Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just get it rego'd in tassie as SI on a rally log book and you don't have to worry about complied.

I don't know that its a huge job to convert a non-abs to abs since the ACD uses the abs sensors for wheels speed, so they already have that part covered.

Yeh I was pretty certain the cutoff year was and would be for the forseable future 2002, not sure where the idea that it increases every year came from.

That said VII it is?

Probably not ideal for tarmac but this is pretty damn cool, might see it at the Burger ring in June yet!

Lexus-IS-F-CCS-R-on-2011-Tokyo-Auto-Salon-front-side-view.jpg

WTF is that Timmay? A Subaru or something? It's icky :P

Yeah a 7 is the cutoff I believe..... not sure where the rolling year idea came from, maybe from Gus who was planning on running his Spec C in EM once it was elligible?

worse than a subie, it's a expensive toyota.

You can chuck the good ol commodore abs unit resnobly easy if you get a non abs model.

You would pick up an emo abs unit that would just fit too, plenty around.

Retro fitting the ABS can be a right pain in the arse. The hubs on the RS dont have the hole in them to fit the speed sensor so you need for hubs. The driveshafts dont have the ABS gear on them so you need to replace them. Then you need the AYC ECU and the yaw sensors and then figure out how to wire it up. :)

Preference would definately be to have one already equipped.

Glad to hear the date isnt shifting. After looking into classics Stu advised that the date after being shifted to 1985, is likely to stay that way for some time to avoid the goalposts consistently shifting as to what is the best car to be in. Would have hoped they were doing a similar thing for EM. I guess a revision about once every 10 years would make sense. Apparently it was about 15 years before classic got revised from 1980 to 85.

So a VII would be the pick out of the EMO range. Or really, get an 8MR RS and despec it to be a VII. The precedent has been set. :)

The RS has proper mechanical diff in the rear, the actual change is quite a lot from a GSR, you have to change basically the majority of the rear subframe, diff housing, axles, tailshaft and centre diff.

As this is what we did to Millars old IX.

True, precedent set ;)

What is the advantage besides an alloy roof?

To be honest Woo I am not quite sure on all of it. It was mainly the ali roof, slightly updated ACD software (they are reflashing the factory ACD ECU's now so no biggie) the VIII MR had slightly more aggressive cams, (different cam timing stock, same lift and duration) and a different huffer and thats about all I got off the top of my head.

You do pay a bit of a premium for the MR so maybe not worth it for largely a few kgs off the roof.

There were some MR RS's but they were rare as the proverbial. As Tim suggested, doing a GSR to RS conversion can be done but it is a little bit of work. With my TME it was just a RS diff centre, driveshafts and "moustache" (diff support) bar and subframe to do the swap. Tailshaft was sweet. Centre diff was sweet as well.

From my experience, you are best off trying to get as close a spec as you can out of the box rather than arsing around trying to turn something into something its not. A VII RS with ABS would be sweet if they exist, or possibly an 8MR RS if you can find one. Or an VIII RS I guess. Then its just a front bar, bonnet and rear wing essentially and you have a VII.

You would just go a motec diff controller anyway, or a ralliart controller (which I happen to know where there is one sitting :D)

Just not convinced you could take an VIII and run it as a VII just by changing bumpers

So how loose are the rules for Classics up to '85. I had plenty of time whilst waiting by the side of the road and thought of a pretty cheap and fun Classic MS car. Looking at some of the Torana's/ Mustangs I think I could put something through a sausage machine that would be fun and and pretty cheap, that once in a while could be pretty quick :)

And all this talk of Evos must make your vaginas sore? If you need 2L AWD then go R32 GTS-4 baby but seriously...Cossie Escort all the way!!!!! Every 2-3 months I look at all the cool Grp N ones you can buy out of Europe for almost a song. Most LHD but some RHD. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...