Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Regarding the following mods to my R34 GTT, is my power figure in the ball park?

PFC

GCG standard turbo highflowed

Turbo back exhaust

Ebay front mount(!!!)

Splitifires

Greedy boost controller

Inclosed pod filter with cold air pipe

480cc Nismo injectors

Sard reg

Walbro pump

Tuned at 16psi, bleeding down to 14-15psi at 7000rpm

230kw at the wheels

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231028-decent-power-figure-for-gtt/
Share on other sites

have u checked the boost the turbo is generating; rather than the pressure at the manifold/boost guage?

Just curious to see what the compartive figures would be with the ebay intercooler. Dont want to go cooking the hiflowed stocka!

...but yes results show nothing odd!

Thanks guys, I appreciate it.

I might look into the pressure drop over the Ebay special cooler. I have had lots of people comment on how good the core looks, but they are just that - comments.

Might be worth checking the temperature drop too??? Especially at Supersprints.....

Yeah its ok .. can pull more out no worries.. I run 260 easily can take it to 280 if need be. Highflow too .. but use cams.

In all honestly I was running that power with a SAFC, Stock turbo, Stock fuel pump (was fine not leaning), Stock injectors, Stock ECU, CAI and thats about it..215 minimum

So honestly 15more rwkw with a highflow and etc you should have more .. Get a new Actuator and hole to gate closed for quicker boost build and holding boost.. GCG sell them HKS do so also (one on ebay now)

Edited by DECIM8

Are you for real? A auto pulls 200rwkw Easily on the stock turbo.. I just watched a auto pull 201.5rwkw

Its an R34 GTT remember not a GTST.

I have been at the strip and easily beat my friend in a GTST with 221rwkw so you take what you will but you must be dreaming if you think that 220 is not achivable in a manual R34 with flow mods..

At the same time I did run a R34 with similar mods, Intake (cheapo like yours) and exhaust (cat back) with stock ECU and it was very held back.. I beat it by about 1.5 cars

Forgot to mention full exhaust.

Edited by DECIM8

Yes i am for real. 215rwkw, i bet you wouldn't even come close to running 111mph @ the strip, because with 215rwkw, thats right where you would be but id expect more around the 105mph just like everyone else.

You beat a car with more power by 1.5 cars? Doesnt that ring a bell right away to you?

Because it sounds like someone doesn't know how to drive if the cars had the same power, so again, it has nothing to do with power at all that example

next?

Look put it this way .. That car was also running a stock turbo with injectors and putting out 215rwkw with PFC, Injectors, PUMP, fuel reg etc

A GTST.. R33 .. On a dyno day at UAS I think (the last NSW dyno day?)

My car is faster than that.. or im a better driver .. either one your choice..

Point is 215rwkw out of a stock turbo on a gtst is that easy why cant I do it on my R34.. I think you need to see it real life.. If only I had a print out..

Surely someone has something to post up for him..

R34 GT-T

Stock turbo

Full exhaust 3"

Pod Filter

FMIC

SAFC

EBC

BOV

205.7 KW @ 12psi

Is the best ive found in the search in dyno results thread.

I must add I was running a Blitz SBC which gives better boost/power through the entire rev range supposedly.. May be this.

Oh even better

1234dynosn4.jpg

Edited by DECIM8

I agree with Ash, the most I could get out of my NEO is just under 200rwkw.. and that is with all the supporting mods required.

The stock turbos just dont have enough flow and 218rwkw at 12psi is a fair way out in my opinion. Even with HKS GTRS and 15psi I was only getting 236rwkw.. So are you telling me that a bigger turbo with more boost is only going to give me less than a 20rwkw gain?

Any Drag MPH's to back that power figure up?

Mine:

R34 GTT

3" exhaust

pod

splitfires

manual boost controller (turbotech)

pfc

hybrid fmic

202.9kw @ 9psi (peaks at 12psi), just under 7000 rpm

I also have fueling issues and can say from my exp that stock injectors wont run far over 200kw.. generally 100% duty cycle at 7000rpm

tuned at RE

Mine:

R34 GTT

3" exhaust

pod

splitfires

manual boost controller (turbotech)

pfc

hybrid fmic

202.9kw @ 9psi (peaks at 12psi), just under 7000 rpm

I also have fueling issues and can say from my exp that stock injectors wont run far over 200kw.. generally 100% duty cycle at 7000rpm

tuned at RE

Exactly.. mine at a little less power and running healthy AFR was nearly maxing out the injectors as well. I dont believe the stock NEO injectors will provide much over 200rwkw.

Here is my graph to back up what i said above..

n564810885_579655_7099.jpg

Although, to add to the current discussion a bit more... i would hope once i have injectors, fuel pump and highflow/brand name turbo that i would be around 250rwkw at maybe ~16-18psi

Edited by nitestalkr
well I run 260rwkw with more to pull on a Rb25 neo engine why cant you guys do it? This was with highflow

I dont even have a FPR..

This is quite interesting now.

What other mods do you have?

I also have quite easily pulled out 265rwkw with the GTRS on a neo

dyno figures are meaningless unless you back them up with real world figures (like trap speed).

If you want to delude yourself into thinking you have 215rwkw on a basically stock motor with an exhaust and some boost, then go ahead. The 2 dyno graphs pasted so far both have been @ RE.. so im suspecting a happy dyno like ash said.

run a high 12 @ 112mph and we'll believe you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...