Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys, VG30DETT rods are 2mm longer than the RB30 rods. And the RB25DET pistons have the shorter compression height, if I use both of these should give the correct height depending on combustion chamber volumes.

Does this sound like a viable option?

Probably firstly depends on the crank journal sizes - how much difference is there between the VG and RB rods? You'd need things side by side to measure up, and maybe look at a dummy assembly if you can get the bits at low cost.

Alternatively, why not look at just using RB25 pistons and deck the block by the required amount? Sure you might be retaining cast pistons and stock RB30 rods, but gets the result you want.

There should be a number of viable ways to achieve a similar outcome. It takes $$ to put in the parts that make for a stout 30DET, but the lower spec pistons and rods would still make for a good street build IMO.

Given the options, I'd rather install a longer rod (from an engine that was factory turbo) opposed to decking the block to compensate for the lower height pistons. Also, I'm aiming to get a comp ratio approx 9:1 so I think there would be a fair bit of block decking to reach that with just the 25DET pistons, apparently the galleries start widening once you take off 2mm off the block.

From what I've read the VG30 rods fit in the RB30 block/crank, might need to organise something different for the gudeon pins/bearings depending on the piston used.

But this all depends on combustion chamber volume, if the block and/or head need shaving to ensure it's true, from the rough calcs I did, the VG30 rods and RB25 pistons could result in compression ratios over 10:1, in which case I may need to use RB26 pistons (lower compression height again). Also, another thing I need to factor is if the block is worn and needs boring out I'll need overbore pistons, which may prove difficult to find 2nd hand.

Basically, I see it the similar as using factory RB30 rods and pistons, instead the rod happens to be longer and the piston a bit shorter. The parts are going to be balanced and new bearings etc installed either way and the VG30/RB25 parts can be obtained relatively easily and cheap.

Just want to know if it's stupid idea in theory.

Edited by daisu
7. SPOOL RB30 conrods and CP Forged Pistons $2050
Direct from their page

As opposed to picking up a set of VG30 rods/pistons for about $100 and haven't looked at RB25 piston prices but I'm assuming they would be similar priced.

Considering alot of people are making good power figures using standard bottom ends in both RB30's, VG30's, and RB25's I don't see the need to upgrade to aftermarket pistons/rods.

Direct from their page

As opposed to picking up a set of VG30 rods/pistons for about $100 and haven't looked at RB25 piston prices but I'm assuming they would be similar priced.

Considering alot of people are making good power figures using standard bottom ends in both RB30's, VG30's, and RB25's I don't see the need to upgrade to aftermarket pistons/rods.

I can tell you for a fact that vg30 rods fit. thats what im using. However i got custom JE pistons made to suit and eagle rods. VG30 rods are 154mm (6.070in) and rb30 are 6in or 152.5mm thereabouts. so vg30 are 2.5mm longer, i havnt bothered trying to find out if they work with std. pistons etc. VG30 DOHC rods from 300zx etc have a 22mm rod bush, SOHC use a 21mm rod bush, same as all RB engines, so to start with youd need SOHC 300zx rods from something like a maxima. both VG rods use the same bottom end as RB so use the same bearings, even the acl website use the same partnumber

vg30 rods are about 1.5mm to 2mm thinner across the rod ( thickness ) than RB30 rods - so when using VG30 rods you end up with a rod that slides back and fourth on the big end journal.

I can tell you for a fact that vg30 rods fit. thats what im using. However i got custom JE pistons made to suit and eagle rods. VG30 rods are 154mm (6.070in) and rb30 are 6in or 152.5mm thereabouts. so vg30 are 2.5mm longer, i havnt bothered trying to find out if they work with std. pistons etc. VG30 DOHC rods from 300zx etc have a 22mm rod bush, SOHC use a 21mm rod bush, same as all RB engines, so to start with youd need SOHC 300zx rods from something like a maxima. both VG rods use the same bottom end as RB so use the same bearings, even the acl website use the same partnumber
I can tell you for a fact that vg30 rods fit. thats what im using. However i got custom JE pistons made to suit and eagle rods. VG30 rods are 154mm (6.070in) and rb30 are 6in or 152.5mm thereabouts. so vg30 are 2.5mm longer, i havnt bothered trying to find out if they work with std. pistons etc. VG30 DOHC rods from 300zx etc have a 22mm rod bush, SOHC use a 21mm rod bush, same as all RB engines, so to start with youd need SOHC 300zx rods from something like a maxima. both VG rods use the same bottom end as RB so use the same bearings, even the acl website use the same partnumber

Ah yes, I saw those pistons you had for sale on trademe.nz, question for you, with the pistons you had and using the VG30 rods you said it would give approx 8.3:1 compression ratio. Can I ask what was the compression height of the piston and whether how many CC's if it was dome top or dished?

If the VG30E(T) rods have the correct bush size then this would be easier than machining pistons to suit 22mm pin or having bushes made to suit 21mm pin. Only problem is knowing how strong/reliable they are. The factory power output of the engine is very similar to the ratings of the RB30. We'll see if I can find some people pushing decent power through these engines on standard bottom ends.

K577M87 - NISSAN RB30 GTR DISH 6577M87 - $852.12 That's US dollars without shipping.

And I'm not making anywhere near 530kW. I really don't see the need to use aftermarket pistons in my application.

The rods being thinner could be a problem though.

K577M87 Wiseco Pistons Rb30 GTR, Used by UK owners and proven to work

$648.84 USD from No limit motorsport be around $120 usd ship

$770 USD delivered + Spool rods $750 AUD= saves u around $500?

since they sell CP pistons + rods for 2k

vg30 rods are about 1.5mm to 2mm thinner across the rod ( thickness ) than RB30 rods - so when using VG30 rods you end up with a rod that slides back and fourth on the big end journal.

'Spoolup', do you know how this issue is overcome on the VG30 engines by any chance?

yes that is exactly corret - on the VG30 there are two rods per journal ( being a V6 ).

So the width of the journal is just different to the RB30 and that is why the VG30 is different

i dont no for sure but i would presume that the crank is just sized/designed differently to accomodate the thinner rod.

for your power - just run a set of std RB30 rods and NA RB30 pistons - they will handle it and obviously a direct fit with no issues.

$1500 is still much more than I want to pay when standard items have been proven more than capable in the power range I'm aiming for.
Edited by Spoolup

this may be a stupid question for sum, but do you get your block work done and then purchase your pistons and bearings so forth or do you just get over sized pistons and then got the block done to match. or does it not really matter what way you do it

Yeah, I was contemplating just using standard rod/pistons, but as said before I want higher comp.

I guess I should start by CC'ing the head and having the block checked first. No point in figuring out I can use X pistons only to find out the block needs to be bored out and the pistons won't fit anymore.

I'll just have to go with decked block/shaved head and thin head gasket.

I would assume you'd have the block inspected first and then decide if oversize pistons are needed. Or if you had already planned on oversize pistons I guess it wouldn't matter which way you did it.

Clarification please?

Edited by daisu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
    • Given what I know now - same haha, but this was 12 years ago with second hand 740cc Nismo injectors in my S15 daily, I was too busy hunting elsewhere for the issue to even look at the injectors, running through some cleaner was a happy coincidence haha
    • Not a terrible idea. But if I ever had concerns that my injectors were sufficiently dirty to be causing me a problem, they would be out of the engine and onto the actual injector cleaner/testing bench.
×
×
  • Create New...