Jump to content
SAU Community

CRD Dyno day - DATE CHANGED - Now Oct 12th 2003


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

People - We have a BBQ available to us for tommorrows Dyno Day so please bring all nessesary food and drink. This strictly BYO, no food/condiments etc will be provided

See all of you in the morning

Nick

Another things guys I have spoken to ASM (Auto Salon Magazine) who are interested in doing a story on the Dyno Day.

They are unable to attend unfortuantely but have asked that we get some nice hi res photos of the event.

We are therefore looking for volunteers who can take photos and email them through to me for submission to ASM.

If anyone out there can assist please let me know tommorrow

Cheers

Nick

A good morning, sorry i had to head off so early.

thought i would have made a bit more power than i did :(

good to meet some of the boys and i'll meet the rest of you next time, might possibly be coming to the big cruise next fridy.

big thanks to nick for organising.

:)

B-Man, unsure *shrugs*

I had a Bosch 040 fitted about a month ago and the car is deffinetly quicker than it was when i did the 203 at Unigroup. I don't believe that CRD ran in Shootout mode (doesn't say on bottom of the printout) so add around 8-10% to adjust for that.

Still happy though coz im only using the standard ECU and no other management :(




  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...