Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Different people have different opinions - I don't see it's any reason to get upset or start slinging insults around.

Some people don't see a point in the 'stance' or 'big camber' movement, whilst others love it. At the end of the day, it's just a thing of personal taste - though I can see how Dohmar's reply could be seen as a criticism or personal attack.

Pic shown was clearly on a public road. One would assume that the car is a street car, setup for that whole bosuzoku camber-as-f**k scene. Which has nothin to do with performance. If you had a pic of that car with that camber on a track, I wouldn't be asking questions as I can appreciate camber on a track car, but in all the professional racing (ie not drift) they have sensible camber - one where it maximises the contact patch, not deliberately making the camber so negative that it reduces the lateral grip.

So yes, *Excessive* camber is dumb. Maybe ya'll got a different definition what is excessive but from my narrow minded opinion, cars were meant to grip around corners (I do admire drift dont get me wrong but its an entirely different train of philosophy to 3/4's of car events - that being grip is good, slip is bad). Practical camber? You want it for a road vehucle, a drift vehicle, a time attack vehicle or a drag car? Apples aint apples. And yeah from that pic, it looks totally over the top... not having a dig at your setup if it is a proper drift car but

Nice to see Weezy is still a spineless stooge who runs 0 camber... as per last time :)

-D

EDIT - And yes, I was a tad undiplomatic - thats a dope photo no doubt about it, I just ask myself WTF when I see that much camber on a street car

sorry,

but in all the professional racing (ie not drift) they have sensible camber - one where it maximises the contact patch, not deliberately making the camber so negative that it reduces the lateral grip.

i'm sorry, but i think you've got your wires crossed, generally what limits negative camber, is braking, not lateral grip. for example v8 supercars run -5.5 camber, if this falls within your definition of sensible camber, then mine must almost fall under the same category. only a few years back a few teams were experimenting with -7, but had issues with braking, generally anything after -6 your braking performance begins to fall off, up to that you're generally only helping your times by increasing lateral grip, obviously there are other factors to consider, different tyres and suspension types, but i'm not going to get into that. drifting we require front grip, however our geometry is flipped on itself as we carry through a corner with opposite lock, and due to the amounts of steering angle compared to that of a car under grip conditions, the static camber has less of an effect due to the caster angle and SAI's effect on dynamic camber, and the fact that static camber has less and less of an effect the more steering angle there is.

2ndly, not sure how a car being driven on the street automatically leads to the assumption that it never gets driven on the track :S

sorry,

i'm sorry, but i think you've got your wires crossed, generally what limits negative camber, is braking, not lateral grip. for example v8 supercars run -5.5 camber, if this falls within your definition of sensible camber, then mine must almost fall under the same category. only a few years back a few teams were experimenting with -7, but had issues with braking, generally anything after -6 your braking performance begins to fall off, up to that you're generally only helping your times by increasing lateral grip, obviously there are other factors to consider, different tyres and suspension types, but i'm not going to get into that. drifting we require front grip, however our geometry is flipped on itself as we carry through a corner with opposite lock, and due to the amounts of steering angle compared to that of a car under grip conditions, the static camber has less of an effect due to the caster angle and SAI's effect on dynamic camber, and the fact that static camber has less and less of an effect the more steering angle there is.

2ndly, not sure how a car being driven on the street automatically leads to the assumption that it never gets driven on the track :S

I live in adelaide. My bad. Cops ever saw that camber here in adelaide you'd be having some srs difficulties. You'd probably know this already

Also, ur pic makes it look like ur running 10+ degrees, Its nice that you fill out those camber details for us novices to take in, cause now I've learned something and have something to compare it against. My knowledge is all from grippage and not drift, so my apologies for being off the mark - what you posted is excellent.

End is, I dont think that theres any circumstance that I would run that much camber. Me not being a drifter and that.

And as to my first post - yes - as JRM said, it was cosmetic - it just looks dumb IMHO (unless you're the 0.05% population that is well versed in the lore of drift)

-D

we'll have to agree to disagree, if i had a time attack car where i found the optimal setting was -6 degrees camber, i'd happily run that on the street, even if some people thought it looked silly, at the end of the day, what's a little tyre wear on the street compared to improved lap times out on the track?

we'll have to agree to disagree, if i had a time attack car where i found the optimal setting was -6 degrees camber, i'd happily run that on the street, even if some people thought it looked silly, at the end of the day, what's a little tyre wear on the street compared to improved lap times out on the track?

Guess that all depends if you're a racer or just a dude who drives it as a daily

-D

Guess that all depends if you're a racer or just a dude who drives it as a daily

-D

You love arguing on the interwebz don't you lol.

Oh to have as much spare time on my hands as you do

  • 2 weeks later...

What was the event run like, how many runs did you do, did you get to line up against whoever you wanted/or was it more structured? I might have to take the V35 whale out next time and see if I can crack a 13.XX :)

It was run ok imo, the only hold ups were when a few cars leaked fluid on the start line. I got 8 runs in from 10am till 6pm with a fair few breaks between, i think that was reasonable considering there were 160 cars registered. Would of been nice to have the line up more arranged,we got in line and didnt know who we were up against until we got to the front, you could try count but some cars would pull out or be tow cars, 'Jap Star' and I were 1 car apart a few times. Drag day on the cards for SAU ;)

The 12.3 was with Yokohama semis on 15psi, launched at 3-3500 with no spin. Also made a 12.6 with Dunlop street tyres at 3000rpm with minor spin in 1st and 2nd. Dropping the psi and doing a decent skid helped reduce wheel spin massivly on the street tyres.

The 12.3 was with Yokohama semis on 15psi, launched at 3-3500 with no spin. Also made a 12.6 with Dunlop street tyres at 3000rpm with minor spin in 1st and 2nd. Dropping the psi and doing a decent skid helped reduce wheel spin massivly on the street tyres.

great time bud excellent for stick infact what power u running?

1.9 is really good bud with a manual, it sounds funny but the 60 is the hardest part 1.7 in a manual is going to take alot of mechanical abuse if it hooks up lol good fun trying tho 1.7 would take u to a 11.94 , may need same launch but just a few more horses to get u there

some blokes in autos cant make a sub 2.0 60 so u done real well

Edited by JETURBO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...