Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm at the point where I have enough money to get some coilovers for the GTR in preparation for superlap now.

What do you guys run in terms of Spring Rates on your GTRs? I'm asking in here and not the suspension area because I'm not really concerned about street handling as such and don't feel like being recommended "Super Streets".

My two main choices at the moment are Greddy Type S coilovers or Cusco Zero 2's. Both are about the same cost ($1700), both are height and damper adjustable but they come with fixed spring rates.

The Greddy Type S's run 8kg front, 6kg rear but are a "progressive spring", whereas the Cusco's are 12kg front, 10kg rear.

Assuming I want it setup with track, not street in mind, am I better to go with the stiffer option?

Thanks,

Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/213828-track-going-gtrs/
Share on other sites

What sort of tyres will you be using?

Im assuming some kind of semi given you are competing in super lap?

I think (don't quote me on this) that you can typically run spring rates a little higher when running on a semi as opposed to a street tyre (and likewise a bit stiffer again with a full slick)

RT615s are the plan at the moment!

6 point cage, full SK kit bar coilovers.

Thanks for the help, I am leaning towards the stiffer setup at the moment, as I think running at stock weight the 8 fronts 6 rears will be a bit too soft.

Bilsteins or Ohlins are out of the question money wise!

RT615s are the plan at the moment!

Thanks for the help, I am leaning towards the stiffer setup at the moment, as I think running at stock weight the 8 fronts 6 rears will be a bit too soft.

Ok a few things:

1. Using RT615's is like trying to get a bit pregnant. Either buy some proper R compounds or don't. Re55's are the most popular on GT-R's due to their grip & pricing in the appropriate sizes.

2. Don't forget to include sway bars & a camber/castor fit in amongst the springs.

3. 8/6 is more than stiff enough. 12/10 is plain silly.

You will notice that all real high performing japanese suspension use rather high spring rates due to a number of reasons:

1. their tracks are perfectly smooth

2. they dont touch the ripple strips

3. the mega high performing cars dont use anti roll bars they purely run of spring rates.

On our tracks 12/10 would be almost to stiff i think. How much are you looking to spend? Only around the $2000 mark?

Edited by Hi Octane Racing
3. 8/6 is more than stiff enough. 12/10 is plain silly.

Really? What are you basing this on?

I know some of the spring rates that some of the racing GTRs (without naming any of the race teams) that we all know and love, and they are running MUCH stiffer than 8/6. Much much much stiffer.

I'm no suspension guru (as far from it as possible), but I have a feeling that it really depends on the quality of the shock absorber, and its ability to handle the rebound stroke of the stiffer spring rates? I've been for a ride in some GTRs with RIDICULOUS spring rates, and they felt perfectly fine, even over corrugated iron tarmac. On the other hand, I have also been in some GTRs running slighty softer spring rates on a popular green japanese coilover brand that was rough as guts.

Again, if any REAL suspension gurus wish to tell me I'm full of sh1t, please feel free :rofl:

Really? What are you basing this on?

I know some of the spring rates that some of the racing GTRs (without naming any of the race teams) that we all know and love, and they are running MUCH stiffer than 8/6. Much much much stiffer.

I'm no suspension guru (as far from it as possible), but I have a feeling that it really depends on the quality of the shock absorber, and its ability to handle the rebound stroke of the stiffer spring rates? I've been for a ride in some GTRs with RIDICULOUS spring rates, and they felt perfectly fine, even over corrugated iron tarmac. On the other hand, I have also been in some GTRs running slighty softer spring rates on a popular green japanese coilover brand that was rough as guts.

Again, if any REAL suspension gurus wish to tell me I'm full of sh1t, please feel free :rofl:

I am basing it on the spring rates I run in my GT-R.

Some people prefer harder spings, some softer. It depends on what track you run on also. As an example Phillip Island would be different to say Winton.

Edited by djr81
You will notice that all real high performing japanese suspension use rather high spring rates due to a number of reasons:

1. their tracks are perfectly smooth

2. they dont touch the ripple strips

3. the mega high performing cars dont use anti roll bars they purely run of spring rates.

On our tracks 12/10 would be almost to stiff i think. How much are you looking to spend? Only around the $2000 mark?

That's the maximum yes, this is a very low budget car compared to a lot of what's running.

But what you run in YOUR GTR is by no means an indication of what's best for a track-only GTR....... Is it? :rofl:

Um, well I never claimed to be the font of all knowledge on the subject.

Just that the bloke asked what people were running.

So I thought I would share.

I'm sorry if I confused my opinion with one that had some validity. :blink:

But I have gone throught the exercise of setting my GT-R up to work on a track on R compounds.

Edited by djr81
Um, well I never claimed to be the font of all knowledge on the subject.

Just that the bloke asked what people were running.

So I thought I would share.

I'm sorry if I confused my opinion with one that had some validity. :rofl:

Oh okay...

I wasn't having a go at you, I was genuinely interested, because I have heard SOOOOO many different ideas on what the ideal spring rates are.

It's hard to differentiate between personal "normal-person's", "tried one coilover and it seems to be good" opinion and informed, race-experience, "tried-all the different spring rates"-based opinion.

Suspension will make or break a track car, so along with the thread starter, I want to make sure I get all the right information :blink:

Oh okay...

I wasn't having a go at you, I was genuinely interested, because I have heard SOOOOO many different ideas on what the ideal spring rates are.

It's hard to differentiate between personal "normal-persons" opinion and informed, race-experience, "tried-all the different spring rates"-based opinion.

Suspension will make or break a track car, so along with the thread starter, I want to make sure I get all the right information :rofl:

That my point exactly, and the reason I'm asking, there are good points backing both, hence why I'm looking to see what others run :blink:

I've already got the rest of the gear, camber, castor, cage, sway bars, bushings, subframe alignment kit. I just want to make sure I finish the package properly.

That's the maximum yes, this is a very low budget car compared to a lot of what's running.

For your application and as the car is only circuit use I would go the Cusco's. The spring rates may be high however they are adjustable so you will be able to soften it slightly if they are to stiff. For the money they would be the option of choice in my opinion. Otherwise keep saving till you reach $3900 for the Bilstein height & rate adjustable ones :rofl:

Ok a few things:

1. Using RT615's is like trying to get a bit pregnant. Either buy some proper R compounds or don't. Re55's are the most popular on GT-R's due to their grip & pricing in the appropriate sizes.

2. Don't forget to include sway bars & a camber/castor fit in amongst the springs.

3. 8/6 is more than stiff enough. 12/10 is plain silly.

Unfort for the clubman class for superlap, the RT615's are Matt's only option (or the 595RS's?)

Unfort for the clubman class for superlap, the RT615's are Matt's only option (or the 595RS's?)

Shame that.

Anyway the general trend is the more tyre grip you have the higher the spring & sway bar rates you need to run.

So if you are stuck being half pregnant IMHO that is more reason to run the lower rate spring.

Unfort for the clubman class for superlap, the RT615's are Matt's only option (or the 595RS's?)

Agreed, the rules chose the tyres :rofl:

That being said though 12month old RT215s are the best tyres I've ever had on any of my cars so I don't know what I'm missing out on.

Agreed, the rules chose the tyres :blink:

That being said though 12month old RT215s are the best tyres I've ever had on any of my cars so I don't know what I'm missing out on.

:rofl:

Don't EVER try proper semi-slicks. Your wallet will hate you forever.

Drop SK a PM he will give you the ins and outs.

Note though doing it properly is going to hurt the wallet.

I have gone as per djr81 with a bilstein coilover arrangement but for a 33 (not 32) with different shock valving and 5 front 4 rear Eibach springs. Desired handling is slightly more towards allrounder (road on street rubber and track on semis) but more F caster and more F and R camber than for a typical road set up.

Only just gone in but initial impressions are positive. drj81 has been progressively updating his for quite a while (how's the transfer case Richard??)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...