Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I'm new to this forum. I have just bought an R32 with an RB25DET NEO conversion. It's in a zillion pieces and I'm going to repaint it, engineer it and use it as a weekend warrior. I have a couple of questions though.

When the motor is running, oil pressure is very high. The motor has an RB25 oil pressure sensor but an R32 oil pressure gauge. Does the RB25 and the RB20 send the same voltage signal to the oil pressure gauge, or is the high oil pressure an indicator of a blocked oil return etc (I've only run the motor for about 10 minutes so far).

Secondly, do front mount intercoolers need to be engineered? If so I'll put it in before taking it to get engineered. If not, I'll do it after.

Thirdly, can anyone recommend a good engineer in the Adelaide Hills area?

Cheers!

Sparky

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235794-noob-car-plans-and-questions/
Share on other sites

I dont think you will have to get the engine engineered, just upgrade to 34 GT-T rotors and calipers and you should be fine with regency. FMIC's do not need to be engineered, however they will only be legal if there is no cutting/modification to the reo, no cutting/modification to the chassis and it is bolted on correctly so that it deosn't move around (including the piping). AFAIK anyway...

Definately a sweet little project you've got yourself, good luck!!

32 with rb25 neo! ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::P

nice car by the sounds mate! hope it gets out and works alright for ya! goodluck! try the recommended workshops thrread on sau, and nissansilvia.com for some ideas for engineers

if you can take the car for a quick drive and get the car at full temp see what happens to the temp. once my car is first started the oil pressure is abit high but drops after the car gets to full temp.

front mounts are not illegal if you havent cut through the chassis or damaged ther reo as damo_34 has said and mounted correctly.

apply at regency for an engine swap form thing and send it through to them and see what they say. if you have the correct rated breaks to the engine you could get away with it but if not youll need to get the car engineered. if they say this, ask them for which engineer to use, i know on their site somewhere they have a huge list of them to pick from

here you go mate, this could be usefull to you. scroll down to about the 6th page and work your way thorugh it :)

http://www.transport.sa.gov.au/pdfs/person..._bulletin_3.pdf

and heres that list of engineers that i was talking about. could be worth talking to them before regency i recomend Rory thompson!

http://www.transport.sa.gov.au/pdfs/person...d_engineers.pdf

happy reading :)

kye

Cheers for all the help peeps!

ovrtym33, I'll get in touch with you if Regency say 33 brakes are enough. Do you have the calipers too or just the rotors?

ImportS13, cheers for the links. I dropped into JAZMAC performance in Mt Barker the other day, he also recommended Rory.

All others, cheers for the positive comments. I'm looking forward to getting it on the road.

RE oil pressure, it sits on 8 when idling and climbs above the gauge when revved hard, which I think is way too high. What grade oil should be used in them? As it's possibly too viscous and not flowing well enough. I need to do a full fluid change.

RE oil pressure, it sits on 8 when idling and climbs above the gauge when revved hard, which I think is way too high. What grade oil should be used in them? As it's possibly too viscous and not flowing well enough. I need to do a full fluid change.

7.5w40 or 10w40 is what most people use. 80psi is normal on my aftermarket gauge for idle when the car has just been cranked. once the oil has warmed up it sits on 30 psi. If I drive the car after its just been started, pressure goes past 80, but never 100psi (which is the max of my gauge). Most times it sits on 40/50 psi while driving after engine is hot, with an idle of 25-30psi. If you get below 20psi, be concerned.

-D

Edited by Dohmar
  • 2 weeks later...

Well I did an oil/filter change using genuine Nissan parts and it still registered very high. So I bought an oil pressure tester and an engine manual. I connected it up to the block and warmed up the motor. The pressures just over what the book says it should be on, so I'm happy with that. The problem is with the oil pressure gauge. I could mount an aftermarket one but I'd like all factory guages to display the correct figure.

There's obviously a voltage difference between the RB20 and RB25 oil pressure sensors, however they're listed in the parts catalogue as using the same sensor!!?? Any thoughts? Can I get the stock 32 gauge recalibrated?

I know one member here had a HUGE issue with engineering her NEO engined R32 - particularly with the brakes.

Apparently the RTA were real idiots with regards to it requiring a particular rotor thickness, and thicker ones wouldn't pass!

It can and has been done however.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...