Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for a while now iv read and been told that a 10/40 grade of oil was the right stuff to use so today i changed from castrol edge 10/60 to royal purple 10/40 and to my shock i was told that its to thin for a forged engine so i felt like a num nut (again)

so how true is this?

and why?

thanks....

Edited by WARLORD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/240497-what-oil-to-run-in-a-forged-engine/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Royal Purple is very good oil.. on par with the Motul. I run the RP10/40 in my forged engine no worries. As already said though, your engine builder should know what oil best suits your application.

Royal Purple is very good oil.. on par with the Motul. I run the RP10/40 in my forged engine no worries. As already said though, your engine builder should know what oil best suits your application.

yer but ...... !!!!!!!!! i think rp is much better than castrol and the only thing i got from him was watch the oil temp and it might burn oil ,that's it

Edited by WARLORD

i now run 25/60 penrite bearings are in alot better condition once stripped down rather than a thinner oil i was previously using

but this car doesnt see street duties id say 10-60 would be better for more start / stop driving

thats supposed to go in your gearbox. lol

all forged engines are different. it depends on your clearances. in the old days piston to bore clearance was 6thou. now a good quality forged piston like a CP for example can be clearanced as close as 2thou.

big end and main clearances are similar, some set them a little larger for high revving engines which is the reason a lot of skylines pick them up as they are to tight. the brand does not matter, as long as it is a quality oil. its the grade thats important. and the viscosity should be a 5w40, 10w40, 5w50, on a recently built engine. or similar. running an engine in is also important as some builders and camshaft manufacturers reccommend that it is done with a mineral oil only.

i run Repsol engine oils in all my engines, and plan on running 5w40 Comp in my Ls1 even though the piston to bore is a little excessive. if it uses oil it means its getting everywhere it is needed.

i now run 25/60 penrite bearings are in alot better condition once stripped down rather than a thinner oil i was previously using

but this car doesnt see street duties id say 10-60 would be better for more start / stop driving

i agree, if the builder has told you to run a 10w60, thats what you use.

Well thats what you put in there then. He built it, he knows tolerances etc, he dictates the rules.

Forum can offer little

/thread :(

15w50

This oil is awesome. I have never spun shit when using it.

You will pay for it though.. just a little small extra insurance policy IMHO.

DO NOT RUN IN YOUR ENGINE ON THIS OIL.

It wont run in :(

which is 10/40

right

MOTUL 300v chrono is the only oil you should be running.

agreed. I love it. true 100% synthetic ester. ie the real deal. I even run it in the lowly silvia. :(

edit: just one point 300V chrono is 10W40. the 15W50 you are talking about must be 300V 'competition' or someting. all the 300Vs are the same quality of oil, just different viscosity.

my engine has done 15k on 10/60 so ill give it a go the engine sounds quieter now with 10/40.. i change oil every 4k so ill see .

thanks for the input guys nice to see friendlier comments this time .

Well thats what you put in there then. He built it, he knows tolerances etc, he dictates the rules.

Forum can offer little

/thread :O

the forum has offed some good info,that' :( s what its all about right.

what he is saying that sometimes people give opinions on topics they have no idea about, and have no liabillity at the end of the day if they give you a bum steer.

the forum has offed some good info,that' :( s what its all about right.
what he is saying that sometimes people give opinions on topics they have no idea about, and have no liabillity at the end of the day if they give you a bum steer.

Croydon used to insist i run 20/60 Motul 300V Le Mans...probably cause they stocked it and it cost me $300 to do an oil change with it.

Croydon used to insist i run 20/60 Motul 300V Le Mans...probably cause they stocked it and it cost me $300 to do an oil change with it.

that's cheap............not

what do you use dirtgarage

o and by the way does anyone have a job these days so many people on this morning.

Edited by WARLORD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...