Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Recently on a long track, the Apexi AVC-R (EBC) fitted in my R34 GTT, clocked 302km/h as the top speed during the length of the Journey, i have an after market Nismo Meter which shows speeds upto 300Km/h but unfortunately i was lookin on the track and not the speedometer. Although I do remember shifting to the fifth gear cause the revs were upto 6.7 on the 4th gear (never had to floor car above 4th gear) and after shifting into 5th i was still pushing on the pedal.

As for other mods, the car has a Front Mount Intercooler, the Apexi EBC as listed above, full 3.5inch cat back exhaust and was running it on 0.76 Kg/cm2 Boost.

Do you guys think the AVC-R has recorded some false value? or is 302km/h a comfortable speed for the RB25DETT engine? the car is 1998 so the engine is not brand new?

Any expert opinion or comments guys? im confused?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/240286-r34-gtt-top-speed/
Share on other sites

whats your diff ratio, and tire size? work out your theoretical geared top speed

then you will need to find out your drag coefficient which isnt usually very accessible data unless you either

1. have a wind tunnel

2. find your actual top speed and have accurate power figures as well

ps. 302kmh is approx 187mph thats pretty fast for a standard skyline

two main components for calculating theoretical top speed

rolling resistance

drag due to air resistance

rolling resistance is fairly linear so easy to calculate

drag due to air resistance has a cube relationship to speed.

so the increase of 250kmh to 300kmh is a factor of 1.2

the power increase you need is the cube of this factor (1.2) = 1.728

using very average numbers for coefficient of friction, average combustion efficiency and average drivetrain losses, you need 408hp (flywheel hp) to reach 187mph. very rough numbers though but just to give you the scale of things.

Edited by clip14

Hmm interesting thread... *subscribing*

I hit 265km/hr on a pretty worked RB25 before... that was the reading off my F-CON Navigator (I only have a 180km/hr dash), and am not sure if its entirely accurate.

...not with a 3.6 diff

BTW Thelma & Louise didn't even reach that speed in the last few seconds in the T-Bird!

In reply to the post above,

the T-Bird after leaving the cliff will accelerate to the point of terminal velocity where the wind resistance balances out the gravitational pull.

The T-Bird's terminal velocity would be a maximum of 60m/sec = 135mph = 216Km/Hr >_<

  • 6 months later...
speed limter? no mention of an aftermarket ecu?? and nothing about removing speed limiter.. so i assume max speed at 180... if not i don't think you'd get that speed on 0.76 Boost...

The speed limiter isn't in place and its an after market Nismo Speedometer so reads upto 320km/h and yes its calibrated!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...