Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just thinking.

Wouldnt it be nice if we could drive faster on the roads. say 75 in a 60 zone legally.

1st of all. The car must be able to stop in the same space/distance that a standardized car *eg a holden omega*

2. Must be able to stop at that distance cold *ie 1st thing in the morning*

3. Must have random test to prove that it can still stop in that distance other wise the speed is reduced.

So bascially im saying.

Grab a holden omega commie get it to 60kph and brake as hard as you can. lets say it can stop in 40m *its just numbers*

Next grab your nicely done up car. eg bigger brakes, better tyres, decent suspension, get it up to a set speed. ie 60kph and brake as hard as you can. Lets say it stops in 25m

next test is to speed up the car, ie 70kph, do the same thing, ie get the car up to speed and brake. lets say it brakes in 33m

then increase the speed of the car until it can stop within the 40m in 3 quick sessions.

There is a neg to this tho. It would be lanes of traffic. maybe also change the road rules so that only certine cars can use the right hand lane after they have complete the test? and on single lane roads, they can only drive as quick as the slowest car

anyway i thought i would just put this up for discussion. so enjoy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237247-changing-in-rego/
Share on other sites

Just a few questions:

How would police know if an individual car was speeding? (easy to say any car traveling over 60km/hr is speeding, and it makes good revenue )

There is more to driving than stopping distances.

Are the roads up to an acceptable standard? Poor road surfaces have a huge impact regardless of the cars ability.

In the end it will never happen, its too hard, too easy to critisize and there isnt enough votes in it (lower the speed limit even further though and then you will win votes- unfortunatley)

There is more to driving than stopping distances.

True. But people like to twist an argument to benefit them, so this thread ain't dead yet :O

This is the most stupidest idea I've heard yet :D

I think speed limits should be abolished altogether outside of the City limits and more money spent towards driver training and awareness improvements. Speeding doesnt kill; inattentive driving does.

Speeding does kill ... its killed quite a few wallets lately.

one point of trouble for this is if the point of impact is within the first 30m.. your sports car is still travelling considerably faster than the commy. it's not always the distance to stop but the speed at point of impact which is before your stopping distance.

It should be a lot harder to get your license in the first place and more cash needs to be spent on driver training and education. rather than just the easy out of slowing down traffic, especially on open roads, say between Alice & Adelaide, 1500 k's is a long drive and at 100-130kph gets very tiring, but at 150-200kph you are more alert and travel time is greatly reduced, thus less chance of an accident.

You can't really have different rules for different cars, how is an observer meant to know if one skyline (or whatever) can stop in a certain distance and another can't?

Why did the NT remove that unlimited speed limit on their freeways and restrict it to some mild 130k/h? That would be cool if they removed the speed limits on our country freeways.

All you'd hit is a Water Buffalo.

I say, abolish Defects. Daniel for SA Premier. Straight pipes with no cats, screamers and cardboard bodykits should be legal! Woo!

Wait... am I talking shit again? Damn.

I was just thinking.

Wouldnt it be nice if we could drive faster on the roads. say 75 in a 60 zone legally.

1st of all. The car must be able to stop in the same space/distance that a standardized car *eg a holden omega*

2. Must be able to stop at that distance cold *ie 1st thing in the morning*

3. Must have random test to prove that it can still stop in that distance other wise the speed is reduced.

So bascially im saying.

Grab a holden omega commie get it to 60kph and brake as hard as you can. lets say it can stop in 40m *its just numbers*

Next grab your nicely done up car. eg bigger brakes, better tyres, decent suspension, get it up to a set speed. ie 60kph and brake as hard as you can. Lets say it stops in 25m

next test is to speed up the car, ie 70kph, do the same thing, ie get the car up to speed and brake. lets say it brakes in 33m

then increase the speed of the car until it can stop within the 40m in 3 quick sessions.

There is a neg to this tho. It would be lanes of traffic. maybe also change the road rules so that only certine cars can use the right hand lane after they have complete the test? and on single lane roads, they can only drive as quick as the slowest car

anyway i thought i would just put this up for discussion. so enjoy.

ummm....

Point of this thread?

I think we lost our "no limits" because poli's think we need to follow suit of the states.

Makes no sense to me, as roads in SA and Tas that I know of, are skinny rough and twisty and speed limit is up to 110k's yet on open, flat, wide, straight roads we can only do 130k's... it just doesn't make sense!

one point of trouble for this is if the point of impact is within the first 30m.. your sports car is still travelling considerably faster than the commy. it's not always the distance to stop but the speed at point of impact which is before your stopping distance.

It should be a lot harder to get your license in the first place and more cash needs to be spent on driver training and education. rather than just the easy out of slowing down traffic, especially on open roads, say between Alice & Adelaide, 1500 k's is a long drive and at 100-130kph gets very tiring, but at 150-200kph you are more alert and travel time is greatly reduced, thus less chance of an accident.

You can't really have different rules for different cars, how is an observer meant to know if one skyline (or whatever) can stop in a certain distance and another can't?

maybe i did not get my idea across.

also i did not take in account the speed of impact. but then again what is the average speed of impact?

as for the should be harder to get your licence. I disagree, getting your licence should be a peice of cake, BECAUSE you have had enough training and education.

Maybe would should also have the same type of training that germany does with its autobahn system, where you cannot drive on it till you have passed a autobahn 'test.

as for observer to know the difference, maybe have the numberplates a different colour?

at the end of the day it will NEVER happen,its already been said that it is just too hard for it to be enforced etc.i say spend the extra money on fixing up the dam roads. SA = worst roads i have ever seen.if i have to travel along south rd again and hit a freaking man hole cover that has sunk 4cm into the ground again im going to go hire my own dam bitumin machine and fix the dam things.

with how hard my car hits them i wouldnt be soprised if its doing damage because its sure as hell hurting me.

I think speed limits should be abolished altogether outside of the City limits and more money spent towards driver training and awareness improvements. Speeding doesnt kill; inattentive driving does.

right on the money

spend all the money in the world on changing speed signs, and you'll get marginal benefits on average

spend all the money in the world on more in depth training for drivers (scoring an 80% on your log book test you can do entirely at your leisure surely can't be all that satisfiying.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...