Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Mate,

Sure.

$28,000. I'll throw the car in for free!!

Sorry dude, not seperating the lights.

Car goes as is. If I start seperating, I'll end up stripping the whole bloody car, and that is a nightmate.

Cheers

Pete

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey mate i posted in my thread i made to your offer, just saw the car looks great on the outside and has plenty of potential and definately is a good platform to rebuild the engine on for a decent price, but looking at the interior and its not as good as i hoped it to be. (im guessing the camera may play a part in that and it looks better in person?)

Looking for something a bit cleaner like the 34 i currently have (interior wise).

Price is quite reasonable, i hope you find someone that will buy it, sounds like it drives well. Either way i dont have anything more than 26K. :)

Ps. Ever thought of selling your dog and kids to keep the car? :devil: lol

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Price Dump. Need it gone.

$24,000 FIRM.

You wont find a better car for this money.

New rego, will be detailed prior to new owner picking up.

  • 1 month later...

farking hell dude ... I'm tempted to burn my car, scam the insurance (to pay off loan) just to get yours!! Just joking but yeah ...farrrkk, wish this car was for sale when I was looking to buy my R34 :)

Cmon people ..best GTT you'll ever find for this sort of money and nothing more to spend!!

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

SOLD pending final payment.

BLKR34..... that's a lot of time with a Rotex and lots of polishe to make her look like that.,..... Also fresh paint helps!

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...