Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently I performed some intake temperature tests. They are not dead acurate but are atleast an indication of when heat soak is affecting your engine. I used some digital thremometers from jaycar for the tests.

The car: 1993 R33 GTSt, 3" turbo back exhaust, 8psi (stock) boost, stock intercooler, pod filter with cold air partition (95deg neoprene heat shield).

Ambient temperature: 17degC

1st Test: Cruising at 110km/h

Pod = 15deg

AFM = 15deg

Engine Bay = 35deg

2nd Test: Stuck in traffic (45km/h max.) (heat soak had set in)

Pod = 35deg

AFM = 37deg

Engine Bay = 55deg

3rd Test: On boost hill climb and high speeds

Pod = 14deg

AFM = 12deg

Engine Bay = 33deg

4th Test: Heat Soak

After pulling up at a set of lights from cruising at 110km/h, it took 3 minutes to reach full heat soak as shown in the 2nd test. It took 7 minutes of driving at 110km/h again to fully get rid of it.....

5th Test: After idle for 3 mins

Pod = 40deg

AFM = 43deg

Engine Bay = 60deg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21359-r33-gtst-intake-temperature-tests/
Share on other sites

pod filter with cold air partition (95deg neoprene heat shield).

rb25 - do u have a cold air intake?? e.g. a tube rigged from somewhere front of your car to feed your partition steady supply of cold air? Of course, not much use at idle.

*Very* interesting results, about time somebody got scientific on this :P

Those that take their skyline to the strip should take note. Obviously sitting there idling as you wait to get your run (can be 20mins), gradually moving forward - its just like traffic unfortunately. Even if u regularly turn your engine on and off heat soak is going to set in and its going to effect your times.

A suggestion: Can u at all do plenum temperatures? Obviously you've got some good before intake results, but the most important thing is the actual temps going into your engine..

Interesting results...

Now all u need to do is *borrow* someones carbon fibre bonnet with the vents in it and see how much of a difference it makes (obviously weather and traffic conditions would be hard to keep accurate).

Interesting. The people driving around with pod filters but without partitions should take note of the air temps they are sucking in.

What thermometer model did you use?

I tried to buy thermometers from Jaycar 2 weeks ago to perform similar testing with my own partition (http://www.endusk.com/skyline/caip/caip.html) but the dumbasses couldn't find where in the shop they put them.....

When I get some I will add some notes on the temp differences between using just neoprene and using aluminium + neoprene stuff + sealing rubbers.

I forgot to mention that without a duct forcing air into the partitioned area the heatsoak reduced at 60km/h and above, even in traffic.

predator666: I dont have a duct rigged up to it at the moment. I will do some plenum temps very soon (end of this week/early next week)

Sil8ty: I got the heatshield from Century Foam and Rubber. It's about 8mm thick, sort of like neoprene and has a reflective foil on one side. My partition cost 2 hours of time and 4 dollars.

kjb_r33: I've been informed that the clutch fan on the engine from the factory is excellent in its efficiency and i think that at high engine speeds it pulls alot more fresh air int the engine bay thus making it cooler.

sewid: boxhead has a similar partition (made from metal) and it gets red hot. Metal partitions in my opinion suffer from heat soak and would lengthen the times to get the intake temps down.

I've posted a pic of my setup below. I know its rough, but it seals to the bonnet and the top of the wheel arch and right up to the back of the headlight and it works really well.

Originally posted by rb25

sewid: boxhead has a similar partition (made from metal) and it gets red hot. Metal partitions in my opinion suffer from heat soak and would lengthen the times to get the intake temps down.

I have thought about that as well. Now the aluminium is insulated with foam it gets warm but never hot/red hot/too hot to touch.

To solve the problem of getting the heat out of the aluminium i was thinking of thermal epoxying on some aluminium heatsinks on the cold side.

I dont know if this would worsen the problem of heatsoak however in the long term or increase the effective heatsoak time to beyond average lenght of time spent stopped thereby negating it.... Only way to find out is to experiment.

Or could just remove the headlight and poke the pod out the front :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...