Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 years later...

LOL well that only has one control wire from the ECU, so why not bypass your problem without trying to trace it back ;)

At the end of the day running a new wire to it will tell you if the problem is in the wiring or not, however I would be dubious to expect otherwise after you stated it came up after the manual conversion.

GL

Correct...green/orange

Did try it ungrounded as well....no go

The thing is its a conversion into a laurel as well so the wiring might not be 100% accurate, but AFAIK the neutral switch is the only thing that works along with the nvcs as the R33gtst has to be in a gear other than neutral for it to work.....on top of the fact that, it was an automatic now converted to manual and using a manual ecu

How does a neutral switch work on a manual box?

Its closed when the gear is in the neutral position right?....one side of the switch goes to the "neutral sw" pin 44 on the ecu an the next side of the switch goes where?

basically is a function is just a pre-written bit of code that results in certain action each time you run it. The most commmon being something "Hello world"

function hWorld()

{

'output to screen command depending on language' "Hello World";

}

So when you run the function, hWorld(), it will output on the screen 'Hello World'.

so....i think it kinda means..

whilst the function sensor(TPS) is outputing a value greater than .40, AND the function switch(NTR) is NOT equal to something/not true? and function int(RPM) is less than <1500 rpm, run the function NVCS, passing int the parametre of 1

i think...

so it's a loop, it will keep running NVCS whilst all those other conditions are met, not sure if that helps at all (and i may have got some of that wrong as well :D).

One side of the sw goes to pin 44 on the ecu and I believe the other side of the neutral sw goes to ground

So grounding pin 44 directly simulates the car is in neutral (sw on) and floating it simulates its in a gear (sw off)

I tried both ways and all other condition are good sooooo.........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...