Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not being smart at all... just you were saying you want 400+hp and are thinking of a swap... i know i'd be looking at a 26 :P

i have personally made up my mind on what my motor is going to consist of and its going to be an abortion of RB and Brian crower stroker parts and a turbo the size of a garbage can so i can have about 1500rpms of usable power, however, within that 1500rpms my asshole will pucker every single time. retard style. mmmmmmmmmmBWA(oh shit!) pssht <shift>

i still love the idea of a 1J though, espcecially the single turbo vvti one. the technology is much newer than the RB, which, i love to death, however, it truly is a CA18 with a couple more cylinders.

if C&Y can do it for reasonable money and you want to be different then by all means do it. consider going for a 1.5JZ very popular with the drifters I've been out with around tokyo/chiba/further out. though they were mostly still at home in big toyota sedans and probably looking at 600ps for the meanest one. but they put them to good use on the mountain roads, industrial areas and circuits for drifting. :P and they sound awesome coming down the mountains, but not really any sweeter to my ear than a nicely done RB...

Younger brother runs the twin turbo version of the 1JZ in his 83 Celica Supra. Those turbo's may be tiny.....but lordy does is develop some useable torque - awesome street engine especially in a 1280kg car....and literally screams to the redline.

Only mod is running twin dump pipes of the turbo's and integrate them into the 3 inch exhaust under the car.

Edited by juggernaut1
with that being said, the "team toyo" drift car, not kawabatas, but kuroi's, is running a 1J that he pulled a RB25 out to put in.

anyone running one in an R chassis car?

Originally ran a Rb26 not a 25 and yes it was running a toyota jz... now back to rb26 apparentley.... i heard he did not like the resistance to want to rev.... said it felt truck ish.

Don't under rate the 1JZ or even the 2JZ they are very strong motors right from the factory.

They don't have problems with oil control or coil packs and take a huge amount of thrashing

In America they have had 2JZ run 9 sec quarter miles with stock internals and thats with

reliability.I have driven a std 1JZ supra and R33 and the toyota was a lot quicker they make

around 370Nm at about 3000rpm now thats not bad.I have also driven a 600hp GTR which

was awesome but it took an awefully large amount of money to do it reliable.

jz series are good but there not the motors people make out to be, Yes there strong but some people seem to obsess saying there is nothing wrong with them and never get probs - well yes they do get probs. There stronger than a RB25 and faster in stock form, but there not the godsend people make them out to be. There also very heavy, heaver than all the RB motors.

If you have a 25 dont bother but like you said if your motor does die a $800 buck one would be great especially if it has VVTI.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...