Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

anyone no minimum and maximum requirements yet????
Min

CPU: AMD64 3200+/ Intel P4 3.00Ghz

Memory: 8GB free HD space, 512Mb (XP)/ 1Gb (Vista)

Graphics: 3.0 shader, 256Mb GeForce 6600GT/ ATI 1600XT or better

so it's slightly higher specs than COD4

Max :banana:

CPU: Intel QX9775 3.2Ghz

Memory: 4GB DDR3

Graphics: Nvidia GTX280 quad SLI/ ATI HD4870X2 in quad crossfire

:laugh:

  • 2 weeks later...

Treyarch made the horrible COD 3 for "last gen" consoles. Let's see if they learnt for the mistakes of the past. I guess using the COD 4 engine is a good start. 4 player co-op is a big advantage...but they need to sort out lag issues or have local servers setup...you know that the PC will but consoles is unknown

Treyarch made the horrible COD 3 for "last gen" consoles. Let's see if they learnt for the mistakes of the past. I guess using the COD 4 engine is a good start. 4 player co-op is a big advantage...but they need to sort out lag issues or have local servers setup...you know that the PC will but consoles is unknown

Yes they did! and remember it was on 360 and PS3 so this gen as well.

And it was truly a shitty shitty game, so I am a little worried about the quality of world at war, sure if it's the same as number 4 but WW2 thats good. But it would be nice to see them try some new ideas!

the prices of games these days re rediculous, its just a cd, anyways, i will be picking it up after work from jb, hopefuly they get it in today. i bought brothers in arms which was absolutely dog, so gonna switch it!

i liked brothers in arms hells highway, i just bet the game the other day. the controls were easy to use to move your men and the slow mo headshots and explosions were awsome i love gore and violence lol. just got world at war and done a few missions its good so far, makes it easier cause everything moves and plays like cod4 so you dont have to get used to different buttons.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...