Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

I've got an R34 GTR VSpec II and am about to do some mods to her.

R34 N1's

700cc Injectors

Walbro Pump

Apexi PFC

HKS Intake

Exhaust w/ High Flow cat

I have Z32 AFM's also which im trying to decide whether to fit or to sell, for the power those mods will produce (Hoping like 350 - 400rwhp) will i need Z32's? If not what kind of power will i need to be making to justify them?

Also, as far as the mods go, is there anything i have overlooked that will add easy power to the car that i should be considering? (Been told not to look at Cams or anything as the R34 GTR's don't really need them for that power, but i don't know how true this is)

Thanks guys!

Do the R34 GTR's come with N1's as standard?

Thinking about buys a 34 GTR ;)

No. Normal R34GTR turbos are ball bearing with ceramic tubines. The N1's have ball bearings and steel turbines, look very much like GT2530's and are capable of around the same power.

Cheers

Gary

I would stick with what you have at the moment and see what afm voltages you get...if they are not close to going full scale I would leave them.

The reason for this is if you went for z32s and they were only measuring upto say 30-40% of full measurement scale or voltage, you are not using the full input resolution of the ECU and technically you are losing precision in your tune..The ECU uses an A-D converter to convert voltage into a digital number. Not analogue. So voltages are either rounded up or down to the nearest value. If the ECU has an input range of 0-5v and you are only using 2v of that range then between each corresponding digital value would be higher and the resulting error would be higher..

An analogy to this,

If wanted to measure the length of something that was 87mm in length and you had either:

1. A 1 metre ruler with 1cm divisions

or

2. A shorter ruler say 300mm long divided into 1mm increments

The best option would be option 2 for measuring the 87mm. The 1m ruler would see it as (9cm) 90mm and not 87mm

Hope this makes sense..

Oooops, sorry, mis-read it... HP..! i got 303.1Kw at wheels similar plus internals and flowed head, flashy filters etc, plus FPR plus good boost controller plus more too.

N1's are superb Road 'bines tho, stick with them. there are a few variants as well i am told too!!, but i unclear what the variants are.

Good luck, enjoy the results, its a good start u got going there.

My orig's maxed out at just short of 300RWKW. btw.

R34's have smaller turbo potential than orig GTR ones too. Get some Orig GTR32's, more power from them, but still ceramic exh impeller am afraid , but better turbos than R34's

Edited by Richieb
I would stick with what you have at the moment and see what afm voltages you get...if they are not close to going full scale I would leave them.

The reason for this is if you went for z32s and they were only measuring upto say 30-40% of full measurement scale or voltage, you are not using the full input resolution of the ECU and technically you are losing precision in your tune..The ECU uses an A-D converter to convert voltage into a digital number. Not analogue. So voltages are either rounded up or down to the nearest value. If the ECU has an input range of 0-5v and you are only using 2v of that range then between each corresponding digital value would be higher and the resulting error would be higher..

An analogy to this,

If wanted to measure the length of something that was 87mm in length and you had either:

1. A 1 metre ruler with 1cm divisions

or

2. A shorter ruler say 300mm long divided into 1mm increments

The best option would be option 2 for measuring the 87mm. The 1m ruler would see it as (9cm) 90mm and not 87mm

Hope this makes sense..

Thanks a lot mate that does make sense (as an engineering student your analogy was right on the money to what i've been taught lol)

Thanks everyone else for your input also, ill leave the stockers and see how they fare and swap them out if necessary! Thanks!

My orig's maxed out at just short of 300RWKW. btw.

R34's have smaller turbo potential than orig GTR ones too. Get some Orig GTR32's, more power from them, but still ceramic exh impeller am afraid , but better turbos than R34's

sorry to hijac but...

Is this correct? Thought the standard 34 gtr turbos would flow more than the stocka 32's?

mike

sorry to hijac but...

Is this correct? Thought the standard 34 gtr turbos would flow more than the stocka 32's?

mike

No standard 34 turbos are slightlty bigger than 32+33 and better because they are ball bearing but still have ceramic turbine wheels .

R32 - 0.42a/r compressor

R33 - 0.42a/r compressor

R34 - 0.53a/r compressor

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tbroom/Turbos.htm

very useful for comparing stock turbochargers, lists all specs, wheels, trims, housing etc

Got that one paul, but the opinion here is stiil the best ones are the R32's.

R34 spool up quicker, but run out of steam. The Compressor wheel is smaller.

Edited by Richieb
I would stick with what you have at the moment and see what afm voltages you get...if they are not close to going full scale I would leave them.

The reason for this is if you went for z32s and they were only measuring upto say 30-40% of full measurement scale or voltage, you are not using the full input resolution of the ECU and technically you are losing precision in your tune..The ECU uses an A-D converter to convert voltage into a digital number. Not analogue. So voltages are either rounded up or down to the nearest value. If the ECU has an input range of 0-5v and you are only using 2v of that range then between each corresponding digital value would be higher and the resulting error would be higher..

An analogy to this,

If wanted to measure the length of something that was 87mm in length and you had either:

1. A 1 metre ruler with 1cm divisions

or

2. A shorter ruler say 300mm long divided into 1mm increments

The best option would be option 2 for measuring the 87mm. The 1m ruler would see it as (9cm) 90mm and not 87mm

Hope this makes sense..

+1 :spank:

What topic was being discussed?

OH..AFM's....... :laughing-smiley-014:

RB20 or RB25 just plug in ...that is what I have gone with.

But if you got $$$...Nismo all the way..at least you have bragging rights...... :banana:

ive still got my stock afms... made 287.8kw @ all 4's... that was on 15psi.. after that i ran tad over 17psi which is slightly over 300kw @ all 4's and afrs were still good...

they look like stock afms anyways.. as were injectors and fuel pump lol.. the stock GTR gear is pretty serious stuff really

hmm sell the z32 afm's. sell your standard ones. use extra money for a haltec or my personal favorite (short of 10g plus motec) the new wolf v500.

just buy something that uses a map sensor and be done with it

MAP sensor and multiple throttle bodies are not a good mix for a road car.

Cheers

Gaery

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So I mentioned the apprentice, @LachyK helped take the bonnet off. We just undid the nuts on the hinges and unclipped the gas struts, then pulled the bonnet back a little as the front was catching on the front bar.  I had a good look at everything today and have removed the rams, repaired/reset the hinges and bolted it back together like it never happened. I'll do a separate write up on the repair, and I also removed the poppers from the Fuga today too to save grief down the road.....as said above it is at least $5k to repair retail. I'm also happier about my ability to prepare a race car, and less happy about Nis-nault's engineering (I can hear @GTSBoy sAfrican Americaning) because the top hose of the radiator didn't slip off.......it snapped clean off. By practice I put the hose clamp hard up against the flare on a neck to make it least likely to ever move (thanks @Neil!). I guess that puts a little more pressure on the end of the pipe as it is further away from the rad, but still, that is pretty shit. I've put it back on for now as there was a fair bit of neck still there, but obviously there is no lip on the neck any more so I don't think I'll track it again until I have a new rad. Speaking of which....more research required. It looks like Koyo makes a standard size radiator in ally which I'll grab in the meantime, but I really want something thicker so might have to go custom in the medium term (ouch) Coolant still needs a refill and I have the pressure tester on it over night, but other than a wash down of the engine bay it seems alright. And @MBS206 noted something noisy on the front of the engine and I think I agree....time for a new accessory belt and tensioners I think.
    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
    • The BES920 is like the Toyota Camrys of coffee machines. E61 group head is cool, however the time requirements for home use makes it less desirable. The Toyota Camry coffee machine runs twin boilers and also PID temp control, some say it produces coffees as good as an E61 group head machine.
×
×
  • Create New...