Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone know the maths to calculate?

I took my 4dr r33 to the drags for the 1st time and these where the results. I am interested what they equate to in rwkws as I have not had the car dynoed recently

13.331 @ 114.74

13.073 @ 114.13

13.065 @ 107.32

Any help appreciated

ive had cars run 11.70 with 285rwk. i doubt 30kw=1.3sec. the mph shows about 220kw at the wheels. your mph is showing about 220ish also

i ran 13.0 @ 113mph and at the time my car had 251.7rwkw

13.331 @ 114.74

13.073 @ 114.13

13.065 @ 107.32

The power estimates mate on here have me confounded - ~220rwkw seems to be the accepted approximate power for an R33 running 114-115mph?

What is done to your car? On our dynos (well most dynos around the world) 220rwkw is achieveable at a stretch on a stock turbo but trap speeds >114mph are very much not achieveable with the stock turbo on an R33. To be running those kinds of times/speeds I'd be hoping to see you are running around 1bar of boost, maybe a fraction more otherwise I am about to get very depressed.

I ran 111mph with no more than 200kW.

I wasn't talking about the dyno power, I am thinking of almost completely disregarding Oz dyno results - they mess with my head. Now I am just talking about outright modifications, trap speed sounds like it'd be a better measure of what the engine and car is doing that trying to work out what on earth the different between your dynos and everyone elses is, I just want to know if his car is doing substantially more than what 220rwkw means to me if that makes sense?

My car has run in the same kind of territory trap speed wise, running ~14psi through a GT30R on a completely stock RB25DET on a fairly slippery strip (actually an airfield...) but makes much more than 220rwkw on the dyno I run my car on, well actually ALL of the ones I have run it on which includes a rolling road dyno it made 260rwkw on. What I am hoping to hear is that my car for the mods it has that the times/trap speeds in the conditions aren't TOO bad.

Forget dynos then. The calculations I have used above take trap speed and weight and convert it to engine horsepower. I then converted that to rwkw. It could well be the case that this car makes 240-250kW at the back wheels but for this to be the case, it would relate to one or more of the following:

a/ weigh more than the 3350lbs I've allowed for

b/ have had a non representative run on the track

c/ been racing on a ridiculously bad track

d/ have had a schmuck behind the wheel

Don't get your knickers in a knot over chassis dyno figures. The big, black dyno never lies.

One of the reason I asked in my mate just got his GTR dynoed and was 490hp at one workshop and 404hp at a different workshop which makes me wonder how accurate these figures are.

I only had my car dynoed once at the last Nissan track day at QR Raceway and it was 192kw at the rear wheels but that was with stuffed coils breaking down at higher revs, and running .09 bar. Now has Splitfires and running 1.1 bar otherwise same spec. Car is in full street trim but has some mods HKS2535, Power Fc, 550cc Inj, Z32 AFM etc.

I will put it on the dyno next week and see what the result is, but I thought trap time might give a more accurate figure

I only had my car dynoed once at the last Nissan track day at QR Raceway and it was 192kw at the rear wheels but that was with stuffed coils breaking down at higher revs, and running .09 bar. Now has Splitfires and running 1.1 bar otherwise same spec. Car is in full street trim but has some mods HKS2535, Power Fc, 550cc Inj, Z32 AFM etc.

I will put it on the dyno next week and see what the result is, but I thought trap time might give a more accurate figure

Yeah this is the short of it, dynos are all over the place in readings - in Australia they seem to be all up the crapper as once I think I am starting to work it out a new strange result comes up. Dynapack, Dynojet etc used around the rest of the world have a bit of variance but they are all close enough to each other to get a rough idea.

I am glad to hear you are running ~1.1bar, its about what I expected for the trap speeds you were running (as said in an earlier post) - so long as its on a turbo which can more or less support it thats what it should trap. On the dynos I run on for what its worth, I'd expect it to be making in the territory of 250rwkw with a crap load of torque.

Yeah this is the short of it, dynos are all over the place in readings - in Australia they seem to be all up the crapper as once I think I am starting to work it out a new strange result comes up. Dynapack, Dynojet etc used around the rest of the world have a bit of variance but they are all close enough to each other to get a rough idea.

I am glad to hear you are running ~1.1bar, its about what I expected for the trap speeds you were running (as said in an earlier post) - so long as its on a turbo which can more or less support it thats what it should trap. On the dynos I run on for what its worth, I'd expect it to be making in the territory of 250rwkw with a crap load of torque.

A correctly operated Dyno Dynamics chassis dyno in the appropriate shootout mode will register pretty well spot on regardless of weather conditions etc. Making sure it's operated correctly is another thing all together.

A correctly operated Dyno Dynamics chassis dyno in the appropriate shootout mode will register pretty well spot on regardless of weather conditions etc. Making sure it's operated correctly is another thing all together.

By spot on do you mean more or less consistant with the other dyno types, or just consistant with other Dyno Dynamics set up for shootout mode? I have noticed that there seem to be occasional readings from DD dynos which seem similar to what I'd expect from a Dynapack.

By spot on do you mean more or less consistant with the other dyno types, or just consistant with other Dyno Dynamics set up for shootout mode? I have noticed that there seem to be occasional readings from DD dynos which seem similar to what I'd expect from a Dynapack.

Spot on with other Dyno Dynamics chassis dynos run in the same fashion.

  • 1 month later...

MPH verses weight is the easiest and best way to get a pretty acurate guage the vehicles WHP.

If you can run X amount of MPH and your car weighs X amount, you must have at least a certain amount of whp to do it.

When we ran 162mph on street tyres in street trim, the power required to do so matched our dyno numbers within a few whp but in general I don't take much notice of dyno numbers as MPH doesn't lie.

Rob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pressure when IDLING, is meant to be 51PSi... So that amperage value needs to go up a fair chunk... I'd personally be factoring for more like 12amp at least on those runs, and at that point you need to hope the already there wiring doesn't drop you a volt or two, as that's a lot of fuel pressure flow drop off from 13.5 to 12V! Taking idle pressure of 51psi, means the pump will be drawing a MINIMUM of 9amps all the time based on your reading of the graph (3bar base, then allowing an extra 0.5bar for boost = roughly 51psi)
    • Hi all,  I am in the market for an R200 longnose diff out of a Z31 300ZX, or S12 RSX, DR30 skyline, or similar, in a 3.9 ratio.  Preferably a late model one with the M12 crownwheel bolts.  The only easy to find advert for one of these was my ad back in 2007 when I sold it on this forum.  I sold the diff as I had sold the car it goes to, but as it turns out, after 18 years I got the car back late last year, so now I'm looking for the diff !  If anyone knows where to find a longnose R200 LSD with the M12 crownwheel bolts, drop me a line at [email protected] - Bonus paid if soomeone comes up with the original diff (stranger things have happened !).  Cheers   Ben D    
    • Hi everyone, I used to post here a bit from 2004-2013, when I owned various Nissans, in particular my S12 RSX gazelle, which was sold in 2007.  As luck would have it, after an 18 year hiatus, the car found its way back to me last year, and over the past 11 months I have had the pleasure of restoring it with my kids.  One thing that I am after in particular is a 3.9 ratio R200 LSD for it.  I actually sold the one out of the car here back in 2007 , and it would be incredible if I could track down who I sold it to, so I can see how they have progressed over the years (and to be honest, to see whether I can get the diff back !).  Anyways, hi all and let me know "where are the R200 Longnose diffs all at these days ?  Cheers Ben D  
    • Arms will be the same as the G35 or 350Z, but as above, there was a change in the lower control arm where it connects to the ball joint.  That said, you can remove the ball joint cone from your old ball joints and fit them to the new ball joints.  To be honest, I didn't think the ball joints themselves were different. The main ball joint is a bit awkward to replace, you really need to remove the steering knuckle to press out the old one.  Some people have used tools to remove it in place, but it just seemed too hard to get to. If you are going to press out/in that ball joint, then you may as well just replace the bushings in the LCA and the compression rod.  You can buy the compression rod bushing from Nissan, but the LCA bushes, you will need to go aftermarket. Much cheaper than buying the whole arm.
    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
×
×
  • Create New...