Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As the topic suggest, the latest Motor magazine has an article on the R32 GT-R..

"Few legends are as indisputable as Nissan's Giant-crushing R32 GT-R"...

It is sold in a bag together with some random issue of FHM. Thought some people on here might be interested!

Edited by r32line
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/240778-nissan-r32-gt-r-write-up/
Share on other sites

Got the mag at Shell Servo after work today.

Main points are, how ppl had 2nd thoughts on how the car would perform but it was a killer of a car on street and track.

RB26DETT

HICAS

ATTESA ET-S

Saying how back in 90's it did 0-400 km/h in 4.8 secs, same as todays HSV W427. Hence Japan achived this performance 18 years ago.

History on Bathurst.

AUS delivered R32 GTR's and how they differed from JDM.

Price on a ADM vs JDM R32 GTR

Good and Bad points

Overall one of the best performance cars for the money you pay today.

Also came with a FHM mag with Lara Bingle on the front.

Lara Bingle :/ FTW

Got the mag at Shell Servo after work today.

Main points are, how ppl had 2nd thoughts on how the car would perform but it was a killer of a car on street and track.

RB26DETT

HICAS

ATTESA ET-S

Saying how back in 90's it did 0-100 km/h in 4.8 secs, same as todays HSV W427. Hence Japan achived this performance 18 years ago.

History on Bathurst.

AUS delivered R32 GTR's and how they differed from JDM.

Price on a ADM vs JDM R32 GTR

Good and Bad points

Overall one of the best performance cars for the money you pay today.

Also came with a FHM mag with Lara Bingle on the front.

Lara Bingle :blink: FTW

Damn! Ill have to get mine looked at cause it is certainly not capable of that! :)

LOL!

Ah Fek!!! My bad. Its 0-100km/h in 4.8 secs :sick:

Ok fixed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...