Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

guys ... if I had someone who can remap my stock R34 ecu, who can up the boost (to 10.5 - 11 ) and fix up the AFR - would this be a better alternative to getting a safc and boost controller? I mean it'd be cheaper but are there any disadvantages of doing it like that?

guys ... if I had someone who can remap my stock R34 ecu, who can up the boost (to 10.5 - 11 ) and fix up the AFR - would this be a better alternative to getting a safc and boost controller? I mean it'd be cheaper but are there any disadvantages of doing it like that?

Well you will need some sort of boost control to dial a setting in and piss the solenoid off. If you are thinking about a Dr Drift remap, this could be a bleed valve or EBC. Then you can dial in the boost you want.

The remap will sort your R&R issues which you will encounter.

Other thing, so you dont freak out, is that chances are once you dial in 10.5 -> 11 psi it will reach that mid range but will trickle off at top end. Probably losing 2-3 psi.

People seem to have had great success with DrDrift, but keep in mind, you will not be able to turn up to any workshop and have it re-tuned once the time comes as opposed to a Power FC, Microtec etc...

I think thats all.. :geek: lol

guys ... if I had someone who can remap my stock R34 ecu, who can up the boost (to 10.5 - 11 ) and fix up the AFR - would this be a better alternative to getting a safc and boost controller? I mean it'd be cheaper but are there any disadvantages of doing it like that?

Mate - go to the NSW section of these forums.

see the thread started by sidr20 - "TOSHI REMAP"

in that thread is a link to TOSHI's own little section of the forum/website.

have a chat with him.

just so you understand.

1. SAFC = Super Air Fuel Controller (or computer or something) - it is simply a signal bender.

It sits beween the AFM and the ECU.

the AFM sends a signal to the ECU saying there is x amount of air going past my shaft and the ECU adjust the amount of fuel to suit it's programming.

with the SAFC there, the AFM goes, "hey.. there is x amount of air going past my shaft"

the SAFC goes "no worries habbib.. I'll let the komputa know bro.. I swear to allah bro.."

The SAFC then turns to the ecu and goes "bro.. da afm called and sed dat der is only z amount of air coming in and dat your a fat kunt"

the ecu then gets angry and goes on a diet and reduces the amount of fuel so the mixture is all leaner.

and you get more power.

however, since it only lies about the amount of air, the ecu makes the changes to fuel it needs to get the mixture it is supposed to as programmed.

it doesn't make any changes to timing so you "could" have issues with detonation/pinging.

the expensive PFC or other stand alone ecu's are not signal benders.

they have total control over everything and don't need other devices to lie about stuff.

AN ECU remap/reflash/rechip or whatever you want to call it is a way to re-program the standard ecu.

the standard ecu's program from factory obviously says.

if air = x then add y amount of fuel.

and all is well

then we get our hands on these cars and want to hear that sweat rb sound - large exhaust goes on.

we want hektik spool sound - pod filter goes on.

we want to go faster - boost controller and more boost goes on.

on the factory mapping, it is obviously designed to go mega rich with the extra air that you get from boost etc.

TOSHI and others reprogram this ecu.

they tell it to give this much timing and this much fuel when it receives this much air.

and you get a faster car, more power, less fuel used and still safe.

TOSHI's remap/chip prices are very good.

have a read of that thread and contact him yourself.

forget the SAFC.

it is a dirty dirty liar.

when did you notice the power drop from the timing belt changed? as soon as you picked it up after the change? if you really think it was lots slower id pull the front cover off and check it or have someone check it for you as from what you said they only checked ignition timing and not cam timing. the figure means nothing if you think it lost that much power.

Edited by adam87

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...