Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

today i went to vicroads to clear my defect,as i was leaving vicroads,vic police/vic roads pulled me over..they took photos of my cooler pipe and my battery tray..they told me that they will be making a report in regards about the cars infrastructure,because it dosnt comply with the australian standards..

but the chassy hasnt been touched,only the battery tray has a hole and its done perfectly..they said i might need a engineers cerfticate..

What do i do now?has anybody experienced this before?they also said that new law has come out to target those battery trays

btw its jdms15

any help would be appreciated..

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221177-im-in-trouble-need-help/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you car came with an airbag (which S15's do), and you have cut a hole where there was not one from the factory (due to a FMIC piping or something)... then you sir are in a fair predicament. :down:

Engineers wont sign off on that ever, as they don't want to risk being liable should an airbag not work and so on

You'll have to find someone who will repair it, and repair it to a level that you would be lucky to pick/see because engineers wont even sign off on a repaired cut.

This is from a VicRoads approved engineer who's working on my car when we were talking about holes in the chassis/body/etc

Also.. Police have only recently become tight on this, a law/ruling that been there forever

So yeah, i expect to see more of this type of thing happening once people get too smart for the EPA, they will then go back to digging into ADR's and other crap in the next 18-24months i suspect as people are becoming smarter than the EPA will ever be :)

Of course, there are lots that still aren't smart so could take a while to pin all of those people, hell, it might never change

the issue wont be hole, it will be that now that the metal has been modified they can no longer predict how the car will crumble in an accident

as this will play a key role in your safety and how the airbags operate, they basically say its "unsupported" and thus could be marked as non-compliant

the fact that you have a rubber grommet around it and an intercooler pipe inside it probably means nothing, as the hole is still there

when nissan certified the vehicle with airbags and no hole there on their CAD simulator and testing bench etc it reacted a certain way

now the chassis is different, it will re-act differently. its a shame as my car has been modified the same way, dirty big hole under the washer bottle

and my car is fitted with dual airbags so ill have the same issue when i am picked up for it. my first course of action would be to speak to a workshop / engineering place and ask them

as ultimately they would have to sign off it i would guess, i would be asking them whats required to make it pass, which i suspect would be a fair bit of fabrication work etc

Correct , by law, officers are not allowed to force you or physically touch your car, i.e. open up your bonnet etc or take pictures of it without your consent - but I know how you felt, you were nervous and in the moment. I suggest you speak to Vicroads and do all that you can to get this cleared up asap, as I know getting an import registered nowadays is harder than before.

Correct , by law, officers are not allowed to force you or physically touch your car, i.e. open up your bonnet etc or take pictures of it without your consent - but I know how you felt, you were nervous and in the moment. I suggest you speak to Vicroads and do all that you can to get this cleared up asap, as I know getting an import registered nowadays is harder than before.

So if I get pulled over by a cop and he looks like he wants to give me a defect for under bonnet stuff I can say no I'm not going to open the bonnet?

With all this stuff coming out and being enforced it makes me glad I've got an aussie daily driver.

Lol, Russ your still a massive target with that loud exhaust you have on your "aussie daily". I had a similar problem with my old 32. I welded in a supporting ring of still around the hole, that way the load would be transfered around the steel ring, and the section that was cut would retain is structural strength. Don't know if that would still fly these days, i dare say it wouldn't.

Lol, Russ your still a massive target with that loud exhaust you have on your "aussie daily".

Yeah but at least it doesn't have a GT wing. haha. Mufflers are cheap, clearing a heavy defect on a turbo import isn't.

If you car came with an airbag (which S15's do), and you have cut a hole where there was not one from the factory (due to a FMIC piping or something)... then you sir are in a fair predicament. :D

Engineers wont sign off on that ever, as they don't want to risk being liable should an airbag not work and so on

You'll have to find someone who will repair it, and repair it to a level that you would be lucky to pick/see because engineers wont even sign off on a repaired cut.

This is from a VicRoads approved engineer who's working on my car when we were talking about holes in the chassis/body/etc

I dont doubt thats what was said to you, and this is not an attack on you, just a general rant! ;)

How the fark wont they apply some common sense and approve a modded inner guard skin, or a repaired skin? How is it any different then a car that has had a minor hit in the front that needs a new inner guard. Or a hit up the ass that needs a new beaver panel. Its farking laughable that they wont approve a vehicle.

It shits me that more and more it seems that stupid muppets seem to be holding positions of influence over the rest of us. Not just specifically related to cars, but in all facets of life :laugh:

Personally Ash, if this is the engineer that is working on your car then i would suggest speaking to someone else. He seems to be encouraging the legislation as it gives him power, influence over car enthusiasts which seems to make his business more profitable. There is a fair chance he is abusing the trust you have placed in him and is taking you for a ride! :D

Its a sad day when an engineer doesnt challenge stupidity and isnt willing to sign off on something that panel beaters do as a matter of routine!

If you dont have airbags you'll be fine J.

GunR32 - VicRoads will just tell you to talk to an engineer, even the VicRoads consultant engineers, will tell you to talk to an engineer.

Unfortunately they dont want anything to do with it most of the time, and the people @ the counters probably wont have any idea.

Go to the VicRoads website, and call the approved engineers and go to them from the start, i found VicRoads to be a waste of time dealing with (as they always are)

EDIT: Just saw your reply Troy.

Its not the first Engineer to tell me this, thats the worry point. I've been told 3 times now, 3 separate engineers.

Unless then are all colluding like petrol retailers or something, i dunno :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...