Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 years later...

LOL well that only has one control wire from the ECU, so why not bypass your problem without trying to trace it back ;)

At the end of the day running a new wire to it will tell you if the problem is in the wiring or not, however I would be dubious to expect otherwise after you stated it came up after the manual conversion.

GL

Correct...green/orange

Did try it ungrounded as well....no go

The thing is its a conversion into a laurel as well so the wiring might not be 100% accurate, but AFAIK the neutral switch is the only thing that works along with the nvcs as the R33gtst has to be in a gear other than neutral for it to work.....on top of the fact that, it was an automatic now converted to manual and using a manual ecu

How does a neutral switch work on a manual box?

Its closed when the gear is in the neutral position right?....one side of the switch goes to the "neutral sw" pin 44 on the ecu an the next side of the switch goes where?

basically is a function is just a pre-written bit of code that results in certain action each time you run it. The most commmon being something "Hello world"

function hWorld()

{

'output to screen command depending on language' "Hello World";

}

So when you run the function, hWorld(), it will output on the screen 'Hello World'.

so....i think it kinda means..

whilst the function sensor(TPS) is outputing a value greater than .40, AND the function switch(NTR) is NOT equal to something/not true? and function int(RPM) is less than <1500 rpm, run the function NVCS, passing int the parametre of 1

i think...

so it's a loop, it will keep running NVCS whilst all those other conditions are met, not sure if that helps at all (and i may have got some of that wrong as well :D).

One side of the sw goes to pin 44 on the ecu and I believe the other side of the neutral sw goes to ground

So grounding pin 44 directly simulates the car is in neutral (sw on) and floating it simulates its in a gear (sw off)

I tried both ways and all other condition are good sooooo.........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...