Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys FYI.

I recently had the Bilstein spring and shock kit fitted to my ARX.

The improvement in handling is everything I expected. It still has a 4WD feel, but is crisp and the floating feeling is gone.

On the negative side, the car is now too low for my taste, scraping on every speed bump in shopping centres.

To put this in perspective, it is worse than my 300ZXTT.

Ben from north shore prestige is looking at harder, original height, springs as an alternative to the Bilstein lowered springs.

Given the long wheelbase of these cars, I suggest you carefully consider your intended usage before lowering them.

I will keep you informed of our progress.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/234950-arx-suspension-experience/
Share on other sites

Guys FYI.

I recently had the Bilstein spring and shock kit fitted to my ARX.

The improvement in handling is everything I expected. It still has a 4WD feel, but is crisp and the floating feeling is gone.

On the negative side, the car is now too low for my taste, scraping on every speed bump in shopping centres.

To put this in perspective, it is worse than my 300ZXTT.

Ben from north shore prestige is looking at harder, original height, springs as an alternative to the Bilstein lowered springs.

Given the long wheelbase of these cars, I suggest you carefully consider your intended usage before lowering them.

I will keep you informed of our progress.

Have a read of the SK suspension thread. You should be able to adjust the ride height by moving the position of the circlip on the Bilsteins (that is the shocks) unless you have very much shorter springs (presumably not Bilsteins). I lowered my Series I Stagea by about 30mm so I have plenty of ground clearance except when angle parking on old fashoined high kerbs.

Guys FYI.

I recently had the Bilstein spring and shock kit fitted to my ARX.

The improvement in handling is everything I expected. It still has a 4WD feel, but is crisp and the floating feeling is gone.

On the negative side, the car is now too low for my taste, scraping on every speed bump in shopping centres.

To put this in perspective, it is worse than my 300ZXTT.

Ben from north shore prestige is looking at harder, original height, springs as an alternative to the Bilstein lowered springs.

Given the long wheelbase of these cars, I suggest you carefully consider your intended usage before lowering them.

I will keep you informed of our progress.

Mate I had the same problem. There is a cir-clip on the front shock.....the bottom setting is to low....I have set mine to the middle....the top setting is not to high either. Are your springs grey in color? If so there are eibach springs not the original Bilstein spring(PS Eibach are a better spring).....there is also an Eibach agent in Austalia and they can make your springs to any spec.

If you want the original ride height the cheapest way is to go back to the original springs or get them made.

Edited by Jetwreck

Just curious, anyone know what the standard M35 (non-arx) ground clearance is?

My previous stagea (s2) had 15cm clearance when stock...wondering if the M35 is different - meaning that yours may sit lower than a C34 with the same setup?

The standard suspension on an ARX makes it float like a boat. Way too soft.

The Bilstein suspension upgrade option includes lower springs and the car I test drove was fine on speed bumps around Chatswood. I thought that just upgrading the shocks would leave the car still handling poorly and that since the kit has been specially designed for ARXs, it would be fine.

I was partially right. - The package is great, the handling is much improved.

I did not try it on speed bumps in shopping centres. So now I need to get it a little higher. - The circlip machining idea sounds promising.

The purpose of the post is to warn others who may be thinking of taking the Bilstein option of what I see as a problem.

mm

I did not see your answer to the colour of your springs that came with your Bilstein Kit? I know Jetwreck got the grey springs with his kit and his car sits lower than mine. (tested on his driveway, his scapes, mine doesn't)

I got the blue springs with my kit in the Bilstein box that I believe are the original shock for this kit.

I agree the kit drops the the car about 40mm from standard ride height of 180mm to 140mm. I have not had any real problem with speed humps and scraping other than when I have had my car loaded with 5 fat arses and then it is an occasional scrape.

I also just loaded my car to the hilt and did a tour of Victoria including a trip to the top of Hotham and many country roads and had no issues with the ride height scraping.

If you are buying the suspension upgrade check what springs are being supplied. This seems to be the difference in the ride height.

Cheers

Andy

Edited by andy65b
This may be a silly question, but why would you buy a car that's built to be raised higher off the road than standard, then change the suspension so it's lower?

Why now just buy a different version that was made to ride lower to the ground?

Which is the other model that comes standard with a wider track, V-Hicas, Attessa and 18" rims? An is easy to find? On top of that all the luxury items? I know the AXIS does but it's $5,000 more expensive and still does not always get the Attessa or V-Hicas.

Also my shocks were gone when I got mine...have you seen the price of the standard Nissan shocks for the ARX?

The grey springs are Eibach not Bilstein.

Which is the other model that comes standard with a wider track, V-Hicas, Attessa and 18" rims? An is easy to find? On top of that all the luxury items? I know the AXIS does but it's $5,000 more expensive and still does not always get the Attessa or V-Hicas.

Also my shocks were gone when I got mine...have you seen the price of the standard Nissan shocks for the ARX?

The grey springs are Eibach not Bilstein.

That’s my dilemma, do I buy an AR-X and go to the hassle of lowering it, colour code the moldings and maybe upgrade the front to look like the AXIS. Or just be done with it and buy the AXIS?

Still haven’t decided…..

That’s my dilemma, do I buy an AR-X and go to the hassle of lowering it, colour code the moldings and maybe upgrade the front to look like the AXIS. Or just be done with it and buy the AXIS?

Still haven’t decided…..

So you want a car that looks like an Axis & handles like an Axis?

Why don't you just get an Axis then?

You can get all the luxury trimmings of an AR-X in an Axis.

Thanks for the answers to my earlier question & sorry if I'm hijacking this thread.

To those of you who have bought ARXs, can you tell me more about the suspension?

Is it a case of "this suspension isn't sporty enough for my liking", or is it more like "this suspension feels like it belongs on a crappy American family sedan"?

And also can you tell me if the car meets your expectations?

I've got my eye on one, but I'm facing the same dilemma - ARX or spend the extra on the (better looking, in my opinion) Axis?

Cheers - Sven

I went through the exact same thing.....AXIS....ARX....AXIS.....ARX.....I was bidding on both but what I got was a great deal so I ended up with the AR-X....and a lot of change in my pocket to get the car to how I wanted it.

In the answer to sporty or a bus on cross-pliers(american shitbox).....The AXIS is the more sportier model being 100kg's lighter and is already set up pretty good.....but that is nothing a good set of springs, shocks and swaybays cannot fix on the ARX. Remember at the end of the day this is a station wagon so if you think you are going to end up with some sort of R34 GTR you are mistaken.....in saying that I don't think you will ever see a Ford Territory, Falcon Station wagon or a Adventura/Commodore keeping up to one of these in the wet......and they will be battling in the dry as well.

In answer to the standard suspension on the AR-X....it's actually not to bad.....but you do feel the weight of the car......let's put it this way, it was better than the Turbo Territory and Holden Adventura I test drove when I started looking for a new car.

Edited by Jetwreck
  • 1 month later...
Thanks for the circlip suggestion - unfortunately, mine is already on the highest settings.

I will wait to see what Peddars want for their springs.

m

Got the new Peddars springs installed.

She doesn't scrape any more and retains the outstanding handling.

If anything, it has improved the turn in and the car has more tendency to over steer than the previous under steering.

Sway bars are next on the list.

Can anyone recommend someone to install them for me?

m

Got the new Peddars springs installed.

She doesn't scrape any more and retains the outstanding handling.

If anything, it has improved the turn in and the car has more tendency to over steer than the previous under steering.

Sway bars are next on the list.

Can anyone recommend someone to install them for me?

m

As long as you can get under the car it is easy. SK actually posted a thread on how to install them on the M35 (done on my car). It is literally an unbolt and bolt new ones back in place.

Which ones are you looking to buy. I fitted a solid 32mm front (same size as original but was hollow) and solid 24mm rear (original was 22mm hollow), it is also the adjustable one. I found that the rear needs to be on one setting harder than the front. I am thinking of backing off the front as it can still under steer on throttle at low speeds and the tuck in when you lift the throttle is a little slower than I would like.

Cheers

Andy

As long as you can get under the car it is easy. SK actually posted a thread on how to install them on the M35 (done on my car). It is literally an unbolt and bolt new ones back in place.

Which ones are you looking to buy. I fitted a solid 32mm front (same size as original but was hollow) and solid 24mm rear (original was 22mm hollow), it is also the adjustable one. I found that the rear needs to be on one setting harder than the front. I am thinking of backing off the front as it can still under steer on throttle at low speeds and the tuck in when you lift the throttle is a little slower than I would like.

Cheers

Andy

I don't have access to a lift.

I have read the threads on how to, but have heard that there are some mobile mechanics who can do the job for me.

m

I don't have access to a lift.

I have read the threads on how to, but have heard that there are some mobile mechanics who can do the job for me.

m

ramps would be enough, mind you I don't have those either. :LOL

may have to get some....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...