Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone know the maths to calculate?

I took my 4dr r33 to the drags for the 1st time and these where the results. I am interested what they equate to in rwkws as I have not had the car dynoed recently

13.331 @ 114.74

13.073 @ 114.13

13.065 @ 107.32

Any help appreciated

ive had cars run 11.70 with 285rwk. i doubt 30kw=1.3sec. the mph shows about 220kw at the wheels. your mph is showing about 220ish also

i ran 13.0 @ 113mph and at the time my car had 251.7rwkw

13.331 @ 114.74

13.073 @ 114.13

13.065 @ 107.32

The power estimates mate on here have me confounded - ~220rwkw seems to be the accepted approximate power for an R33 running 114-115mph?

What is done to your car? On our dynos (well most dynos around the world) 220rwkw is achieveable at a stretch on a stock turbo but trap speeds >114mph are very much not achieveable with the stock turbo on an R33. To be running those kinds of times/speeds I'd be hoping to see you are running around 1bar of boost, maybe a fraction more otherwise I am about to get very depressed.

I ran 111mph with no more than 200kW.

I wasn't talking about the dyno power, I am thinking of almost completely disregarding Oz dyno results - they mess with my head. Now I am just talking about outright modifications, trap speed sounds like it'd be a better measure of what the engine and car is doing that trying to work out what on earth the different between your dynos and everyone elses is, I just want to know if his car is doing substantially more than what 220rwkw means to me if that makes sense?

My car has run in the same kind of territory trap speed wise, running ~14psi through a GT30R on a completely stock RB25DET on a fairly slippery strip (actually an airfield...) but makes much more than 220rwkw on the dyno I run my car on, well actually ALL of the ones I have run it on which includes a rolling road dyno it made 260rwkw on. What I am hoping to hear is that my car for the mods it has that the times/trap speeds in the conditions aren't TOO bad.

Forget dynos then. The calculations I have used above take trap speed and weight and convert it to engine horsepower. I then converted that to rwkw. It could well be the case that this car makes 240-250kW at the back wheels but for this to be the case, it would relate to one or more of the following:

a/ weigh more than the 3350lbs I've allowed for

b/ have had a non representative run on the track

c/ been racing on a ridiculously bad track

d/ have had a schmuck behind the wheel

Don't get your knickers in a knot over chassis dyno figures. The big, black dyno never lies.

One of the reason I asked in my mate just got his GTR dynoed and was 490hp at one workshop and 404hp at a different workshop which makes me wonder how accurate these figures are.

I only had my car dynoed once at the last Nissan track day at QR Raceway and it was 192kw at the rear wheels but that was with stuffed coils breaking down at higher revs, and running .09 bar. Now has Splitfires and running 1.1 bar otherwise same spec. Car is in full street trim but has some mods HKS2535, Power Fc, 550cc Inj, Z32 AFM etc.

I will put it on the dyno next week and see what the result is, but I thought trap time might give a more accurate figure

I only had my car dynoed once at the last Nissan track day at QR Raceway and it was 192kw at the rear wheels but that was with stuffed coils breaking down at higher revs, and running .09 bar. Now has Splitfires and running 1.1 bar otherwise same spec. Car is in full street trim but has some mods HKS2535, Power Fc, 550cc Inj, Z32 AFM etc.

I will put it on the dyno next week and see what the result is, but I thought trap time might give a more accurate figure

Yeah this is the short of it, dynos are all over the place in readings - in Australia they seem to be all up the crapper as once I think I am starting to work it out a new strange result comes up. Dynapack, Dynojet etc used around the rest of the world have a bit of variance but they are all close enough to each other to get a rough idea.

I am glad to hear you are running ~1.1bar, its about what I expected for the trap speeds you were running (as said in an earlier post) - so long as its on a turbo which can more or less support it thats what it should trap. On the dynos I run on for what its worth, I'd expect it to be making in the territory of 250rwkw with a crap load of torque.

Yeah this is the short of it, dynos are all over the place in readings - in Australia they seem to be all up the crapper as once I think I am starting to work it out a new strange result comes up. Dynapack, Dynojet etc used around the rest of the world have a bit of variance but they are all close enough to each other to get a rough idea.

I am glad to hear you are running ~1.1bar, its about what I expected for the trap speeds you were running (as said in an earlier post) - so long as its on a turbo which can more or less support it thats what it should trap. On the dynos I run on for what its worth, I'd expect it to be making in the territory of 250rwkw with a crap load of torque.

A correctly operated Dyno Dynamics chassis dyno in the appropriate shootout mode will register pretty well spot on regardless of weather conditions etc. Making sure it's operated correctly is another thing all together.

A correctly operated Dyno Dynamics chassis dyno in the appropriate shootout mode will register pretty well spot on regardless of weather conditions etc. Making sure it's operated correctly is another thing all together.

By spot on do you mean more or less consistant with the other dyno types, or just consistant with other Dyno Dynamics set up for shootout mode? I have noticed that there seem to be occasional readings from DD dynos which seem similar to what I'd expect from a Dynapack.

By spot on do you mean more or less consistant with the other dyno types, or just consistant with other Dyno Dynamics set up for shootout mode? I have noticed that there seem to be occasional readings from DD dynos which seem similar to what I'd expect from a Dynapack.

Spot on with other Dyno Dynamics chassis dynos run in the same fashion.

  • 1 month later...

MPH verses weight is the easiest and best way to get a pretty acurate guage the vehicles WHP.

If you can run X amount of MPH and your car weighs X amount, you must have at least a certain amount of whp to do it.

When we ran 162mph on street tyres in street trim, the power required to do so matched our dyno numbers within a few whp but in general I don't take much notice of dyno numbers as MPH doesn't lie.

Rob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...