Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ill put 100 buckos on the table for all those nubs who are rubbishing Trent saying he fudged figures. To turn around tune a 1000hp RB and keep it alive for longer than 5mins
would you like my bank account details...?
Are you calling your self a nub?
hmmm.. the Dirtmans car makes close to 1000hp

I know he is not a nub and im not calling him one, now that all the quotes are in sequence you can see where my question came from.

Might be one of those odd quarter mile times if the engine blow was at 1/2 track. Perhaps a decent 60' but the rest gives no indication of performance.

Reminds me of a drag bike I saw do a 11 second pass at 88mph, only on the power to about 1/3 the track length. And a vw beetle that did a 13 second pass but completed the last 50 meters sliding on its side and roof...

come on. please give it a rest guys. who gives a shit. trent merely wanted to share the DYNO result of an awesome car he had the pleasure of tuning. I don't think he intended it to become a zub measuring contest. he just wanted to share his excitement and results. no where did he claim it was any better than anybody else, except that it would make more power than his own project car...

it's not up to him to prove anything. it's not even his car. ask the owner about it if you are genuinely interested. other than that I think it's time we all moved on. :(

PS: GTRNUR your GTR looks awesome and strangely familiar... :P

come on. please give it a rest guys. who gives a shit. trent merely wanted to share the DYNO result of an awesome car he had the pleasure of tuning. I don't think he intended it to become a zub measuring contest. he just wanted to share his excitement and results. no where did he claim it was any better than anybody else, except that it would make more power than his own project car...

it's not up to him to prove anything. it's not even his car. ask the owner about it if you are genuinely interested. other than that I think it's time we all moved on.

couldn't agree more!

PS: GTRNUR your GTR looks awesome and strangely familiar... :)

lol, i wonder why? :P

  • 2 months later...
After a sleepless night last night anticipating how to handle tuning possibly australia's tuffest R34 GTT (built by James @ OH Performance) things went remarkably smooth. With a smidge over 2bar we cracked 1002HP ATW (746.8rwKW) and 1046NM!!!! more than enough to kill any illusion that i would be able to keep top dog on my own dyno with my own unfinished project (twin T04Z turboed 427ci windsor 77' LTD)

Who said PFC's cant handle HP????

Good work buddy, looks and sounds like a weapon!

come on. please give it a rest guys. who gives a shit. trent merely wanted to share the DYNO result of an awesome car so he could premote his business. I don't think he intended it to become a zub measuring contest. he just wanted to share his excitement and results. no where did he claim it was any better than anybody else, except that it would make more power than his own project car...

it's not up to him to prove anything. it's not even his car. ask the owner about it if you are genuinely interested. other than that I think it's time we all moved on. :laugh:

PS: GTRNUR your GTR looks awesome and strangely familiar... :P

:bunny:

A nub i am.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...