Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by 2fardown

Just because you get beaten by stock standard auto magnas. :shake:

hey no fair!

you guys all drive heavily modded skylines and forget what a standard skyline is like.

if this thread refers to standard cars i rekon the soarer...

Waz.

These are some factory figures from a reliable internet site- if there is such a thing:

Skyline R33 GTS25T:

187kw @ 6400rpm

295nm @ 4800rpm

7000rpm redline

1390 kg

6.18 seconds 0-100

14.39 seconds 400m

2.5 GT-Turbo:

208kW @ 6200rpm

362Nm @ 4800rpm

7250rpm redline

1600 kg

7.00 seconds 0-100km/h

15.06 seconds 400m

You fellas can extrapolate what you want from those figures. Just putting everyone on the same page.

There seems to be a lot of people who judge 'near-equal' performace cars be their kerb weight. So just out of curiousity i took some figures from the Holden website about various VY Commodores, as these seem to be the baseline car when people talk about weight; they always get mentioned somewhere along the line. Anyway, here you go.

SV8 Manual: 1638 kg

SV8 Auto: 1645 kg

SS Manual: 1658 kg

SS Auto: 1664 kg

SS UTE Manual: 1618 kg

SS UTE Auto: 1624 kg

245kW @ 5200 rpm

470Nm @ 4400 rpm

Looking at the torque figure, I wouldn't be surprised if a TT soarer can beat a GTS-t. That's an extra of almost almost 70Nm!

Driving it, the extra torque will also make the seat in the pants feels it's faster!!!

1jz's are factory under-rated, like 2jz's, rb26's and vg30dett's all are under the whole japanese 206kw bs. why do u think both the 1jz and 2jz are rated at like 206kw?? tell me that the 2jz aint got more power. anyways

my mate has an auto TT soarer, completly stock apart from a hks panel filter, the soarer normally wins against stockish 33's by 1-2 car length by about ~180 (so pretty close), the i found the laggy in comparison to a 33 (ive driven both, thou the 33 was pretty modded), it's lag lag lag then suddenly boost (and sideways lol)

and redline2003, trust me, they r quicker than flat 15's stock lol

with up'd boost, exhaust, intake u should beat one no prob thou, stock, ud want to get a good launch, and hope his car was running shitty lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...