Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Got my PowerFc installed and tuned about 3 weeks ago, and am very happy with it! makes my r33 fun again! haha

ALTHOUGH ive noticed over the last week or so, my car has started to knock to pretty high levels on occasion. So since i will have to drive back to get my car re tuned, or at least have a closer look at the ignition maps (3 hour drive to melbourne) i figured i will replace my cat converter. My car has a turbo back JJR exhaust, and yes my exhaust has an infamous x force hi flow cat. i figured i may as well anyway, will most likely gain kws and car maybe run a little better. i think anyway? haha

Are the x force cats really that bad??? could it even be one of the factors to why my car may be knocking sometimes??? (car has the following mods - turbo back exhaust, FMIC, Fuel pump, Power FC, makes 200 rwkws) or just the tune?

Which brings me onto my main question, where can i find supply of "metalcat" cat converters?? ive tried psi products twice, and also emailed them and received no word back, the only other supplier i found was justsr.com, but the phone number on the site rang out. I want one in a hurry, as i will need it on my car by about next weekend

Question number 2 is, is there any other brands of cat that are of equal quality??? any experiences?

and question 3, it seems quite a few people on here have said that their metalcats are collapsing??? so should i maybe steer clear of them now???

i know there is a few threads on this, which i have read. but any more info would be very very much appreciated

Cheers

knocking will be more to do with the tune id imagine... cell or two needing adjustment

To test just drop the cat, replace with a pipe and go for a drive.

You'll soon see if you know how to get the knocking going under certain conditions

i don't know a lot about cats, but the $160 Xforce one i got from just jap isn't very good. It's causing an exhaust flow restriction at high rpm and i'm losinga decent chunk of power.

also looking for a better alternative myself. Don't really want to hollow out the Xforce, but it definately would make it high-flowing.

is the x force cat round or ovalish?

the stainless round ones are fine and are used on many many high horse power cars with no problems at all. the others are just a normal ceramic cat

you'll probably find that all of the metal cats use the same core.

Edited by Angus Smart

yeah your right r31nismoid, i figured that more or less it was the tune causing the problem, although im thinking that maybe the cat might have a little to do with it, but like you said, after some runs with the cat and without it, i will soon find out.

a few hours after i wrote this thread, i ended up getting a phone call back from psi, for a 3 inch metalcat it will cost me 280 including delivery from brisbane to albury via australia post, which was a lot cheaper than i thought they would be!

so sleepr85 you have a metalcat on your car, have you had any troubles with it???

No problem at all. From what i can tell its as free flowing as i've had. Not tried xforce but have only heard bad things about them on these forums which led me to buy the metalcat. Looks really well made as well so i didn't mind paying a bit extra for something that was gonna potentially improve response and performance.

Not tried xforce but have only heard bad things about them on these forums which led me to buy the metalcat.

the problem with xforce is, people think this is a high flow cat

xfhighflowcat.jpg

when realistically its just as cheap and ceramic as any other cat on the market.. around (160) and is perfect for emmisions etc.

i figure most people are using this type as it comes with xforce exhaust systems.

now for real high flowing cats with a metallic core.

xfmetalcat.jpg

this is an xforce item and these are very good! my friend installs them all the time, and never had any problems what so ever on alot of very high hp cars!

the problem with xforce is, people think this is a high flow cat

xfhighflowcat.jpg

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fo...gh-t161580.html

well with threads like the above on our own site, do you blame them? they are advertised as high-flow.... perhaps they shouldn't be? i've been looking at getting one of these, but judging by people's comments now im thinking twice about it.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fo...gh-t161580.html

well with threads like the above on our own site, do you blame them? they are advertised as high-flow.... perhaps they shouldn't be? i've been looking at getting one of these, but judging by people's comments now im thinking twice about it.

i'd say they will be alot more high flow than the standard 15 year old cat still on your import when it comes in :dry:

a problem with skylines and most imports, they run a bit rich on the standard computers and this will clog up a cat in no time!

your better off going with a cat around the $300 mark aka a cat with a metallic core.

Edited by Angus Smart

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...