Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Question is though, will the cheaper oils do the job? Even if you have to change them twice as much?

Really what are the longterm benefits a of running a expensive group IV oil or better?

Is the added expense really worth it?

absolutely nothing wrong with using the above group III / IV blends - one thing at people on SAU got right is changing out @ 5000km intervals - at this interval w/ enthusiastic street driving using normal from-the-shop oils is going to provide 95% of the protection which should allow any enthusiast to sleep well at night

what you're getting when ure buying group IV / V oils is a stronger and more stable film flowing between metal-metal contact as the temperature goes up - oil goes off when you bring it up to very high temps then let it cool down and then bring it up again - eg. street applications

even race oils are designed to work only for small periords before they are dumped becase they do not have detergents like street oil to be used over several heat cycles

at 5000kms without total prolonged abuse of mongrel driving the differnces would be negligable between a $50 oil and a $100 oil

its when ure pushing the car @ full throttle for extended periods - you will be able to differentiate between the off-the-shelf stuff and the boutiques eg track days or if you drive like a lunatic through the hills on a weekly basis

IMO the only to to better this situation is to change out expensive oils just as often - i reckon if ure changing out good oil more often than the boutique stuff - that is a better way of looking after the motor - good oil meaning the good castrol syntec or edge / nulon fast flow / penrite HPR etc putting junk group II's and III's will just give you grief if you're going to drive enthusiastically

good way to tell good oils from your local store is to look for the ACEA A3/A4 certification on the back - this is a stringent standard in europe which details the sheer stability and high-heat strength in 30w and 40w oils

i wouldn't be putting in a 30w unless it had the ACEA A3/A4 certification - this will usually be on thicker 30w deeming them suitable for enthusiastic use - most 40w's being thicker will have this protection and IMO is the best weight for most motors - the perfect balance between cold and hot viscosity, not to heavy that the motor struggles to push it through the oil pump and the motor and not too thin that at high temps that it sheers and breaks down

that's why in aus people seem to preach thick 50/60/70w oils but don't understand that too thick is just as bad as being too thin

good motto to go by is 'thinnest cold weight possible / thickest hot weight as neccessary - for me 0/5/10w-40 is the best viscosity with 10w-40 being the most ideal as the gap between numbers is kept to a minimum meaning that it uses the least amout of viscosity modifiers to maintain sheer stability and high heat applicaitons

being in australia without any sub-zero temperatures means you will experience no cold start issues with a 10w where as im america where it dips below -30deg is when you might have a 'winter' oil and a 'summer' oil

Question is though, will the cheaper oils do the job? Even if you have to change them twice as much?

Very good info, thanks!

So what's the benefit of getting a 5w oil over a 10w? Temps do not get into tjr negatives here, but are thinner oils better on startup? Should you run the thinnest possible?

Nissan recommend a 7.5w oil, personally I have been using motel excess 5w40, purely because thats what the previous owner used, but now trying to do my own research and make up my own mind if its worth the extra bucks when I rarely push the car.

Mostly because 10w oils are cheaper then 5w, how would one feel about castrol magnatec? Or shell helix in the 10w40? Those are cheap...

Ive used Motul 8100 10w40 for many years which has keen my engine very healthy. 165,000 kms

Pretty much 170 compression across all cylinders and inside I have been told is clean

Will be switching to Castrol 10w60w as will be doing more trackwork. As mentioned above Racepace and Trent uses this oil in there race cars

Very good info, thanks!

So what's the benefit of getting a 5w oil over a 10w? Temps do not get into tjr negatives here, but are thinner oils better on startup? Should you run the thinnest possible?

Nissan recommend a 7.5w oil, personally I have been using motel excess 5w40, purely because thats what the previous owner used, but now trying to do my own research and make up my own mind if its worth the extra bucks when I rarely push the car.

Mostly because 10w oils are cheaper then 5w, how would one feel about castrol magnatec? Or shell helix in the 10w40? Those are cheap...

a 5W will be thinner on start-up yes - but since temperatures her in Aus do not dip low enough - the motor will very hardly notice the difference in weight IMO due to the temps

Motul 8100 X-Cess is a brillant oil - and when you can get it for $70 - it is by far the most well made / top performing oil in that price bracket and beyond

Castrol Magnatec and Helix are made only from group III and some cheap oils are still a group II / III blend - they are cheap because they lubricate just enough to keep cars running

with a over 12yr old twin-turbo GTR pushing 300hp from the factory - you can imagine the heat generated whist driving - its not really whether you drive like a mongrel - with oils like magnatec - you are risking all types of failure everytime you decide to give it a hit - would stick to Edge if you're Castrol inclided / or Helix Ultra if you are Shell inclined - which can be had for around $50-70 - so really the 8100 X-Cess is a clear choice i reckon

Will be switching to Castrol 10w60w as will be doing more trackwork. As mentioned above Racepace and Trent uses this oil in there race cars

definately a good choice for track oil - i would ask them about the viscosity modifiers used in a 10w-60 though - Motuls 300V race oil is a 15W-50 - where the gap between hot and cold is a lot less - meaning its less likely to sheer in high temp applications (meaning break down from a 60w to maybe a 40w which could cause your motor to lean out at that heat)

if you're doing constant trackdays and changing out the oil each meet the Castrol is a great budget oil for multiple occasions - but if your going maybe once / twice a year and want to drive ten tenths / the full gusto / complete mongrel i would go with the Group V Motul 300V Competition 15w-50 or Motul Lemans 20w-60 and go gangbusters - note how the gap between weights is much less

Motuls new EsterCore range (replaces the previous range) is more geared specifically for limited used on a track- meaning it has been developed to lubricate significantly better during extreme use ie. trackdays but as a consequence its is a lot less ideal for streetable applications and normal drain intervals - i woul be changing it out either every track day if your car is a beast or every 3-4 mths / 5000Kms which ever comes first - the time the oil spends in the sump is the one to watch

i definately don't know better than tuners and engine builders - but just based on the science of oil - it never hurts to ask questions and to be intelligent about it - alot of the time people simply use what works without too much curiosity to find the best solution

Edited by squareznboxez

Doing some more reading, spewing I got my gtr too late, missed out on stocking up on some sougie. Was excellent value for such a high quality oil.

How does the new gulf western oil synx 6000 stack up to motul 8100 and the other group vi/v variants?

Also penrite hpr 5w40 is well priced, is it of similar quality to magnatec and the cheaper shell range?

on pg 136

thought to post this as i inquired with Gulf Western regarding their Syn-X range as to what base stocks they use, this was the response i got;

Daniel,

We use Group III in Syn X 3000 and Group III / Group IV in Syn X 6000.

If manufacturing licensed blends in modern API grades, the engine tests are only performed in these base stocks.

Regards

Ben Vicary

Gulf Western Oil

to be claiming Syn-X 3000 is a Motul 8100 equivalent without any justification other than that it feels the same doesn't really tell the whole story about the performance differences of these 2 oils

I've also read reports the the Mobil 1 range is made from a different formulation from a 100% Group IV PAO base, to a Group III / IV blend - which is same as the Syn-X 6000 variant of Gulf Western

although in this day and age, oil's additive packs are just as important as the base-stocks, at the end of the day group IV PAO base stocks are smoother and more expensive to make, Group V being even more so - an oils manufacturer's certifications should also be taken into account

so most things you can grab from a brick-and-mortar shop are made from either straight Group III or blends of Group III / Group IV base stocks (Nulon, Castrol, Mobil, Penrite etc)

the only real Group IV formulated oils i can think of are Motul's 8100 range, Royal Purple and Redline

and Motul 300V and Amsoil being the only real Group V oils

hope this clears up any confusion, not trying to start any wars, just thought to share some info i've come across in my reading

definately not, the syn-x 6000 is a group III / IV blend making it compariable to your likes of Castrol Edge / Nulon / Mobil1 / Penrite

Motul 8100 is a group IV / V blend which is amongst your Redline / Royal Purple / Amsoil / Liqui-Moly Synthoil

Edited by squareznboxez

definately not, the syn-x 6000 is a group III / IV blend making it compariable to your likes of Castrol Edge / Nulon / Mobil1 / Penrite

Motul 8100 is a group IV / V blend which is amongst your Redline / Royal Purple / Amsoil / Liqui-Moly Synthoil

That's because Gulf Western have a different PAO group IV, Gulf 1, but it is too thick for my liking, perhaps for a track car...

http://www.gulfwestern.com.au/Petrol%20Oil_Gulf1.html

I still have a few bottles of GW's group V Sougi 6000 here, when it runs out I may have to find another ethanol suitable oil...

The Edge 10w60 will be fine for an RB motor - I know of several that have had consistent thrashing and have held up fine - all data I can find on the internet says that the Edge 10w60 and 0w40 is a PAO Group 4 so unless you have proof that it's not Squareznboxez, maybe you should stop making such claims? There is a LOT of opinion based shit on BITOG as well, I've read enough crap on there too! I wouldn't get too hung up on viscosity anyway. Those two grades are also significantly more expensive than 5w30, 25w50 etc.

When i was researching what oil to use in my L76, I could not find any hard evidence about the Royal Purple HPS, so if you have some, could you please share? (discounting the discredited Street Commodores 'comparison')

Different motors I know, but if there were issues with running such "thick" oil in LS motors (when the factory fill is 5w30), it would have become apparent at some point over the last 10 years, and that's with a 10000km drain interval for most (granted they are N/A pushrod motors, but still machined to very fine tolerances).

very happy to be proven wrong - i'm definately not trying to stir anyting up other than an intelligent debate and questions (which is what's going on i think); my deduction that all Castrol Edge variants use a Group III/IV blend comes from here;

re - Royal Purple's SN rated oils, this is a statement from one of their reps;

Registered: 08/12/12

Posts: 343

Loc: indiana I emailed RP this: i would like to know if the base stocks used in the API SN oils are hydrocracked group III oils or if they are primarily PAO group IV as many other high end synthetics.

Their reply was:

"Good morning Donny,"

"Although Royal Purple oil formulations are considered proprietary, I am authorized to share with you that we use a proprietary combination of premium synthetic Group IV(PAO) and Group V base stocks. The additive packages are also the very best available for each."

source: http://www.bobistheo...=2782625&page=1

re - Castrol Edge 10w-60 SN

definately not trying to bash Castrol - however being one of the largest manufactures of oil they are seemingly conservative in the information they disclose about their base stocks -

Castrol's 10w-60 came in 3 variants;

- Edge TMS Motorsport - manufactured in the EU - see bottom left of bottle

13811_x800.jpg

- Edge Professional (bottle on the right) - manufactured in the EU - see bottom mid - to the right of the BP symbol

IMG_0619.jpg

- Castrol Edge 10w-60 SN - manufactured in Malaysia - see under the black line where it says 'this product is not suitable vehicles with diesel particulate filters' - this is the version available in Australia

IMG_0113.jpg

IMG_0112.jpg

the most definitive info i could find regarding Castrol's 10w-60 being a full group IV oil was here;

There is no such thing as the best oil.

The Castrol Edge range is formulated with different base oils to give the best results for the different engines each has been designed for.

You cannot judge the performance of an engine oil by its base stock.

Edge Sport 25W/50 is a mineral oil based on Grp II base stock, as it has been designed for older & larger 2-valve pushrod engines with roller rockers. Synthetics, like Grp IV base oils, do not build up a good film on roller rockers as well as a mineral oil, where valve train forces are very high.

Edge Sport 0W/40 & 10W/60 are synthetic Grp IV products and designed for engines with sliding valve trains or 4 valves or more per cylinder with roller rockers, where valve train loads are lighter than the 2 valve engines and where engine speeds are higher.

Edge Sport 5W/30 is a happy medium utilizing Grp III (HVI) base oils, which provide virtually all of the benefits of Grp IV but at a slightly lower cost.

Whatever works for a jet engine does NOT necessarily work for a car engine, even if it makes a good storyline.

source: http://datnet.org/to...trol-qa-thread/

Going off the CAS identifiers there is evidence from the Material Safety Datasheet (MSDS) to support that the 0w-40 and 10w-60 SN variant of Castrol Edge is a Hydro-treated group III blend formula

Castrol Edge 0w-40 A3/B4

http://msdspds.castr...-40%20A3_B4.pdf

Dec-1-ene, trimers,

hydrogenated

REACH #: 01-

2119493949-12

EC: 500-393-3

CAS: 157707-86-3 /

68037-01-4

50 - 100 Not classified. Asp. Tox. 1, H304 [1]

definition of 1-decene as per wikipedia;

The industrial processes used in the production of 1-decene are oligomerization of ethylene by the Ziegler Process or by the cracking of petrochemical waxes.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decene

Castrol Edge 10w-60 SN

MSDS

https://www.ils.co.n...SDS/3374732.pdf

Base oil - unspecified Varies 50 - 95

Phenol, dodecyl- 121158-58-5 0 - 0.1

Molybdenum polysulphide long chain alkyl dithiocarbamide complex Proprietary 0.1 - 1

Zinc alkyl dithiophosphate 68649-42-3 0.1 - 1

the chemical dodecyl is a hyrdo-carbon composite as per google;

https://www.google.c...iw=1760&bih=886

from my reading the edge range with the exception of the now superseded German-made Castrol Syntec 0w-30 (uses group IV only) use both Group III and IV in their formulations - also regarding the 'titanium' tag - most synthetics use Molybdenum which is more expensive to produce and as a result more robust;

Castrol took advantage of the "gimmick". Titanium sounds like it's strong. It sounds like it makes your engine tough as steel. Therefore it works for advertising.

From what I understand, it is a similar alternative to Molybdenum and cheaper at that; the difference in performance seems to be that Moly after continuous use bonds to the metal parts of your engine and forms a kind of 'invisible shield' to protect your parts. This is particularly with extended use (i.e. if you are using the new SN SOPUS products frequently every at every OCI). Titanium bonds WITH the metals on your engine while it is in use, but does not form any lasting 'shield'.

This is a chemistry fantasy description of course, but it seems this is what the additives do, at least from my reading on it.

source - http://www.bobistheo...&Number=2724737

fair bit of info (as well as hot-headed opinions) here;

http://www.bobistheo...=2813661&page=1

hopefully this provided some insight into the science of the oils we are all exposed to - i'm not trying to put down any oil or anyone i just thought to bring what i think are facts to light and am happy to be rebutted / contested / corrected for anyone else with facts

The Edge 10w60 will be fine for an RB motor - I know of several that have had consistent thrashing and have held up fine - all data I can find on the internet says that the Edge 10w60 and 0w40 is a PAO Group 4 so unless you have proof that it's not Squareznboxez, maybe you should stop making such claims? There is a LOT of opinion based shit on BITOG as well, I've read enough crap on there too! I wouldn't get too hung up on viscosity anyway. Those two grades are also significantly more expensive than 5w30, 25w50 etc.

When i was researching what oil to use in my L76, I could not find any hard evidence about the Royal Purple HPS, so if you have some, could you please share? (discounting the discredited Street Commodores 'comparison')

Different motors I know, but if there were issues with running such "thick" oil in LS motors (when the factory fill is 5w30), it would have become apparent at some point over the last 10 years, and that's with a 10000km drain interval for most (granted they are N/A pushrod motors, but still machined to very fine tolerances).

Edited by squareznboxez

One of the issues of making blanket recommendations is that every engine will be different. A tighter engine will run happily on ‘thinner’ oil such as a 0W30, but if you’ve got an engine with loose clearances then it will reduce bearing life. The engine failure thread is littered with examples of RB engines spinning bearings. This is not scientific of course, but most examples seem to be running oil on the thinner side of the spectrum.

Therefore the best oil for the engine in question depends entirely on the engine in question. Where build specs or kilometres are unknown, it is (at least in my opinion) better to go with a ‘thicker’ oil.

One also has to factor in drain intervals, ambient temperatures the car experiences, and driving conditions. Those in Western Australia will require a different oil to those in Tasmania. Those driving predominately long stints on the freeway will require a different oil to those with a short run in traffic to work. 10W40 oils are a happy medium but aren’t appropriate for long drain intervals due to the large viscosity range. Perfect for the 5,000km drain intervals that most Skyline owners run though. On top of this, there are other aspects to consider such as additives missing from newer oils that may be necessary for the long term reliability of older engines (e.g. zinc and phosphorus).

In my case, based on location, driving conditions and ambient temperatures experienced when I drive the car, as well as the (apparent) build spec of my (Japanese built) engine, I find Nulon 15W50 is the most appropriate after some trial and error. An oil analysis would help confirm this beyond the oil pressure and oil temperature gauges (and listening to how the engine sounds) though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...