...(a bit like an upside down parachute) therefore producing more downward force on the piston creating more power...probably only marginally, but every bit helps. Also the shape of the dish helps keeps the piston more balanced and even under combustion load preventing less piston skirt wear on the bore. As I said, this is what I was lead to believe.

And Mahle pistons were the ducks nuts (the best) of pistons to be used...then.

Edited by The Ant

wisco's 8.5.1

Stock GTR Head gasket , stock head , cams and intake manifold

520hp on 20 PSI (street @ 8500rpm) , 637hp on 32psi C16 (race @ 9500rpm)

see for yourself. (I know its a VL not a skyline , but I also have a R32 GTR)

Behind a 2 speed power glide.

  • 4 weeks later...

ok i am looking around for piston options at the moment and thought i better keep piston info in the one thread instead of starting a new one again.

I am loooking for a fairly cheap option in forged pistons, firstly i was thinking cp pistons but havent got great confidence in there rings at all and have these in my other rb26 motor and rings are causing some minor blowby issues i dont like. Ive been told the rings have been updated but still abit uncertain.

other options are the Mahle pistons and ACL Race Series pistons.

does anyone have the part no. for the 2 brands of pistons above to suit a rb26/30 and what sort comp ratio do they work out too.

ACL Race Series

Ive found part no. 6MKRY9608 from the ACL race series website and they qoute 8.5:1 cr on rb30et engine so i assume its gonna work out too low using a rb26 head?

anyone with suitable part noumbers of pistons to suit rb26/30 engines and have a reasonably good cr ratio can u post them up.

Mahle Forged Pistons

Mahle i found a link on ebay qouting this info...

Part#: NIS264425I05

APPLICATION: NISSAN SKYLINE GTS-T RB30DET TURBO

RB30DET 87.00 Bore, 85.0mm, 152.5mm, 21mm Pin, 32.1mm, 4.5cc dish, 312g, 8.5:CR

does that info sound correct or do u think they are qouted for a rb30et instead?

anyone running Mahle pistons besides R33_Racer? any opinions on them?

Using either the RB25 or RB26 head on the RB30 block you need to use RB30E pistons the RB30ET pistons will result in a far too low compression ratio to be much use as a street car.

i realise that i was qouting the mahle website which said rb30det so i assume it might mean with a double overhead cam head setup, maybe it was a typing error from the ebay seller. The acl ones also had 2 versions for the rb30et, one being a 7.5:1 cr and the other a 8.5:1 cr.

Mahle Forged Pistons

Mahle i found a link on ebay qouting this info...

Part#: NIS264425I05

APPLICATION: NISSAN SKYLINE GTS-T RB30DET TURBO

RB30DET 87.00 Bore, 85.0mm, 152.5mm, 21mm Pin, 32.1mm, 4.5cc dish, 312g, 8.5:CR

does that info sound correct or do u think they are qouted for a rb30et instead?

anyone running Mahle pistons besides R33_Racer? any opinions on them?

Pistons with a 4.5cc dish sounds about right for 8.5 to 1 using a 62 cc combustion chamber. We run flat tops for 9.0 to 1.

Cheers

Gary

What is everyone using for a compression ratio calculator? Perhaps I am using the wrong formula?

I have been using the four stroke version on Wiseco's website.

http://www.wiseco.com/Calculators.aspx

Here are the specs on the Wiseco pistons I have.

3.046 inches (86.5mm)

1.260 inch (32mm) Comp Height

16cc dome

The RB26 head I have measures out at 64cc's. The head gasket being used is a Cometic MLS 87mm. Cometic rates the thickness at .051 inches (1.295mm). My block has been decked and the pistons sit at a zero deck.

When I plug these numbers,

Bore Diameter = 3.046

Engine Stroke = 3.346 (85mm)

Head Volume = 64cc

Gasket Bore Diameter = 3.425 (87mm)

Compressed Gasket Thickness = .051

Deck Clearance = 0

Piston Effective Dome Volume = 16cc

With these numbers I get a CR of 9.69:1

My plan is to shave nearly 11cc's off the piston dome to bring the dome volume to 5cc. According to the calculator this would give me CR of 8.490:1. I have to face the reality of 91 octane premium fuel in my part of the world.

  • 4 weeks later...

i am running Mahle pistons in my 26/30 hybrid. i think they are 8.5:1 - no idea on kw output from them yet, as during the run-in my turbos went pop and meant my rebuilt engine had to get re-rebuilt.

on the good side, the pistons were completely undamaged despite the bore getting damaged, so i can vouch for their construction.

on the bad side, new rings had to be ordered from the USA as there are none available here (apparently).

will post again once it has had a tune for power.

3.046 inchs = 77.3mm

86.5mm = 3.4 inchs

that could be a problem

What is everyone using for a compression ratio calculator? Perhaps I am using the wrong formula?

I have been using the four stroke version on Wiseco's website.

http://www.wiseco.com/Calculators.aspx

Here are the specs on the Wiseco pistons I have.

3.046 inches (86.5mm)

1.260 inch (32mm) Comp Height

16cc dome

The RB26 head I have measures out at 64cc's. The head gasket being used is a Cometic MLS 87mm. Cometic rates the thickness at .051 inches (1.295mm). My block has been decked and the pistons sit at a zero deck.

When I plug these numbers,

Bore Diameter = 3.046

Engine Stroke = 3.346 (85mm)

Head Volume = 64cc

Gasket Bore Diameter = 3.425 (87mm)

Compressed Gasket Thickness = .051

Deck Clearance = 0

Piston Effective Dome Volume = 16cc

With these numbers I get a CR of 9.69:1

My plan is to shave nearly 11cc's off the piston dome to bring the dome volume to 5cc. According to the calculator this would give me CR of 8.490:1. I have to face the reality of 91 octane premium fuel in my part of the world.

3.046 inchs = 77.3mm

86.5mm = 3.4 inchs

that could be a problem

Ops, I transposd that one in to the post wrong. It should be 3.406 for the bore diameter. Inputing that number would give a 8.174:1 CR.

Comp Ratio Calc For 4-Stroke Only

Bore Diameter 3.046 Inches

Engine Stroke 3.346 Inches

Head Volume 64.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Bore Diameter 3.425 Inches

Compressed Gasket Thickness 0.0510 Inches

Deck Clearance 0.0000 Inches

Piston Effective Dome Volume -16.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Volume 0.470

Deck Volume 0.000

TDC 3.399

Swept Volume 24.382

Compression Ratio 8.174 :1

Thanks for catching that error.

Not counting the typo in my copying, my numbers entered into the calculator still yeild the same 9.969:1

Comp Ratio Calc For 4-Stroke Only

Bore Diameter 3.406 Inches

Engine Stroke 3.346 Inches

Head Volume 64.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Bore Diameter 3.425 Inches

Compressed Gasket Thickness 0.0510 Inches

Deck Clearance 0.0000 Inches

Piston Effective Dome Volume -16.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Volume 0.470

Deck Volume 0.000

TDC 3.399

Swept Volume 30.485

Compression Ratio 9.969 :1

I am still not understanding how it is possible to get around a 9:1 CR with flat top pistons.

Changing the Piston Effective Dome Volume to 0 will yield a 7.968:1 CR according to the calculator.

Comp Ratio Calc For 4-Stroke Only

Bore Diameter 3.406 Inches

Engine Stroke 3.346 Inches

Head Volume 64.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Bore Diameter 3.425 Inches

Compressed Gasket Thickness 0.0510 Inches

Deck Clearance 0.0000 Inches

Piston Effective Dome Volume 0.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Volume 0.470

Deck Volume 0.000

TDC 4.375

Swept Volume 30.485

Compression Ratio 7.968 :1

What am I missing here?

Edited by Stealth-Z

A flat top piston with a 1mm ( compressed head gasket - as in a std OEM ) will achieve 8.1:1 - 8.2:1 with your combustion chamber size. As does the CP flat top piston.

To achieve around 9.0:1 you will have to have an around 6 to 7cc dome on your piston.

Ops, I transposd that one in to the post wrong. It should be 3.406 for the bore diameter. Inputing that number would give a 8.174:1 CR.

Comp Ratio Calc For 4-Stroke Only

Bore Diameter 3.046 Inches

Engine Stroke 3.346 Inches

Head Volume 64.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Bore Diameter 3.425 Inches

Compressed Gasket Thickness 0.0510 Inches

Deck Clearance 0.0000 Inches

Piston Effective Dome Volume -16.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Volume 0.470

Deck Volume 0.000

TDC 3.399

Swept Volume 24.382

Compression Ratio 8.174 :1

Thanks for catching that error.

Not counting the typo in my copying, my numbers entered into the calculator still yeild the same 9.969:1

Comp Ratio Calc For 4-Stroke Only

Bore Diameter 3.406 Inches

Engine Stroke 3.346 Inches

Head Volume 64.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Bore Diameter 3.425 Inches

Compressed Gasket Thickness 0.0510 Inches

Deck Clearance 0.0000 Inches

Piston Effective Dome Volume -16.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Volume 0.470

Deck Volume 0.000

TDC 3.399

Swept Volume 30.485

Compression Ratio 9.969 :1

I am still not understanding how it is possible to get around a 9:1 CR with flat top pistons.

Changing the Piston Effective Dome Volume to 0 will yield a 7.968:1 CR according to the calculator.

Comp Ratio Calc For 4-Stroke Only

Bore Diameter 3.406 Inches

Engine Stroke 3.346 Inches

Head Volume 64.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Bore Diameter 3.425 Inches

Compressed Gasket Thickness 0.0510 Inches

Deck Clearance 0.0000 Inches

Piston Effective Dome Volume 0.00 Cubic cm's

Gasket Volume 0.470

Deck Volume 0.000

TDC 4.375

Swept Volume 30.485

Compression Ratio 7.968 :1

What am I missing here?

when we get a motor that holds together long enough to inspect after a season of racing ill let you know how the mahles look....but after the last quick blow up with them in it, they seem like brand new, considering the amount of bearing material that was being rammed up its clacker!

is anyone on here actually measuring the static compression of their motor or just using a calculator or what the specs say you should get?

Mine has been apart for some time now. I have measured the parameters for the compression calculators. My first set of custom Wiseco pistons were flat tops with -5cc valve relief cuts. They were suposed to produce a CR of around 9:1. After measuring, the CR came out to less than 7.

PistonsRodsBearings2.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...
Pistons with a 4.5cc dish sounds about right for 8.5 to 1 using a 62 cc combustion chamber. We run flat tops for 9.0 to 1.

Cheers

Gary

If your pistons are flat top then that means no dome/dish correct? Using the engine compression ratio calculator I'm having to enter values of -1mm deck clearance (piston sitting 1mm above deck at TDC) to get comp ratios of 9:1.

Does that sound right to you?

Is there a preferred choice in pistons in regards to dome versus compression height?

flat tops with higher compression height or domed pistons with lower compression height.

I've been looking at other possible sources of pistons, the SR20, 3SGTE, 1J and 2J series engines also share 86mm bore. Is it just a matter of finding something with the same wrist pin diameter? Or can that be overcome with use of different bearings?

I'm aiming for somewhere between 250 and 300rwkw, which I think forged pistons are overkill. I'd use the factory RB30 pistons but I want higher compression ratios. Would it be simpler to just deck the block and/or shave the head to remove approx 1mm?

Also, ceramic coating the pistons/combustion chambers, is that going to affect the combustion chamber volume or is the amount of change negligible?

[/so many questions]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...