Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All.

I have just finished tuning my car and have come up with some curious results. firstly let me say i really don't care what the number is but it would be interesting to find out what the story is here.

previously my car made 254rwkw and 420nm of torque on a dynodynamics machine when i first built the engine on a conservative tune

since then i have retuned it and it is a lot faster and has a lot mor torque. this time it was done on a dynodynamics and it made a max of 220rwkw but it made 65onm of torque.

the setup is an RB30det with hiflow, the tune was done in normal ramp mode not shoot6, tyre pressure was the same. temp probe was hanging it the air like normal,

the dyno just reads 20% less than before, boost is now 18psi and before it was 16. i have added more timing and it runs 12:1 dead flat once it reaches full boost.

the car is substantially faster and gtech time is 0.3 0 to 100 faster. so it is not my imagination.

the only difference is that the car was heavily stralled down during the runs. this is because it was trying to climb off the dyno and the operator rightly doing the safe thing.

anyone else have any experience with this?

Yep - have been told that the best way to dyno is to strap the car so it climbs up on the front roller during the power run. This was from a guy who strapped the horsepower heroes cars at summernats - over 1000 rwkw!

And yes generally you'll get a lower power output reading if strapped down hard between the rollers - I got a reading of 260rwkw and the bloke who dynoed it said it would have read another 15rwkw at the tyres if strapped to sit on the front roller. I've had my car strapped both ways and I like the front roller idea - there was no wheel spin - the day it was strapped between the rollers the tyres copped it.

Cheers

seen its heaps of times, when it isnt strapped down tight enough, it will climb off the rear roller and make it read higher as all that force is going straight through one roller instead of two, although i think the resistance is apllied through that one roller, it still seems to make quite a difference. that said, you should be making more than 220 IMO (yes i know every dyno is different and they are a tuning tool not a yard stick, it should still read higher than 220)

seen its heaps of times, when it isnt strapped down tight enough, it will climb off the rear roller and make it read higher as all that force is going straight through one roller instead of two, although i think the resistance is apllied through that one roller, it still seems to make quite a difference. that said, you should be making more than 220 IMO (yes i know every dyno is different and they are a tuning tool not a yard stick, it should still read higher than 220)

true..!!

DD units have the retarder unit in the front roller only I believe. 80% of cars i see tuned rise up onto the single, front roller anyway when strapped. Soft tires with low pressure are "supposed" to sap power, but 35+ rwkw's? Hrrrrm... mystery

There is alot of power to be had in correct strapping. My opinion is that the straps should be almost verticle pulling directly towards the ground. The attatchment point should be forward of the axle towards the front of the car so that as the car torque's up it puts more of a moment in pulling th tyre into the roller.

The problem I've seen with letting the car creep up on the front roller is that most cars esspecially turboed cars only situp on the front roller as they come through peak torque and then they sit back down on the rear roller, which causes a huge drop in power as it has to accellerate the rear roller back up to the current wheel speed. So essentially you will inflate the torque figure while reducing the peak horsepower figure.

The other thing to consider is the tyre compound - cause if your producing over 7000N of tractive effort then you could be giving away power through the adhisive forces that some tyres can produce.

And as for tyre choice - I've seen an rb30DET making 310rwkw on street slicks go to 368rwkw on normal hard compound tyres with no change in anything but tyre choice. This car wsa producing over 8000N of tractive effort.

Edited by rob82

yep. i have done some more reading about it and have found the same results.

the car was making 6500 tractive effort with dips and bumps in the curve that look like wheelspin. the cae was tied down HARD and you could feel it trying to walk forward. the rear cradle was point of anchor and the wheels were between the rollers.

Also I thougnt a car making that sort of tractive effort at 4000odd rpm would be making atleast another 50rwkw,

sheets to come later

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...