Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey i just want some info on this conversion as ive heard mixed arguments.

I have been told you can fit a Z32 AFM to a gtst to eliminate its boost cut. now i have been told this can also be done without tuning the ecu. just a matter of wiring it in.

the directions for wiring it in are this:

• wiring for Z32 Maf into GTS-T

Z32 terminals are lettered A Thru to F, total of six terminals of which 5 are used on the Z32 and 4 on the GTS-t.

Working from A upwards as follows:

A: do not use

B: connect to Black wire on GTS-T MAF loom

C: connect to black/silver

D: connect to white

E: connect to black with white tracer

F: do not use.

Enjoy............

Can this be done with standard computer without tuning ecu?

Has anyone tried it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23170-z32-afm-into-gts-t/
Share on other sites

Hmm, well when I put on my Z32 I tried to run it without changing the setting in my ecu - idled like shit. Probably becuase the afm delivers different voltage for the same airflow.

As the voltage is different, say at 3000rpm and 50% load, the ecu is only recieving a signal that used to be associated 2500rpm @ 30% load, there fore your car will run very lean.

As far as I know, boost cut works on boost pressure, not air flow?

well the really wierd thing is that with std turbo i was running 1.1bar. with the 2530 it cuts out at 1bar. either its just creeping over 1.1bar and thats cut out or its just sending alot more air. i dunno.

I just wanna run more booooost!!!!!

I was going to get a fuel cut defender today but after reading the latest zoom article i think i want to steer away from the SAFCII and fuel cut defender. there is a great article on "sensor benders" the main problem is that by lowering afm signals the ecu will automatically advance ignition timing - and running high boost with highly advanced timing is looking for detonation.

so with a tuned ecu i can get bothe a/f ratios and ignition maps tuned correctly.

i figure as im aiming for 300rwhp its probably a safer move....

Cheapest thing to do is if your ECU is running the engine ok (std ECU right) with the exception of the boost cut, then plug my old ECU in and see.

If we swap std computer then im happy, i just want something that will run my car if i ever return it to stock, dont car if all the factory cuts are on it.

And i dont think the boost cut is related to the AFM being maxed out. There is a preset signal that when reached, will trigger the boost cut, but may be well before the AFM maxes out, i dont know... go to work with a willing passenger and a multi-meter.

  • 3 months later...
I was going to get a fuel cut defender today but after reading the latest zoom article i think i want to steer away from the SAFCII and fuel cut defender. there is a great article on "sensor benders" the main problem is that by lowering afm signals the ecu will automatically advance ignition timing - and running high boost with highly advanced timing is looking for detonation.

so with a tuned ecu i can get bothe a/f ratios and ignition maps tuned correctly.

i figure as im aiming for 300rwhp its probably a safer move....

I haven't read that article but it sounds like a crock. The S-AFC will see a lower air flow and send less fuel through. How does it know to advance the timing? It thinks the car has less air going into it, and that's all. On my PowerFC, the ignition advances as revs (and therefore airflow) increase. If anything I would say it's not advancing the ignition enough!

Whatever the case, the tuner should be able to tune the S-AFC without any detonation. I haven't heard of a single person that had detonation issues after getting their S-AFC properly tuned. I think the guy that wrote the Zoom article doesn't know what he's on about. Did he mention any alternatives maybe? Like some Aussie built ECU replacements? Sponsorship potentially at work here.

You have an R32, forget the S-AFC anyway and just get your ECU remapped. Should cost around $600 or less.

If you have an R32, just get it remapped - cheaper than an SAFC.

I know a guy who ran a fuel cut defender on an RB20 cefiro, ran 1.3bar, and in that trim it was driven hard for 2 years without a problem, so I have trouble believing what is being said about fuel cut defenders.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...