Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just installed my new RACE TRACK spec D2 coilovers on my nissan gts r33 98 model (only drive it on track days), took it down to the track and the car literally sticks to the ground, huge improvement for a reasonable price.

I found that the harder I adjusted the damping the more stable it got on corners. The Maserati behind me was all over the track going off the chicanes it was a laugh. But my car cuts off so given up after a few laps.

Rear: 3.0 turns from hard

Front: 2.5 turns from hard.

Will try harder settings next time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214339-d2-suspension/
Share on other sites

Just installed my new RACE TRACK spec D2 coilovers on my nissan gts r33 98 model (only drive it on track days), took it down to the track and the car literally sticks to the ground, huge improvement for a reasonable price.

I found that the harder I adjusted the damping the more stable it got on corners. The Maserati behind me was all over the track going off the chicanes it was a laugh. But my car cuts off so given up after a few laps.

Rear: 3.0 turns from hard

Front: 2.5 turns from hard.

Will try harder settings next time.

Where is your local track. What other mods do you have and what tyres were you running? I only ask as i find peoples opinions on suspension vary greatly, so to me the real indicator of good suspension is the pace it can be hurried around a track. I drove a guys neat R32 GTSt at Eastern Creek a few years back. Had more power then my car, no speed limiter and about the same tyres. I have better brakes...and i was able to circulate almost two seconds quicker in my car then his....he jumped from mine wanting my suspension as whilst his was way firmner mine gripped a lot longer.

So what feels tight and grippy may not really give good traction, even though it may be to the owners liking or what he feels handles good. LOL hanflign does not equal traction :down:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214339-d2-suspension/#findComment-3785857
Share on other sites

ok well 1st off what were u running b4? of course it is gunna feel like the bomb if u've just been rollin round on stock suspension

again what tires, if there not the same as u ran on ur previous setup then u may need to factor that in

how did u change the geometry of the car (camber/toe/castor) also as its been mentioned dropping the car 100mm is gunna help feel and performance

also be carefull comparing to other cars on the track cause driver skill come into it ALOT more than the car, i've beaten 400hp GTR's around a track in my old car with 150hp and busted ass JIC's

also u list ur prefered settings for stiffness and say that u wanna try stiffer, were u being timed? and did u compare times to setting to find the optimum?

i dont doubt that ur car does indeed go better with these coilovers than ur std suspension... however these cheap coilovers D2's G4's and ISC's simply do not have the R&D put into them that they need. they use overly stiff valving and spring rates to make it 'feel' faster and more fun to drive, but infact if you push it to the limits they simply cant provide the grip that a quailty product can. i have custom bilstine coilovers all round on my car (track only) and i love them, they're softer than my previous jap spec coilovers but provide much better grip through both the tight twisty stuff and the long sweeping bends; admitadly it is too soft for drifting and as thats the direction that i wish to take the car they will have to be rebuilt to new specs, a costly and time consuming exercise, but necessary if u truly wish ur car to handle

basically what i'm saying is they're good, an improvement over std, but there is alot better out there and personally i wouldnt touch them (quality products will also last longer)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214339-d2-suspension/#findComment-3785999
Share on other sites

well gentlemen, let's not overcomplicate things.

R31_pwr how do u know that D2s don't have R&D put into them? :D

comeone fellas, we all know who the big players are and many people fall into the trap of paying the extra 1,000 bucks. there are people that bash teins, ohlins etc..I know a guy who suggested buying USD 20,000 suspension saying they were the best. By the way D2s are not cheap, I think they are reasonably priced rather haha..let's not get corporate...but anyway who knows I probably will try the others as time goes by and the track gets more serious. By the way we're doing trackdays in Dubai at the Dubai Autodrome.

Roy I think you were faster due to skills maybe, but let's not forget NA are generally lighter than the GTSt. Also luck plays a role as well as he may have slipped for a split second which accounts for the time difference.

I think my current Marshal KU17 92W R16 are ok but I might need to upgrade to steel re-inforced side walls. I am working on the car, have been for 4 months now and there always seem to be improvements to be made.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214339-d2-suspension/#findComment-3786360
Share on other sites

Roy I think you were faster due to skills maybe, but let's not forget NA are generally lighter than the GTSt. Also luck plays a role as well as he may have slipped for a split second which accounts for the time difference.

We swapped keys, he drove my car for a session and i drove his. We both agreed that my car was a little more dull but had more grip and the times it did showed. Hios car was tighter and dartier, but less grip and slower. Could have been tyres, alignment etc etc. So, meh, not sure how much water my point holds. Before after times etc always make a good indication rather then seat of pants :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214339-d2-suspension/#findComment-3786402
Share on other sites

i didnt say that they didnt have R&D put into them (any new product has to) what i am saying is that its not suficent. also the build quality is poor, i have seen the mounting brackets (S13) snap in what could be deemed as a small incident (car got about 1 foot of air)

these coilovers are built in china on a tight budget and it shows, unfortunatly most people that would even consider fitting these to their car would think that they're the ducks nuts cause all of a suden its a stiff, jumpy and 'feels' exciting which 'feels' fast... it took me a while to learn that a boring ride/drive is often alot faster :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214339-d2-suspension/#findComment-3786509
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...