Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not recommending this, but just showing it for interests sake:

http://www.draganddrift.co.uk/photos/rick_...ug16_051745.jpg

Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

Yeah mentioned them earlier in the thread when "GT45xx" based turbos came up.. they are pretty new and will probably be a pretty limited run. There is a drag GTR in the UK which is having one installed and should be doing some runs with it in the near future, same car did an 8.2 with a T51R Kai so should be very interesting to see what it does with something this substantial.

The real different is that HKS T51R KAi and SPL turbos use Garretts old T51 series Turbine in 76 trim , the Garrett marketed GT4294R and GT4202R use Garretts GT42 UHP turbine in 84 trim which is a more modern design .

Don't forget that most of the HKS spec Garrett turbo line has been around for a while now and sometimes use older T series compressors and turbines . Aside from T51's you have T04Z's with T series compressor and turbine so they aren't always cutting edge technology by todays standards . This doesn't means they're old dungers because often their custom housings make the best use of older tech wheels .

As was mentioned one of the GT42R's is going to be cheaper and at least stay with a variation of the T4/T45 footprint , the point is if you trash it and need to replace it the zeros will be less and the parts easier to get .

IMO you're looking at big turbos for an RB2530 so I hope you have deep pockets for the engine driveline etc .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

I don't think you will find the T62R BB as they still haven't been released yet. We have one on order for a customer in Aust. and should have here shortly for him. They are made in limited number and are pre order only (if anyone else wants one better PM me fast).

The Garrett equivalent weighs 10kg more than the T51 on our scales so that makes a big difference for starters. Attached is a pic of the exhaust housing available in 1.00 or 1.20 A/R which is a lot different to the Garrett.

Cheers

Marty

post-45152-1219619906_thumb.jpg

Edited by Martin HKS
Hey guys, your right i couldnt find any videos on youtube with cars running this new turbo but that didnt stop me from typing in 't51r' and watching some amazing supras, gtrs and even silvias running it. The sound is unmistakable.

You'll find if you search for GT42R/GT42RS/GT4202R cars will sound suspiciously similar :rofl:

The real different is that HKS T51R KAi and SPL turbos use Garretts old T51 series Turbine in 76 trim , the Garrett marketed GT4294R and GT4202R use Garretts GT42 UHP turbine in 84 trim which is a more modern design .

Don't forget that most of the HKS spec Garrett turbo line has been around for a while now and sometimes use older T series compressors and turbines . Aside from T51's you have T04Z's with T series compressor and turbine so they aren't always cutting edge technology by todays standards . This doesn't means they're old dungers because often their custom housings make the best use of older tech wheels .

As was mentioned one of the GT42R's is going to be cheaper and at least stay with a variation of the T4/T45 footprint , the point is if you trash it and need to replace it the zeros will be less and the parts easier to get .

IMO you're looking at big turbos for an RB2530 so I hope you have deep pockets for the engine driveline etc .

Cheers A .

I think the driveline should hold up ok. Ive got a C4 built byProtrans, 2 way diff and GTR drive shafts.

Yupe , as someone already mentioned it before

HKS T51R KAI = Garrett GT4294R

HKS T51R SPL = Garrett GT4202R

HKS T04Z = Garrett T67

of course Garrett units arent as bling as the HKS units :rofl:

As stated above, the SPL is actually a GT4502 not a GT4202.

And HKS T04Z = Garrett T04Z

Nope , T51R's use a T51 turbine which is why for some reason they're called "T51R" .

GT42's (4294 and 4202) use GT42 turbines .

There is also a GT4094R which not surprisingly uses a GT40 turbine .

A .

Sorry, I must have missed the point to your comment. Are you referring to what I said or what someone else has said?

No one above , Garrett virtually always call their turbos by the units turbine series number ie GT30 GT35 GT40 GT42 T4 etc etc .

The thing you will notice with large frame Garrett ball bearing "T" series turbos ie T04Z and T51R is the method of fixing the turbine housing to the side of the bearing housing (center section) . T series turbos use clamp plates and bolts where Garretts large frame bush or ball bearing GT series units have four "ears" on the back of the center section through which bolts screw into a series of threaded holes in the side of the turbine housing .

Its just a way of making a more modern cartridge fit the old T series turbine housings which make a matching set with the old T series turbines ie T04 P trim and T51 turbines .

Pay no attention to the American term "T67" compressor wheel , it's a flawed method of attempting to identify a compressor wheel by it's inducer diameter which in the case of the T04R compressor (used in T04Z turbo) is ~ 66.7mm . Precision over there sometimes calls their version of the T04Z PT67 meaning T04 P trim turbine + "T67" compressor .

I've no doubt HKSs housings are lighter and more compact than Garretts , the volute and nozzle sections of their housings are very different and more like the TiAL stainless steel ones .

A HKS spec T51R is not exactly a compact turbocharger , I suggest people search around for pics of GTRs with them fitted .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Turbonetics GTK Series (650, 800, 1000)

SEMA product of the year, less than half the price, can't go wrong.

And in case you're wondering what GTK stands for; according to them it's "Garrett Turbo Killer" :rofl:

And in case you're wondering what GTK stands for; according to them it's "Garrett Turbo Killer" :action-smiley-069:

Shame they are way more laggy and expensive than the Garrett GT series, at least they are pretty and strong :blink:

Shame they are way more laggy and expensive than the Garrett GT series, at least they are pretty and strong :action-smiley-069:

I think lag is comparable to the Garrett series (don't have actual proof so won't make any claims), but expensive? A GTK 650 turbo will cost you AUD $1800.00 delivered if you go through the right avenues.

And yes I concur they are pretty (not sure about the strong bit, no proof either)

Ive only heard bad reports about turbonetics turbos, can any confirm on reliability if any one in aus is using them?

I am in NZ, a mate of mine was running a Turbonetics T66 on his GTS4 for quite some time and it did hold on fine until he blew his motor and the oil got contaminated and stuffed the turbo. It was quite impressively laggy given it was on a 3litre, though granted it was a plain bearing/non GTK version. I'm surprised to hear they are potentially competitively price in Oz as here they are really expensive, probably part of the reason they are never used.

Its interesting that in their country of origin hardly anyone seems to use them either if you look through specs of all their time attack and top drag cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...