Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Our R33 N1 still has the AC control unit, just no AC pump. And as Beer Baron said, you can option stuff back on, our N1 had the radio optioned back on for some reason.

Edited by sav man
  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok guys i just asked the guy for the VIN....and im not sure if this is a common thing with Dealers but this is the response i got:

"Just wondering why, thats all, no one has asked us before in 10 years of doing this.

Have no dramas in you checking it if you are keen to come and have a look at the car and go further, but for a number of reasons, as I am sure you can appreciate, we keep all information pertaining to the cars in confidence until we are further down the track with a sale. I can assure you that the car is genuine in terms of being a Nismo, as we invite any independent mechanical inspection on the car in our premises.

There is no other "history" that you could research anyway in regards to the car apart from that anyway.

Re title etc,as a dealer we guarantee clear title, so that isnt an issue.

Not being difficult but i am sure that you understand.

Let me know if you have any further questions and perhaps we can arrange a time to inspect the vehicle."

Should i just make the effort and go get it? I mean i understand privacy laws etc in regards to vehicle details. So i don't know wether that has something to do with it.

:-)

I've contacted a dealer in QLD re a 94 V-spec II with a whole list of questions and pretty much got the same.

Problem though is that the fact that they're not willing to answer certain questions, immediately rings alarm bells for me.

Basically i got no response to questions such as, is there any rust on the car, and are there any marks on the interior!

:D Privacy laws.

He is a car salesman & is doing his job by getting you to come to the yard & talk to him about buying the car. If you want to buy it you have to do so anyway. So just go & see & write the number down.

Thats what i thought. I mite have to go down and have a look

Don't get confused with Nismo and N1 Editions.

NISMO,

The Skyline GT-R 'Nismo', introduced in February 22, 1990, has a total production of 560 units as required for the "Evolution" models regulation (over 500). Its purpose is to homologate a number of aerodynamic changes used in Group A racing.

Changes include additional ducts in the front bumper to improve airflow to the intercooler, a bonnet lip spoiler to direct more air into the engine bay, and an additional boot lip spoiler to provide more downforce. The 'Nismo' GT-R was only available in Gunmetal Grey.

N1,

The Skyline GT-R 'N1' model, introduced on July 19, 1991, was designed for home-market N1 racing with a total of 228 units produced.

The most notable change was in the engine, which was upgraded to the R32-N1 specification.

The car was also lightened by the removal of the ABS, air conditioning, sound system, rear wiper, trunk carpet, and the use of light-weight headlights.

No color options were available and all 'N1' cars were delivered with a thin layer of Crystal White paint.

I read a bit on - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyline_gtr

If it is a Nismo Edition, the main difference is that it has the Nismo Body kit, side skirts with the rear Spat as what sav man is trying to say. Engine, drivetrain etc its pretty much the same as a normal R32 GTR.

Do what djr81 said by getting the Build / Vin numbers when you go down and have a look at the car.

BTW the pictures you took of the car,

1. Its white (N1, maybe)

2. There is no spats on the side skirts but its got the intercooler ducts, bonnet lip spoiler and boot lip spoiler. (Nismo but not complete)

3. Its got a CD Player and Aircond (So just a normal R32 GTR)

4. No rear wiper + no rear wiper contol switch (Signs point to N1)

All speculations but it does not really all add up to make it either a NISMO or N1.

Again get the Build / Vin Numbers to be sure. Cool!

Well i fasted the vin no. and this is what i got:

6U9000BNR32220816 Vin no.

KBNR32RXFSZN Model

Augest 1992 Made

326 Paint Code (Crystal White)

Seems like a regular R32 GTR hope this helps

The KBNR sequence identifies it as an N1 version.

So it is NOT a common or garden variety R32 GT-R.

The KBNR sequence identifies it as an N1 version.

So it is NOT a common or garden variety R32 GT-R.

Well i fasted the vin no. and this is what i got:

6U9000BNR32220816 Vin no.

KBNR32RXFSZN Model

Augest 1992 Made

326 Paint Code (Crystal White)

Seems like a regular R32 GTR hope this helps

I think your right, if its got ZN then its indicated as a N1.

Damn!

Black Widow might be getting a really good deal.

if thats the chassis number with a ZN definately is an N1.

If you are looking to buy a clean R32 GTR you should check this out in person, if the car itself is in good condition it would be worth buying over a normal R32GTR as it will hold value much better.

awesome find.

:P

Michael

Guys,

Does anyone know if this statement is true?

"The N1 engine is identified by its 24U number stamped on the block, as opposed to the 05U stamp on standard RB26DETT engines".

If so, where is this number found?

Cheers

Guys,

Does anyone know if this statement is true?

"The N1 engine is identified by its 24U number stamped on the block, as opposed to the 05U stamp on standard RB26DETT engines".

If so, where is this number found?

Cheers

Is that a Wikipedia sorce, LOL!

I read the same thing so could right.

I would not base all the facts from that website as solid evidance.

I guess it gives an idea and ppl talk about it and could be true but be open for other opinions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...