Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Adz #24 said:

Thanks for the info.

The issue I’m having with my r34 gtt sedan that has no major engine mods that was converted to manual in Japan is that I’m losing traction way to easily in 1st and sometimes in 2nd, (powers just not making it to the ground properly). I’m moving to a wider wheel setup so hopefully this reduces the loss of traction a bit but if not I’m thinking the next option is changing/upgrading the diff.

It’s my daily driver so 1.5 way would be where I’d want to go. Would a vspec GTR diff be an option?

As you can probably tell I’m new to this so slowly learning my way around things.

I'm not going to go into the physics details, because it will start arguments, but wider tyres do not produce more grip on their own.  it comes down more to larger diameter wheels allowing lower profile tyres causing less distortion of the tyre carcass which causes less internal frictional heating which then allows the use of softer compounds.  And the softer compounds cause the coefficient of friction to increase, which is what gives more grip.

So, technically, even without a wider tyre you could have a tyre with a softer compound and pick up grip.

A good diff will help with launch traction, but it's not the only (or even the main) thing going on.  There's a lot of other factors that can be wrong or right, from wheel alignment (specifically camber and toe), to spring and damper rates.  I recently found that decreasing my rear ARB from 24mm to 22mm not only improved the grip in corners, but somewhat surprisingly improved launch traction.  I think this is because it changed the spring-damper coupling, allowing a bit more movement (twist, if you want to think of the way the car will move as the traction load gets applied around the tailshaft).  Not expected, but it's there.  After that there's all sorts of other shit, like the health of the diff and subframe bushes.

An no.  The Vspec diff is the very very worst thing that you could think of putting in there.  Have a read about them.  At least it is sufficiently close to impossible for you to actually put one in there that you won't make the actual mistake of trying.

 

11 hours ago, Adz #24 said:

Thanks for the info.

The issue I’m having with my r34 gtt sedan that has no major engine mods that was converted to manual in Japan is that I’m losing traction way to easily in 1st and sometimes in 2nd, (powers just not making it to the ground properly). I’m moving to a wider wheel setup so hopefully this reduces the loss of traction a bit but if not I’m thinking the next option is changing/upgrading the diff.

It’s my daily driver so 1.5 way would be where I’d want to go. Would a vspec GTR diff be an option?

As you can probably tell I’m new to this so slowly learning my way around things.

It's curious that you're trying to address loss of traction with a diff. Some questions:

  1. What tyres are you running? How much meat is left on them?
  2. What suspension are you running, especially spring rates?
  3. How's your ride height and wheel alignment?

Since your car was modified already in Japan perhaps it has touge-spec rock hard 12kg/mm spring rates? That could easily cause bad traction.

Also on the diff, I have a GTT sedan with a Nismo 1.5-way in it. It's a beautiful diff on the track and spirited driving, and absolute s__thouse in daily driving. Basically, you can't feather the clutch in tight corners/driveways/manoeuvring as it won't lock properly and gets hellishly skippy. I would never ever ever put such a thing in a daily driver. Make sure you take someone else's 1.5/2-way for a good varied drive before making the decision.

Also from my research the GTR diff requires too much mucking around with shafts etc. and is not really a viable option for the GTT.

Just my $0.02

5 hours ago, V28VX37 said:

It's curious that you're trying to address loss of traction with a diff. Some questions:

  1. What tyres are you running? How much meat is left on them?
  2. What suspension are you running, especially spring rates?
  3. How's your ride height and wheel alignment?

Since your car was modified already in Japan perhaps it has touge-spec rock hard 12kg/mm spring rates? That could easily cause bad traction.

Also on the diff, I have a GTT sedan with a Nismo 1.5-way in it. It's a beautiful diff on the track and spirited driving, and absolute s__thouse in daily driving. Basically, you can't feather the clutch in tight corners/driveways/manoeuvring as it won't lock properly and gets hellishly skippy. I would never ever ever put such a thing in a daily driver. Make sure you take someone else's 1.5/2-way for a good varied drive before making the decision.

Also from my research the GTR diff requires too much mucking around with shafts etc. and is not really a viable option for the GTT.

Just my $0.02

1. Pretty much brand new Kumho 245/35/20 +35 on lenso D1R’s

2. Blitz adjustable coilovers but don’t know the spring rate (how would I go about determining this?)

3. Ride is sitting fairly high so I have decent clearance so I can actually get in and out of driverways.

Im fairly new to a lot of this so it is a learning process for me. So it may not be the right thing to do changing to a LSD or I may be even wasting my time investigating this option but I’d rather use the knowledge of people that know and have possibly gone through similar issues. 

^ What Bill said, try a 17 or 18 inch rim with a good tyre and it's likely to help.

Re spring rates, you can measure the length of the spring and the number of coils and run it through an online calculator. Generally high rate springs tend to look really dense so that can be a bit of a giveaway sign.

If your ride is harsh, crashy or sharp over uneven surfaces that could indicate hard suspension... but then again too large a rim with not enough tyre sidewall can show similar symptoms.

13 hours ago, V28VX37 said:

^ What Bill said, try a 17 or 18 inch rim with a good tyre and it's likely to help.

Re spring rates, you can measure the length of the spring and the number of coils and run it through an online calculator. Generally high rate springs tend to look really dense so that can be a bit of a giveaway sign.

If your ride is harsh, crashy or sharp over uneven surfaces that could indicate hard suspension... but then again too large a rim with not enough tyre sidewall can show similar symptoms.

Already had a decent set of 245/45/18 wrapped on Rays and was facing this problem plus the added fact that my clearance was horrible and I ruined my front bumper therefore the move to the larger wheel and higher ride height is the more practical option and not something that I want to move back from for my daily driving purposes so if this is the only way I can resolve the issue then I’ll have to live with it.

Ride is actually fairly smooth (other than the fact I’m driving on the sh1thouse roads of Sydney) with the adjustable blitz coilovers and also feels better with the larger wheel setup I now have.

Ill have a look and try and calculate my spring rate and also look into the setup of my ARB and the quality of the subframe bushes.

  • Like 1

Width and Brand of tyres is not the only thing. If you somehow do not have grip you have chosen very badly when it comes to tyres and perhaps the rims that said tyres sit on (limiting choices of good tyre)


No major engine mods means maximum 180kw. You should be able to maintain the car hooking up to the ground under full noise at nearly double that power. That's how far away from a "good" tractive setup your setup currently is. When people recommend sticky tyres and 18's or 17's the difference would be astronomical. You shouldn't be able to do a power skid on a stock power R34 pretty much ever.

45 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

Width and Brand of tyres is not the only thing. If you somehow do not have grip you have chosen very badly when it comes to tyres and perhaps the rims that said tyres sit on (limiting choices of good tyre)


No major engine mods means maximum 180kw. You should be able to maintain the car hooking up to the ground under full noise at nearly double that power. That's how far away from a "good" tractive setup your setup currently is. When people recommend sticky tyres and 18's or 17's the difference would be astronomical. You shouldn't be able to do a power skid on a stock power R34 pretty much ever.

Aw well guess $1k in performance tyres isn’t good enough I’ll just have to live with this problem.

The KU22 (the real code for the Ecsta 4X) is hardly a performance tyre.  It's literally labelled as a "comfort tyre" by Kumho.  The KU36 was a performance tyre, though now replaced by the V720.

I will confess that my car (R32 with 25Neo) will easily light up the rears on a launch, unless the tyres (V720s) are really warm.  R32s are, however, renowned for not having as good rear geometry as they put onto the 33s onwards.  And the car is also >100kg lighter than a 33 or 34, which doesn't help with weight transfer on launch.  And it is set up for corners. </excuses>

 

  • Like 1

I have half worn KU36 in 235/45R17, not overly hard suspension and the said Nismo 1.5-way. They're 'ok' warm/hot but spin city for the first couple of gears when cold. In the wet, forget about it.

To OP, I reckon the most cost effective test you could do is borrow a pair of 17" stockies from someone, pretty much with any tyre, and drop pressures to high 20's. Go do a couple of launches and report back. If traction improves you might need to downsize your current wheel setup – if not you could start looking at your suspension setup.

Sidenote – The R chassis can't really be dropped much without throwing in a full set of adjustable arms as well. Do you have adjustable rear camber arms and traction rods, and a good alignment from someone knowledgeable?

5 hours ago, V28VX37 said:

I have half worn KU36 in 235/45R17, not overly hard suspension and the said Nismo 1.5-way. They're 'ok' warm/hot but spin city for the first couple of gears when cold. In the wet, forget about it.

To OP, I reckon the most cost effective test you could do is borrow a pair of 17" stockies from someone, pretty much with any tyre, and drop pressures to high 20's. Go do a couple of launches and report back. If traction improves you might need to downsize your current wheel setup – if not you could start looking at your suspension setup.

Sidenote – The R chassis can't really be dropped much without throwing in a full set of adjustable arms as well. Do you have adjustable rear camber arms and traction rods, and a good alignment from someone knowledgeable?

Maybe that’s my next option to look into adjustable rear camber arms and traction rods, anyone in Sydney you’d suggest I could go and see?

Actually, adjustable arms are not trivial.  It's easy to set the camber arm to get the camber you desire.  It is much harder to set the traction arm length to minimise bump steer.  Almost no-one ever does it, and almost all installations are probably worse than the stock arms because of it.

It's a circular process.  Set the camber arm length to get camber right.  This requires that you take a stab at changing the traction arm length also.  Then you have to take it off the wheel aligner (probably), jack it up off the ground, set up your bump steer gauge, fiddle with the traction arm length until you have minimal bump steer, then put it back on the wheel aligner and check and correct the camber, then probably back to the bump steer gauge to make sure that you haven't spoiled it.  Rinse and repeat until no changes are required.  Might take one back and forth, or might take 6.

If you take it to a wheel aligner to do the whole process, it would want to be an expert at setting up this stuff, not your local Bob Jane, etc.  And it will cost a lot more for the labour/service than for the arms.

  • Like 1

Sounds good I’ll speak to Darron at JustJap maybe he can point me in the right direction for alignment.

Or Maybe not lol I’ll just have to live with this for the time being I don’t mind being slightly sideways when I give it a full snoot. (At least it’ll make me behave myself a bit more)

Edited by Adz #24
A
21 hours ago, Adz #24 said:

Kumho Escta 4X

Dude, those are all-season tyres, for snow/freezing weather. Whoever sold them to you, never go back to them.

They came on my Liberty wagon, noisy and trash in wet and dry because it's made for alpine conditions. Replaced them with Hankook K120 (sold out on tyresales), which are an excellent street tyre. What are your tyre size(s)? You could replace the rear pair with something good (then replace the fronts afterwards).

2 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

Dude, those are all-season tyres, for snow/freezing weather. Whoever sold them to you, never go back to them.

They came on my Liberty wagon, noisy and trash in wet and dry because it's made for alpine conditions. Replaced them with Hankook K120 (sold out on tyresales), which are an excellent street tyre. What are your tyre size(s)? You could replace the rear pair with something good (then replace the fronts afterwards).

They are not winter tyres buddy, they are all season, surprisingly winter tyres are called ‘winter tyres’ having lived in Calgary, Canada I know what winter tyres are. I didn’t buy them from shop mate so don’t worry about that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...