Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

forgot to add this

theres a form of modding a import that is 10x worse then riceing it up, and that is the so called DRIFT PIG i know of ppl who have had nice cars but decided to turn there cars into drift cops even tho they dont drift but are just after a drifter image crazy,,, i rekon

see now, it comes down to what u define as rice, these are the 2 main ones ive heard: very asian inspired eccentric styling, and modification which is made to make the car look like it is faster than it is or using a performance part for cosmetic reasons. and i gotta say, that 2nd definition applies to pretty much everyone on this site. so really there is a bit of rice in everyone. i do agree with you though, people look for that thrashed out look to make it look like there car gets thrashed, when in fact it doesnt. imo its that mentality which is everything wrong with the import scene these days.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Who cares what style people define your car as... if you like it, that's all that matters, and if you like it, chances are someone else is going to like it too.

We all drive ricer cars, given that this is a Skyline forum and the term rice refers to the Japanese car scene... but who cares? Not me.

no mate its not about how much money they've spent on their car

its about cars that are highly modded and showing the viewers the mods in detail

im sure if you had a tough car you wouldn't say no to a magazine or DVD cover/feature

personally i always wanted me car to be on the cover of a mag and it was a massive achievement for me and great exposure for my business

Why are you defending yourself to a fu*kstick who only has 5 posts and is obviously here to start a shit fight?

Outlaw, you need to make some usefull posts before you start bitching about 'ricers'.

Bad day today, sorry :rofl:

not sure what you want to define it as but LED tail lights on r32's or any skyline is rice, shit, gay whatever you want to call it

Even worse on 180's....the ghey round ones that bug out look so damn ugly.

Notice how they all go for a round tail light......everyone wants a skyline...LoL

HAHAHA would make a good sig.

Even worse on 180's....the ghey round ones that bug out look so damn ugly.

Notice how they all go for a round tail light......everyone wants a skyline...LoL

You're fuggin joking right? You think the old style tail lights in the 1st pic look better than the updated Type X style lights? The older style look absolutely terrible compared to Type X lights!

post-5850-1211347576_thumb.jpg

post-5850-1211348746_thumb.jpg

Edited by ~Hypnotik~
You're fuggin joking right? You think the old style tail lights in the 1st pic look better than the updated Type X style lights? The older style look absolutely terrible compared to Type X lights!

Show us what these 'updated type x lights' look like.

But yeh so far if i had a 180 id have those lights in the 1st pic,maybe tint them a little.

You're fuggin joking right? You think the old style tail lights in the 1st pic look better than the updated Type X style lights? The older style look absolutely terrible compared to Type X lights!

I'm steering towards the the older style but topped off with a Origin / Vertex Bodykit and no spoiler.

Type X, at 1st I thought it was an aftermarket thing but found out its a factory (updated as you said) Guess I don't mind.

AS LONG as its not on a S15. If you have a S15 stick to the factory rear lights. I saw one this morning and made the car look cheap and tacky IMO.

AS LONG as its not on a S15. If you have a S15 stick to the factory rear lights. I saw one this morning and made the car look cheap and tacky IMO.

IMO the stocko yellow indicator section is ugly as and the crystal versions (that keep the red part red, and simply make the indicator clear) are a massive improvement

IMO the stocko yellow indicator section is ugly as and the crystal versions (that keep the red part red, and simply make the indicator clear) are a massive improvement

Yeah I seen that before, gives it an updated look but I guess I just prefer the the orange indicator.

post-46584-1211353827_thumb.jpgpost-46584-1211353918_thumb.jpg

Guest trikdoutvl

GAY RICE

gt wings are ghey full stop

30 inch cannons on ur exhaust are ghey

bov that sound like a hampster having a orgasim are the WORST modifications eva

stupid coloured leds in ur lights are ghey

20 inch chromies are ghey

so low u caint enter a car park GHEY

having a shopping list down the side of ur car when u dont have any parts from them

SICK IMPORT

nice clean painted car (ALL 1 COLOUR)

nice bodykit in good nick

nice set of 17 or 18 mags

nice clean interior with a few gauges n some bucket seats

not overly loud just a lovely rb humming

limo tint

thats the wat i feel

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...